• Specific Year
    Any

SUPREME COURT ACT 1935 - SECT 25

SUPREME COURT ACT 1935 - SECT 25

25 .         Rules of law upon certain points

        (1)         The law to be administered as to the matters in this section mentioned shall, unless the contrary is expressly provided by some other enactment, be as set out in subsections (6) to (12).

        [(2)-(5)         repealed]

        (6)         No action shall be open to objection on the ground that a merely declaratory judgment is sought thereby, and it shall be lawful for the Court to make binding declarations of right without granting consequential relief.

        [(7), (8)         deleted]

        (9)         A mandamus or an injunction may be granted, or a receiver appointed, by an interlocutory order of the Court or a judge in all cases in which it shall appear to the Court or a judge to be just or convenient that such order should be made; and any such order may be made either unconditionally or upon such terms and conditions as the Court or judge shall think just; and if an injunction is asked, either before or at, or after the hearing of any cause or matter, to prevent any threatened or apprehended waste or trespass, such injunction may be granted, if the Court or a judge shall think fit, whether the person against whom such injunction is sought is, or is not, in possession under any claim of title or otherwise, or (if out of possession) does or does not claim a right to do the act sought to be restrained under any colour of title; and whether the estates claimed by both or by either of the parties are legal or equitable.

        (10)         In all cases in which the Court entertains an application for an injunction against a breach of any covenant contract or agreement, or against the commission or continuance of any wrongful act, or for the specific performance of any covenant contract or agreement, the Court may, if it thinks fit, award damages to the party injured, either in addition to or in substitution for such injunction or specific performance, and such damages may be assessed in such manner as the Court directs.

        (10A)         Nothing in subsection (10) shall limit or affect the jurisdiction or powers which the Court has apart from that subsection.

        (11)         Subject to the express provisions of any other Act, in questions relating to the custody and education of infants, the rules of equity shall prevail.

        (12)         Generally (subject to the express provision of any other Act), in all matters not hereinbefore particularly mentioned, in which there was, before the passing of the Supreme Court Act 1880 6 , any conflict or variance between the rules of equity and the rules of the common law with reference to the same matter, the rules of equity shall prevail.

        [Section 25 amended: No. 32 of 1969 s. 4; No. 10 of 1982 s. 28; No. 72 of 1984 s. 10 7 ; No. 20 of 2005 s. 17; No. 19 of 2010 s. 51.]