[Home] [Databases] [Search] [Feedback] [Help]
	Melbourne University Law Review

2009

Volume 33

Issue [ 1 ]

Volume 33 No. 1

Articles

• Still Paying The Price For Benign Intentions? Contextualising Contemporary Interventions In The Lives Of Aboriginal Peoples - [2009] MULR 1; (2009) 33(1) Melbourne University Law Review
  Billings, Peter
• Credit Rating Agencies:A Regulatory Challenge for Australia - [2009] MULR 2; (2009) 33(1) Melbourne University Law Review
  Bunjevac, Tin A
• Cross Examination in Child Sexual Assault Trials: Evidentiary Safeguard or an Opportunity to Confuse? - [2009] MULR 3; (2009) 33(1) Melbourne University Law Review
  Cossins, Annie
• The Charter’s Irremediable Remedies Provision - [2009] MULR 4; (2009) 33(1) Melbourne University Law Review
  Gans, Jeremy
• The Professional ‘Tug Of War’: The Regulation Of Foreign Lawyers In China, Business Scope Issues And Some Suggestions For Reform - [2009] MULR 5; (2009) 33(1) Melbourne University Law Review
  Godwin, Andrew
• National Litigation and International Law: Repurcussions for Australia's Protection of Marine Resources - [2009] MULR 6; (2009) 33(1) Melbourne University Law Review
  Klein, Natalie; Hughes, Nikolas
• The Nature Of Torrens Indefeasibility: Understanding The Limits Of Personal Equities - [2009] MULR 7; (2009) 33(1) Melbourne University Law Review
  Low, Kelvin F K
• Change of Position and Restitution for Wrongs: 'Ne'er the Twain Should Meet?' - [2009] MULR 8; (2009) 33(1) Melbourne University Law Review
  Walker, Paul A

Critique and Comment

• The False Analogy between Vilification and Sedition - [2009] MULR 9; (2009) 33(1) Melbourne University Law Review
  Gelber, Katharine
• ‘Storyline Patents’: Are Plots Patentable? - [2009] MULR 10; (2009) 33(1) Melbourne University Law Review
  McEniery, Ben

Case Note

• Lumbers v W Cook Builders Pty Ltd (In Liquidation): Restitution For Services And The Allocation Of Contractual Risk - [2009] MULR 11; (2009) 33(1) Melbourne University
  Bryan, Michael

Books Received

• Books Received - [2009] MULR 12; (2009) Melbourne University Law Review
  Melbourne University Law Review