|
![[WorldLII]](/images/logos/WorldLII_small.gif)
Contributors:

|
|
[Databases] [Recent Additions]
[Translate]
[Add a Link]
[Disclaimer]
- DPA Law [Search
] Provides comprehensive information on data protection in the United Kingdom and Europe. Includes links to Data Protection Act 1988 and other related legal materials. Maintained by Stewart Room
- Patrick Gunning "Casenote - Spring v Guardian Assurance PLC" [1994] PLPR 113
An insurance company gave another insurance Company a bad references about Spring, a former employee. There was no malice, so a defamation action was defeated by the defence of qualified privilege, but the reference was given negiligently. The House of Lords, by majority, held that the employer owed a duty of care to the subject of a reference (as opposed to the recipient), and that principles of negligence and defamation were different. The House of Lords decisions was in contrast with a number of New Zealand cases. Lord Keith, dissenting, thought the policy underlying qualified privilege was the same in relation to both negligence and defamation.
- UK - Data Protection Act 1998 [Search
]
- United Kingdom - Office of the Information Commissioner [Search
] Site of the former Office of the Data Protection Commissioner
|