|
National Strategy to Address Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Disadvantage This strategy aims for a society where Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples enjoy comparable standards of social and economic well-being to those of the wider community, especially in the areas of education, health, employment, housing, and law and justice, while maintaining their unique cultural identities. This is a near final draft of what the final national strategy might look like. It draws on the feedback the Council received to its draft Document for Reconciliation and the draft framework for this national strategy, which was circulated for comment on 1 December 1999. The strategy is attached for your information. The Council is currently looking to finalise this Strategy at its 10-12 March 2000 meeting and then provide it to governments prior to Corroboree 2000 to enable them to consider it and announce their commitments to implementation. For
more information please telephone: Or
write to: Or
e-mail: Or
visit our web site: Prepared
by the Partnerships in
National Strategy to Address Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Disadvantage Setting the Scene In a just society, it is unacceptable if one part of the society continues to experience significant disadvantage. Yet, in Australia, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as a whole fall far behind the level of well-being enjoyed by the wider community. They do not experience the same levels of health, education, employment and economic independence as those enjoyed by most Australians. For reconciliation to grow in the life of the nation, this difference in experience must be addressed. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples have the right to share in Australia’s land, wealth and resources and to contribute equitably to the nation’s economic, social and cultural life. This is why the Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation now asks individuals and organisations across the nation to commit to implement this national strategy. If we all work together - individuals, families, local communities, businesses, faith communities, Indigenous organisations, voluntary and philanthropic organisations and governments - we can address the levels of disadvantage experienced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Communities, businesses, organisations and governments can give effect to this strategy through their regular corporate and business planning processes. They can develop their own plans and identify activities for implementing the recommended actions in this strategy. When developing their plans and activities, they should consider the range of example actions listed in Appendix 1. All should also take both immediate and ongoing actions that contribute towards addressing the causes and consequences of disadvantage. Understanding disadvantage The history of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander disadvantage began with the dispossession of land and the displacement of people. Discrimination, the intergenerational effects of poverty and the loss of autonomy have fuelled it. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples often face prejudice when trying to rent a home, finding employment, getting service in shops and banks, and doing the simple everyday things that most Australians take for granted. Disadvantage in one area increases the likelihood of disadvantage in other areas. For example, without study facilities at home, even with parental encouragement, learning for many will be hard. Similarly, children with hearing loss from middle ear troubles or undernourished children will find education difficult. Poor sanitation affects health, as does poor or inappropriate housing. Career progression to middle and senior levels often requires tertiary education. Being poor and unemployed statistically lowers self-esteem and increases illness, death and the likelihood of arrest and imprisonment, just as poor health and limited educational achievement affects employability. Ultimately, all Australians benefit from a united effort to address Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander disadvantage. As Indigenous disadvantage is overcome, the economy grows and the need for government expenditure is decreased. At the same time, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples will be better placed to fulfil their cultural, social and economic aspirations. Working together and shared responsibilities There are no simple "quick fix" solutions to turning around the levels of disadvantage that have been many generations in the making. To go forward we must learn from the past and build on good practice, recognising that there are successful public, private and community sector programs and initiatives that have made substantial inroads. Key elements of these successful initiatives are leadership and benchmarking. While it has not performed as well as expected, we should build on the promise of the Council of Australian Governments’ 1992 National Commitment to Improved Outcomes in the Delivery of Programs and Services for Aboriginal Peoples and Torres Strait Islanders. This strategy builds on the national benchmarking and accountability work that has commenced in some sectors (for example, in the health sector, there are agreed national indicators and targets). The strategy seeks to extend such benchmarking and accountability frameworks to all sectors. Addressing disadvantage places responsibilities on those providing support and assistance and on those receiving it. For those who provide support there is a duty to those being assisted. For example, it means that service providers should: work in partnership with local Indigenous people and communities; recognise the cultures and histories of Australia’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and the consequences of past policies and practices; and build the capacity of local Indigenous communities to help themselves. For those being assisted, there is the responsibility to help themselves as best as they can. This may involve seeking out information about available services, helping service providers to improve delivery outcomes, and recognising and tackling personal barriers to improvement. Some Indigenous communities have identified that taking responsibility in education and employment is an essential part of the way forward. Local, Territory, State and Federal governments and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (ATSIC) have collective social responsibilities to their constituents. Governments are responsible for ensuring that citizens have access to the resources and the opportunities needed to take their place in society, through (for example) health and education services. Governments have the responsibility to ensure that their programs and services do not produce welfare dependency or other unintended consequences. They are responsible to their taxpayers for delivering services that provide value for money. Finally, Australian governments have responsibilities under the international treaties that Australia has entered into. What we can achieve This strategy aims for a society where Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples enjoy comparable standards of social and economic well-being to those of the wider community, especially in the areas of education, health, employment, housing, and law and justice, while maintaining their unique cultural identities. The following objectives build on this aim. The objectives provide a guide for people and organisations as they put this strategy into practice. They provide specific issues for consideration when Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples establish agreed benchmarks with governments and service providers. They also serve as national performance indicators. Ultimately, the effectiveness of this strategy should be evaluated against the scale of improvements and reductions achieved. Education
Health and well-being Employment Housing Law and justice Communities Some have argued that several of the above desired outcomes are based on Western assumptions about disadvantage and that they may have limited cultural relevance to Indigenous peoples. Where this is the case, it may be unrealistic to expect full statistical equality to be achieved with the wider community, even in the long term. However, it would be wrong to describe as disadvantage those specific statistical differences that arise directly from cultural obligations and self-determination. To deal with the potential for cultural bias in the setting of benchmarks and to provide regional flexibility, the Council is looking to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples to agree national, regional and local benchmarks with governments and service providers. Regional and local benchmarks are more responsive to the cultural choices and local circumstances, while at the same time creating a positive climate for continual improvement. This strategy will be successful only if the agreed outcome targets are achieved. Where the performance has been less than desired, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, service providers and governments should sit down together, review what they have done and ask why they have not achieved the desired result. These discussions should lead to an agreement on new or improved actions to address disadvantage. The actions we can take The Council has identified five critical areas where actions are necessary to address Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander disadvantage:
1. Leadership at all levels Leadership at all levels is necessary to address disadvantage. Indigenous people are one source of leadership. The Council of Australian Governments is another. The members of the Council of Australian Governments are the Prime Minister, State Premiers, Territory Chief Ministers and the President of the Australian Local Government Association. Peak organisations in the corporate and community sectors also have a leadership role. These bodies include the Business Council of Australia, the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, the Australian Council of Social Service, the Real Estate Institute of Australia, and faith groups, to name a few. Ongoing leadership and commitments are particularly required in respect of deaths in custody, the forced removal of children from their families, and observance of Australia’s international treaty obligations. Actions – what needs to be done and who will do it
2. Building stronger communities and equal partnerships While national leadership is important, disadvantage must be addressed through regional and local actions. It will involve the business sector and local service providers working with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as equal partners. Actions to address disadvantage build upon and reinforce the network of relationships and the resources of the local community. They are selected to respond to the unique opportunities and threats in each community, recognising that what works in one place may not work in another. Actions – what needs to be done and who will do it
3. Better service delivery Governments have a central position in service delivery. However, they are not the only providers of services. This strategy uses the term "service providers" to include the traditional government and community service providers such as hospitals, meals on wheels and schools, and Indigenous organisations, whether they are provided directly by governments or they are contracted out. It also refers to private sector service providers in the education, health, employment, housing, and law and justice sectors, such as real estate agents and chemists. Public, private and community sector service providers should re-examine their services and approaches to ensure that they are culturally appropriate and do not, even unintentionally, discourage Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander clients. In looking to address disadvantage, services should be innovative, adopt best practice models, coordinated at the delivery level and, where necessary, agree to approaches that are otherwise outside the usual style of service delivery in the wider community. Actions – what needs to be done and who will do it
4. Accountability and benchmarking Governments at all levels have a responsibility to ensure that their citizens have the opportunities they need to achieve their potential. Without reliable information about the level of need, the money spent and the services delivered, citizens cannot hold their governments accountable for this responsibility. Benchmarking systems are one way to achieve this. These systems require governments to say upfront and publicly what they plan to achieve, and later to report openly on their actual performance against the original plans. By benchmarking their results, government organisations are able to identify those areas where greater effort is required. Public reporting allows Australian citizens to apply appropriate political pressure where performance is lacking. All accountability and benchmarking systems require accurate data and a measure of independence and honesty in data collection and analysis. Actions – what needs to be done and who will do it
5. Appropriate funding arrangements Having the right "rules" to govern the funding of services and programs to address disadvantage is a critical factor for success. Insufficient, inflexible and poorly applied funding are all contributory factors to past program failures. The strategy recommends that governments adopt more effective, whole-of-government approaches to funding. The funding for education, health, employment, housing, and law and justice programs should focus on people and places rather than government programs. It must be transparent, consciously coordinated and integrated within governments, between governments and at the service delivery level. The role and responsibility of governments at all levels and ATSIC needs to be agreed. Actions developed under this area must also be linked to the accountability and benchmarking measures. No person should be disadvantaged by the inability of governments and service providers to communicate and cooperate in the delivery of services. It is no longer acceptable for an education department, a health department, an employment department, a housing department, a community services department, a police department, a justice department or a corrections department to say something is not their responsibility, if the matter affects the achievement of the desired outcomes for that agency. This means, for example, that education departments and schools must work with health and welfare departments, local service providers and local communities on the nutrition and hearing of students if this is affecting educational outcomes. Actions – what needs to be done and who will do it
Examples - what this strategy could mean in practice Example 1 – reducing crime by helping families Governments have traditionally responded to Indigenous youth crime by imposing punishment-based measures through the criminal justice system. In many ways, this approach has failed. It does little to reduce youth crime and it is expensive (up to $175 000 per year to keep a young person in detention, not to mention police, court and legal costs). Under this National Strategy, governments can choose to take a more effective approach to addressing the problem that is freed from the confines of narrow program thinking and funding restrictions. For example, in addition to traditional punishment approaches, governments could seek to help families whose children may be more likely to experience incarceration, especially "stolen generations" families. This might involve governments placing Indigenous social workers into troubled communities and among families at risk. Alternatively, it might involve the establishment of community support programs for new parents. In other countries, such parenting programs have been shown to significantly reduce juvenile incarceration rates years after the program has ceased. The benefits of such approaches are clear. For governments, the cost savings would be considerable. These programs only have to keep a small number out of prison to pay for themselves. For Indigenous communities, they reduce the rate of youth incarceration and encourage the development of stable families and stronger communities. Example 2 – addressing systemic discrimination A large Indigenous community lives in the region surrounding a small country town. The town has a community centre which provides a number of services and facilities to the community, including vocational courses, computer facilities and business support, meeting venue, and children’s activities (including child care). However, the local Indigenous community feels that their needs are not met by the community centre. Hence, they do not use the services provided by the centre. The first step in resolving this problem is undertaking an audit to identify what can be done to meet the needs of the local Indigenous community. This would involve the funding agencies and managers of the community centre coming together with the local Indigenous community and discussing the options and constraints, such as building a new centre for the Indigenous community, and making better use of the existing centre and the available resources. Better use of the existing centre could involve:
Appendix 1 Example actions to address disadvantage A number of important issues and ideas for action were raised during the Council’s consultation process on this National Strategy. Ideas for action have also been identified in a range of past reports and reviews. While some of these issues and ideas may have national application, the Council recognises that others only have State, Territory or local application. Therefore, rather than prescribing these actions for the nation, the Council asks that governments, service provider agencies and Indigenous organisations consider the applicability of the following as they develop their action plans to give effect to this National Strategy. Education Possible actions include:
Health Possible actions include:
Employment Possible actions include:
Housing Possible actions include:
Law and justice Possible actions include:
All sectors Possible actions include:
Appendix 2 Indicators
of social and economic well-being | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Indicator |
Comparison populations |
NSW |
Vic |
Qld |
SA |
WA |
Tas |
NT |
ACT |
Aust |
|
Life expectancy at birth (Males 1991-96) |
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander males (years) |
56.9 |
||||||||
|
All Australian males (years) |
75.2 |
|||||||||
|
Comparison ratio |
0.76 |
|||||||||
|
Life expectancy at birth (Females 1991-96) |
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander females (years) |
61.7 |
||||||||
|
All Australian females (years) |
81.1 |
|||||||||
|
Comparison ratio |
0.76 |
|||||||||
|
Hospital separations –age standardised rate per 1,000 (Males 1996-97) |
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people |
489.5 |
312.1 |
452.2 |
644.0 |
637.7 |
32.5 |
587.8 |
412.7 |
488.6 |
|
Other people |
260.1 |
269.3 |
279.0 |
281.1 |
246.9 |
262.7 |
195.2 |
194.9 |
266.0 |
|
|
Comparison ratio |
1.88 |
1.16 |
1.62 |
2.29 |
2.58 |
0.12 |
3.01 |
2.12 |
1.84 |
|
|
Hospital separations –age standardised rate per 1,000 (Females 1996-97) |
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people |
493.6 |
331.6 |
524.4 |
825.8 |
773.1 |
32.3 |
797.4 |
444.5 |
572.8 |
|
Other people |
290.7 |
303.1 |
305.8 |
314.2 |
275.9 |
300.6 |
228.7 |
220.6 |
296.5 |
|
|
Comparison ratio |
1.70 |
1.09 |
1.71 |
2.63 |
2.80 |
0.11 |
3.49 |
2.01 |
1.93 |
|
|
Perinatal mortality – rate per 1,000 births (1994-96) |
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander mortality |
16.3 |
16.8 |
24.3 |
25.6 |
20.1 |
|
27.0 |
|
21.7 |
|
Other mortality |
8.4 |
10.8 |
10.6 |
10.2 |
9.4 |
11.5 |
9.7 |
|||
|
Comparison ratio |
1.94 |
1.56 |
2.29 |
2.51 |
2.14 |
2.35 |
2.24 |
|||
|
Hospital separations –homicide/injury purposely inflicted – age standardised rate per 100,000 population (females 1997-98) |
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples |
198.23 |
1035.8 |
1972.9 |
3135.8 |
|
2138.1 |
677.1 |
||
|
Other Australians |
22.1 |
28.5 |
44.2 |
40.6 |
36.3 |
28.6 |
||||
|
Comparison ratio |
8.98 |
36.32 |
44.66 |
77.21 |
58.83 |
23.68 |
||||
|
Imprisonment rate per 100,000 adults (1998-99) |
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples |
1919.7 |
917.9 |
1785.7 |
2030.4 |
2856.7 |
379.6 |
1488.6 |
839.6 |
1827.2 |
|
Other Australians |
120.6 |
76.0 |
153.7 |
100.6 |
133.1 |
86.0 |
152.4 |
64.3 |
112.5 |
|
|
Comparison ratio |
15.92 |
12.08 |
11.62 |
20.18 |
21.46 |
4.41 |
9.77 |
13.06 |
16.24 |
|
|
Death rates per 100 prison years (1998-99) |
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples |
0.34 |
0.00 |
0.37 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.21 |
0.00 |
0.22 |
|
Other Australians |
0.38 |
0.33 |
0.38 |
0.18 |
0.34 |
0.34 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.35 |
|
|
Comparison ratio |
0.89 |
0.97 |
0.63 |
|||||||
|
Care and protection orders per 1,000 children aged 0-17 years (June 1999) |
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children |
22.3 |
28.5 |
16.5 |
15.3 |
8.1 |
4.6 |
3.1 |
31.2 |
14.6 |
|
Other children |
3.1 |
3.5 |
3.1 |
2.7 |
1.7 |
4.2 |
2.4 |
3.2 |
3.3 |
|
|
Comparison ratio |
7.19 |
8.14 |
5.32 |
5.67 |
4.76 |
1.10 |
1.29 |
9.75 |
4.42 |
|
|
Unemployment rate (1996 Census) |
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples (%) |
28.7 |
21.8 |
35.4 |
36.7 |
40.3 |
20.1 |
52.7 |
17.6 |
34.2 |
|
Other Australians |
8.6 |
9.4 |
9.4 |
10.2 |
7.9 |
10.8 |
5.8 |
7.2 |
9.0 |
|
|
Comparison ratio |
3.33 |
2.33 |
3.75 |
3.59 |
5.13 |
1.86 |
9.12 |
2.45 |
3.80 |
|
|
Clients of the Supported Accommodation and Assistance Program (SAAP 1998-99) |
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander clients as a proportion of all SAAP clients (%) |
13.2 |
4.5 |
13.8 |
13.1 |
28.6 |
8.8 |
42.9 |
8.0 |
12.7 |
|
Indigenous Adults as a proportion of total adult population (%) |
1.3 |
0.4 |
2.3 |
1.1 |
2.3 |
2.4 |
22.9 |
0.8 |
1.5 |
|
|
Comparison ratio |
10.15 |
11.25 |
6.00 |
11.90 |
12.43 |
3.67 |
1.87 |
10.00 |
8.47 |
|
|
People in dwellings with 10 or more people (1996 Census) |
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people (%) |
0.92 |
0.76 |
5.38 |
3.91 |
8.15 |
0.32 |
29.17 |
0.00 |
6.63 |
|
Other people (%) |
0.17 |
0.16 |
0.13 |
0.08 |
0.09 |
0.10 |
0.17 |
0.09 |
0.14 |
|
|
Comparison ratio |
5.41 |
4.75 |
41.38 |
48.88 |
90.56 |
3.20 |
171.59 |
47.36 |
||
|
Year 12 retention rate (1998) |
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students (%) |
31.4 |
42.2 |
50.3 |
18.4 |
19.8 |
35.6 |
11.4 |
100.0 |
32.1 |
|
Other students (%) |
67.9 |
76.1 |
78.4 |
67.7 |
73.5 |
63.2 |
60.2 |
90.9 |
72.7 |
|
|
Comparison ratio |
0.46 |
0.55 |
0.64 |
0.27 |
0.27 |
0.56 |
0.19 |
1.10 |
0.44 |
|
|
Has post secondary school qualification (1996 Census) |
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people (%) |
16.68 |
20.07 |
12.87 |
14.47 |
10.42 |
19.06 |
6.10 |
26.95 |
13.58 |
|
Other people (%) |
36.91 |
33.88 |
31.92 |
32.00 |
35.61 |
30.18 |
39.69 |
46.02 |
34.72 |
|
|
Comparison ratio |
0.45 |
0.59 |
0.40 |
0.45 |
0.29 |
0.63 |
0.15 |
0.59 |
0.39 |
|
|
Median weekly family income (1996 Census) |
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families ($) |
500 |
545 |
523 |
480 |
492 |
559 |
425 |
777 |
502 |
|
Other families ($) |
758 |
743 |
693 |
667 |
771 |
633 |
978 |
1029 |
736 |
|
|
Comparison ratio |
0.66 |
0.73 |
0.75 |
0.72 |
0.64 |
0.88 |
0.43 |
0.76 |
0.68 |
|
|
Attendees at child care services (1997-98) |
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children (%) |
1.4 |
0.5 |
2.4 |
1.2 |
2.7 |
0.8 |
14.5 |
0.8 |
1.6 |
|
Indigenous children as a proportion of all children(%) |
3.3 |
0.9 |
5.5 |
2.8 |
5.3 |
5.4 |
35.9 |
1.9 |
3.7 |
|
|
Comparison ratio |
0.42 |
0.56 |
0.44 |
0.43 |
0.51 |
0.15 |
0.40 |
0.42 |
0.43 |
|
|