Western Australian Consolidated Regulations Western Australian Consolidated Regulations (1) In this
regulation —
class , in relation to a non-SAT CEO, means the
classification of the officer determined by the Minister under a
classification system approved by the Minister under section 3(2) of the
Act;
non-SAT CEO means a chief executive officer whose
office is not a SAT office;
SAT office means an office referred to in
section 6(1)(d) or (e) of the Salaries and Allowances Act 1975 ;
Tribunal means the Salaries and Allowances
Tribunal established by the Salaries and Allowances Act 1975 .
(2) For the purposes
of section 57(1)(b) of the Act, the remuneration to be accorded a non-SAT
CEO under a contract of employment between the CEO and the CEO’s
employing authority must be in accordance with this regulation.
(3) Subject to
subregulations (6), (8) and (9), the remuneration to be accorded a
non-SAT CEO of a class referred to in Column 1 of the Table to this
subregulation must not exceed the remuneration determined by the Tribunal to
be paid to a SAT office-holder at a salary point, as described by the
Tribunal, specified in Column 2.
Table
|
Column 1 |
Column 2 |
|---|---|
|
Below class 1 |
Group 1 minimum |
|
Class 1 or Group 1 minimum |
Group 1 minimum |
|
Class 2 or Group 1 maximum |
Group 1 maximum |
|
Class 3 or Group 2 minimum |
Group 2 minimum |
|
Class 4 or Group 2 maximum |
Group 2 maximum |
|
Group 3 minimum |
Group 3 minimum |
|
Group 3 maximum |
Group 3 maximum |
|
Group 4 minimum |
Group 4 minimum |
|
Group 4 maximum |
Group 4 maximum |
(4) If the
remuneration to be paid to the SAT office-holder referred to in
subregulation (3) consists of more than one component, then each
component of the remuneration to be accorded the non-SAT CEO must not exceed
the corresponding component of the remuneration to be paid to the holder of
the SAT office.
(5) If a determination
of the Tribunal that is in force provides that the SAT office-holder referred
to in subregulation (3) is to be paid an allowance if the holder’s
performance in the office meets eligibility conditions determined by the
Tribunal ( personal merit allowance ), then the remuneration to be accorded
the non-SAT CEO may include an allowance, not exceeding that personal merit
allowance, to be paid if the non-SAT CEO’s employing authority is
satisfied that the CEO meets similar conditions.
(6) If the CEO’s
employing authority is satisfied that the remuneration otherwise payable under
this regulation would be insufficient in order to recruit and retain a
particular person as a particular non-SAT CEO, then —
(a)
subregulations (3) and (4) do not apply; and
(b) the
remuneration to be accorded that non-SAT CEO may be as determined by the
employing authority.
(7)
Subregulations (8) and (9) apply to a person who was employed in a
SAT office as a chief executive officer under a contract of employment but
before the contract of employment expired, was transferred under
section 50(1)(a)(ii) of the Act to the performance of other functions in
the Senior Executive Service.
(8) If a person is a
person to whom this subregulation applies, for the purpose of
section 57(1)(b) of the Act, the remuneration to be accorded the person
under a contract of employment entered into between the person and an
employing authority must not exceed the remuneration determined by the
Tribunal to be paid to a SAT office-holder at the salary point equivalent to
the salary point at which the person was remunerated immediately before he or
she ceased to hold the SAT office.
(9) If the
remuneration to be paid to the SAT office-holder referred to in
subregulation (8) consists of more than one component, then each
component of the remuneration to be accorded a person to whom this
subregulation applies must not exceed the corresponding component of the
remuneration to be paid to the holder of the SAT office.
[Regulation 8A inserted in Gazette
19 Nov 1999 p. 5792-4; amended in Gazette 5 Apr 2002
p. 1833-4; 16 Sep 2005 p. 4347-8.]