Western Australian Consolidated Acts

[Index] [Table] [Search] [Search this Act] [Notes] [Noteup] [Previous] [Next] [Download] [Help]

HERITAGE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA ACT 1990 - SECT 37

37 .         Recovery of moneys remitted in certain circumstances

        (1)         Subject to subsection (2), where — 

            (a)         an Order made under section 36 is varied or revoked;

            (b)         a place, or a portion of a place, is removed from the Register, or ceases to be the subject of a Heritage Agreement, as a consequence of an application by the owner; or

            (c)         at a place which is entered in the Register or is the subject of a Heritage Agreement — 

                  (i)         demolition of a building occurs;

                  (ii)         an alteration is made to a building; or

                  (iii)         any other development occurs,

                resulting in a person being convicted of a contravention of this Act, or in a person committing a contravention of a provision of a relevant Heritage Agreement, from which contravention the Minister alleges that a person liable to have paid such moneys has benefited unjustly,

                any land tax, Metropolitan Region Improvement Tax, rates or charges in respect of the land or other property affected for which a person would have been liable during a preceding period not exceeding 7 years had that liability not been remitted or reduced by the operation of this Division shall, where the Governor on the recommendation of the Minister after consultation with the Council by Order so requires, become payable by the person in whose favour the liability was so remitted or reduced, or the successor in title of that person, in accordance with the provisions of that Order.

        (2)         Before recommending the making of an Order under subsection (1) the Minister, by notice in writing, shall — 

            (a)         advise the person against whom the Order is to be made of any grounds upon which it is alleged that the person has benefited unjustly by — 

                  (i)         any contravention; or

                  (ii)         the remission or reduction,

                to which the proposed Order is to relate; and

            (b)         invite that person to show cause why the provisions of the Order should not have effect.

        (3)         A person aggrieved by a notice under subsection (2), may, within 30 days of the receipt of that notice, require the Minister to refer to the State Administrative Tribunal any question as to — 

            (a)         whether the variation or revocation of an Order made under section 36 has occasioned injustice;

            (b)         whether a contravention of the Act or of a provision of a relevant Heritage Agreement occurred and whether any person liable to have paid such moneys, or a successor in title of that person, thereby benefited; and

            (c)         whether, and to what extent, any person has benefited, or would be likely to benefit, unjustly by reason of any such contravention or of the remittance or reduction,

                and the State Administrative Tribunal may determine any such question.

        (4)         A recommendation for the making of an Order under subsection (2) shall not be inconsistent with any finding made by the State Administrative Tribunal on a reference in relation to the same or a related matter under subsection (3).

        (5)         The State Administrative Tribunal may for the purposes of this section — 

            (a)         in the case of a contravention of this Act, take judicial notice of the conviction of a person in respect of that contravention;

            (b)         determine on the balance of probabilities — 

                  (i)         in the case of an alleged contravention of a provision of a Heritage Agreement, whether the contravention occurred; and

                  (ii)         whether or not a person committed, or benefited from, any contravention;

            (c)         apportion liability, where land has ceased to be held or occupied by the person in whose favour the moneys due were reduced or remitted; and

            (d)         make such other order in the matter as the State Administrative Tribunal thinks fit.

        (6)         Where any of the things mentioned in subsection (1)(a), (b) or (c) occurs, the Valuer General may revalue, or cause to be revalued, any land or building to which the finding relates having regard to the tenor of that finding.

        (7)         Moneys payable by the operation of this section may be recovered, by the public authority to which they are owing or by the Council on behalf of that authority, as a debt due from the person in whose favour they were remitted or reduced, or from the successor in title to that person, in any court having jurisdiction in relation to a debt of that amount.

        (8)         Where — 

            (a)         moneys that would otherwise be payable to a public authority by a person other than the Council in respect of any place become, by reason of the operation of this Act, not so payable; and

            (b)         subsequently those moneys become payable by reason of this section and are thereafter received by the public authority from or on behalf of any person other than the Council,

                any moneys paid to the public authority by the Council in respect of a like liability shall be refunded by the public authority to the Council.

        [Section 37 amended by No. 55 of 2004 s. 502, 507 and 508.]



[Index] [Table] [Search] [Search this Act] [Notes] [Noteup] [Previous] [Next] [Download] [Help]