• Specific Year
    Any

FAMILY COURT ACT 1997 - SECT 205ZG

FAMILY COURT ACT 1997 - SECT 205ZG

205ZG .         Alteration of property interests — FLA s. 79

        (1)         In property settlement proceedings, the court may make such order as it considers appropriate —

            (a)         in the case of proceedings with respect to the property of the de facto partners, or either of them — altering the interests of the partners in the property; or

            (b)         in the case of proceedings with respect to the vested bankruptcy property in relation to a bankrupt de facto partner — altering the interests of the bankruptcy trustee in the vested bankruptcy property.

        (1A)         An order made under subsection (1) may include —

            (a)         an order for a settlement of property in substitution for any interest in the property; and

            (b)         an order requiring either or both of the de facto partners, or the relevant bankruptcy trustee (if any), to make, for the benefit of either or both of the de facto partners or a child of the de facto relationship, such settlement or transfer of property as the court determines.

        (2)         An order made under subsection (1) in property settlement proceedings may, after the death of 1 of the de facto partners, be enforced on behalf of, or against, as the case may be, the estate of the deceased party.

        (3)         The court must not make an order under this section unless it is satisfied that, in all the circumstances, it is just and equitable to make the order.

        (4)         In considering what order (if any) should be made under this section in property settlement proceedings the court must take into account —

            (a)         the financial contribution made directly or indirectly by or on behalf of a de facto partner or a child of the de facto relationship to the acquisition, conservation or improvement of any of the property of the de facto partners, or either of them, or otherwise in relation to any of that last-mentioned property, whether or not that last-mentioned property has, since the making of the contribution, ceased to be the property of the de facto partners or either of them; and

            (b)         the contribution (other than a financial contribution) made directly or indirectly by or on behalf of a de facto partner or a child of the de facto relationship to the acquisition, conservation or improvement of any of the property of the de facto partners or either of them, or otherwise in relation to any of that last-mentioned property, whether or not that last-mentioned property has, since the making of the contribution, ceased to be the property of the de facto partners or either of them; and

            (c)         the contribution made by a de facto partner to the welfare of the family constituted by the de facto partners and any children of the de facto partners, including any contribution made in the capacity of homemaker or parent; and

            (d)         the effect of any proposed order upon the earning capacity of either de facto partner; and

            (e)         the matters referred to in section 205ZD(3) so far as they are relevant; and

            (f)         any other order made under this Act affecting a de facto partner or a child of the de facto relationship; and

            (g)         any child support under the Child Support (Assessment) Act that a de facto partner has provided, is to provide, or might be liable to provide in the future, for a child of the de facto relationship.

        (5)         Subsection (5A) applies if, in property settlement proceedings, a court is of the opinion —

            (a)         that there is likely to be a significant change in the financial circumstances of the de facto partners, or either of them and that, having regard to the time when that change is likely to take place, it is reasonable to adjourn the proceedings; and

            (b)         that, if that significant change in financial circumstances occurs, an order that the court could make with respect to the following matters is more likely to do justice as between the de facto partners than an order that the court could make immediately with respect to those following matters —

                  (i)         the property of the de facto partners, or either of them;

                  (ii)         the vested bankruptcy property in relation to a bankrupt de facto partner.

        (5A)         Without limiting the power of any court to grant an adjournment in proceedings under this Act, the court may, if so requested by either de facto partner or the relevant bankruptcy trustee (if any), adjourn the proceedings until such time, before the expiration of a period specified by the court, as that de facto partner or the relevant bankruptcy trustee, as the case may be, applies for the proceedings to be determined, but nothing in this subsection requires the court to adjourn any proceedings in any particular circumstances.

        (6)         Where a court proposes to adjourn proceedings as provided by subsection (5A), the court may, before so adjourning the proceedings, make such interim order or orders or such other order or orders (if any) as it considers appropriate with respect to —

            (a)         any of the property of the de facto partners, or of either of them; or

            (b)         any of the vested bankruptcy property in relation to a bankrupt de facto partner.

        (7)         The court may, in forming an opinion for the purposes of subsection (5) as to whether there is likely to be a significant change in the financial circumstances of either or both of the de facto partners, have regard to any change in the financial circumstances of a de facto partner that may occur by reason that the partner —

            (a)         is a contributor to a superannuation fund or scheme, or participates in any scheme or arrangement that is in the nature of a superannuation scheme; or

            (b)         may become entitled to property as the result of the exercise in his or her favour, by the trustee of a discretionary trust, of a power to distribute trust property,

                but nothing in this subsection is to be taken to limit the circumstances in which the court may form the opinion that there is likely to be a significant change in the financial circumstances of a de facto partner.

        (8)         Where, before property settlement proceedings are completed, either de facto partner dies —

            (a)         the proceedings may be continued by or against, as the case may be, the legal personal representative of the deceased party and the applicable rules may make provision in relation to the substitution of the legal personal representative as a party to the proceedings; and

            (b)         if the court is of the opinion that it would have made an order with respect to property if the deceased party had not died, and that it is still appropriate to make an order with respect to property, the court may make such order as it considers appropriate with respect to —

                  (i)         any of the property of the de facto partners, or either of them; or

                  (ii)         any of the vested bankruptcy property in relation to a bankrupt de facto partner;

                and

            (c)         an order made by the court pursuant to paragraph (b) may be enforced on behalf of, or against, as the case may be, the estate of the deceased party.

        (9)         A court must not make an order under this section in property settlement proceedings (other than an order until further order or an order made with the consent of all the parties to the proceedings) unless —

            (a)         the parties to the proceedings have attended a conference in relation to the matter to which the proceedings relate with the Principal Registrar, a registrar or a deputy registrar; or

            (b)         the court is satisfied that, having regard to the need to make an order urgently, or to any other special circumstance, it is appropriate to make the order notwithstanding that the parties to the proceedings have not attended a conference as mentioned in paragraph (a); or

            (c)         the court is satisfied that it is not practicable to require the parties to the proceedings to attend a conference as mentioned in paragraph (a).

        (10)         The following are entitled to become a party to proceedings in which an application is made for an order under this section —

            (a)         a creditor of a party to the proceedings if the creditor may not be able to recover the creditor’s debt if the order were made;

            (b)         any other person whose interests would be affected by the making of the order.

        (11)         Subsection (10) does not apply to a creditor of a party to the proceedings —

            (a)         if the party is a bankrupt, to the extent to which the debt is a provable debt (within the meaning of the Bankruptcy Act); or

            (b)         if the party is a debtor subject to a personal insolvency agreement, to the extent to which the debt is covered by the personal insolvency agreement.

        (12)         Subsection (13) applies if —

            (a)         an application is made for an order under this section in proceedings between de facto partners with respect to the property of the de facto partners, or either of them; and

            (b)         either of the following subparagraphs apply to a de facto partner —

                  (i)         when the application was made, the de facto partner was a bankrupt;

                  (ii)         after the application was made but before it is finally determined, the de facto partner became a bankrupt;

                and

            (c)         the bankruptcy trustee applies to the court to be joined as a party to the proceedings; and

            (d)         the court is satisfied that the interests of the bankrupt’s creditors may be affected by the making of an order under this section in the proceedings.

        (13)         The court must join the bankruptcy trustee as a party to the proceedings.

        (14)         If a bankruptcy trustee is a party to property settlement proceedings, then, except with the leave of the court, the bankrupt de facto partner is not entitled to make a submission to the court in connection with any vested bankruptcy property in relation to the bankrupt partner.

        (15)         The court must not grant leave under subsection (14) unless the court is satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances.

        (16)         Subsection (17) applies if —

            (a)         an application is made for an order under this section in proceedings between de facto partners with respect to the property of the de facto partners, or either of them; and

            (b)         either of the following subparagraphs apply to a de facto partner (the debtor party ) —

                  (i)         when the application was made, the de facto partner was a debtor subject to a personal insolvency agreement;

                  (ii)         after the application was made but before it is finally determined, the de facto partner becomes a debtor subject to a personal insolvency agreement;

                and

            (c)         the trustee of the agreement applies to the court to be joined as a party to the proceedings; and

            (d)         the court is satisfied that the interests of the debtor party’s creditors may be affected by the making of an order under this section in the proceedings.

        (17)         The court must join the trustee of the agreement as a party to the proceedings.

        (18)         If the trustee of a personal insolvency agreement is a party to property settlement proceedings, then, except with the leave of the court, the de facto partner who is the debtor subject to the personal insolvency agreement is not entitled to make a submission to the court in connection with any property subject to the agreement.

        (19)         The court must not grant leave under subsection (18) unless the court is satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances.

        (20)         For the purposes of subsections (12) and (16), an application for an order under this section is taken to be finally determined when —

            (a)         the application is withdrawn or dismissed; or

            (b)         an order (other than an interim order) is made as a result of the application.

        [Section 205ZG inserted: No. 25 of 2002 s. 47; amended: No. 28 of 2022 s. 17.]