• Specific Year
    Any

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT 1986 - SECT 73A

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT 1986 - SECT 73A

73A .         Prevention notices, issue and effect of

        (1)         If an inspector or authorised person reasonably suspects that —

            (a)         any waste has been or is being discharged from any premises otherwise than in accordance with a works approval, licence or requirement contained in a closure notice or an environmental protection notice; or

            (b)         a condition of pollution is likely to arise or has arisen; or

            (c)         a person has done, is doing, or is likely to do, an act in contravention of section 50A or 50B,

                the inspector or authorised person may, with the approval of the CEO, give a notice (a prevention notice ) to such person as the inspector or authorised person considers appropriate.

        (2)         A prevention notice may require the person to whom the notice is given —

            (a)         to remove, disperse, destroy, dispose of or otherwise deal with the waste which has been or is being discharged; or

            (b)         to prevent the condition of pollution from arising or control or abate that condition if it arises; or

            (c)         to prevent the act referred to in subsection (1)(c) or control or abate the environmental harm if it arises,

                as the case requires and is to describe the action the inspector or authorised person considers appropriate to achieve that result.

        (3)         When a person has complied with any requirements contained in a prevention notice given to the person under subsection (1), the CEO is to, if the person was not —

            (a)         the occupier of the premises from which the relevant waste was discharged at the time of that discharge; or

            (b)         the person who caused or allowed to be caused —

                  (i)         the discharge referred to in paragraph (a); or

                  (ii)         the likelihood of the relevant condition referred to in subsection (1)(b) arising or the arising of that condition; or

                  (iii)         the likelihood of the relevant act referred to in subsection (1)(c) occurring or the occurrence of that act,

                as the case requires, reimburse the person any cost incurred by the person in complying with those requirements.

        (4)         When the CEO has reimbursed any cost under subsection (3), the CEO may recover that cost from the person who —

            (a)         was the occupier of the premises from which the relevant waste was discharged at the time of that discharge; or

            (b)         caused or allowed to be caused —

                  (i)         the discharge referred to in paragraph (a); or

                  (ii)         the likelihood of the relevant condition referred to in subsection (1)(b) arising or the arising of that condition; or

                  (iii)         the likelihood of the relevant act referred to in subsection (1)(c) occurring or the occurrence of that act,

                as the case requires, by action in a court of competent jurisdiction as a debt due to the Crown.

        (5)         Any cost recovered under subsection (4) is to be paid into the Consolidated Account.

        (6)         A person who intentionally or with criminal negligence does not comply with a requirement contained in a prevention notice given to that person, without reasonable excuse for that contravention, commits an offence.

        (7)         A person who does not comply with a requirement contained in a prevention notice given to that person, without reasonable excuse for that contravention, commits an offence.

        (8)         A person charged with committing an offence against subsection (6) may be convicted of an offence against subsection (7) which is established by the evidence.

        [Section 73A inserted: No. 54 of 2003 s. 52; amended: No. 77 of 2006 s. 4.]