Queensland Consolidated Regulations Queensland Consolidated Regulations(1) For this section, an IAP service provider does not know or suspect an approved intelligent transport system has malfunctioned only because the IAP service provider has--
(a) accessed a report made by an approved intelligent transport system, including a report contained in a noncompliance report, of the electronic detection of malfunctioning of the system; or
(b) analysed information generated by an approved intelligent transport system.
(2) An IAP service provider commits an offence if the IAP service provider--
(a) either--
(i) knows that an approved intelligent transport system fitted to an IAP vehicle has malfunctioned; or
(ii) has reasonable grounds to suspect that an approved intelligent transport system fitted to an IAP vehicle has malfunctioned; and
(b) does not report the malfunction or suspected malfunction, in a way complying with subsection (4), to the chief executive immediately.
Maximum penalty--60 penalty units.
(3) An IAP service provider commits an offence if the IAP service provider--
(a) either--
(i) knows that an approved intelligent transport system, other than an approved intelligent transport system fitted to an IAP vehicle, has malfunctioned; or
(ii) has reasonable grounds to suspect that an approved intelligent transport system, other than an approved intelligent transport system fitted to an IAP vehicle has malfunctioned; and
(b) does not report the malfunction or suspected malfunction, in a way complying with subsection (4), to TCA immediately.
Maximum penalty--60 penalty units.
(4) A report under subsection (2)(b) or (3)(b) must be in the form approved for the purpose by TCA, if any.
(5) TCA must make a form approved under subsection (4) available on the IAP website.