(1) The Supreme Court must, on an application under section 89F, make an
unexplained wealth order against a person if it is satisfied there is a
reasonable suspicion that—
(a) the person—
(i) has engaged in 1 or more
serious crime related activities; or
(5) For subsection (4) , an
affidavit by an appropriate officer that includes a statement that the officer
has made due enquiry and is satisfied that no action has been taken under a
law of the Commonwealth or any place outside Queensland, including outside
Australia, against any property in relation to the proceeds of the
external serious crime related activity is proof, in the absence of evidence
to the contrary, of the matters contained in the affidavit.
(6) The court may
make the ancillary orders the court considers appropriate when it makes the
unexplained wealth order or at a later time.