New South Wales Consolidated Regulations

SYDNEY REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL PLAN NO 24--HOMEBUSH BAY AREA - REG 9A

9A Exempt development

(1) Development is exempt development for the purposes of this plan:

(a) in the case of development carried out on land shown uncoloured on the map marked “ Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No 24-Homebush Bay Area-Amendment No 2-Map 4 ”, if it is exempt development for the purposes of State Environmental Planning Policy No 60-Exempt and Complying Development ,

(b) in the case of development carried out on land coloured light pink on the map marked “ Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No 24-Homebush Bay Area-Amendment No 2-Map 4 ”, if:

(i) it is described in Schedule 9, and

(ii) it meets the standards for development contained in Schedule 9 (including the standards referred to as “prescribed criteria”), and

(iii) it complies with the requirements of subclause (2).

(2) Development referred to in subclause (1) (b) complies with the requirements of this subclause if:

(a) the development is of minimal environmental impact, and

(b) the development complies with any deemed-to-satisfy provisions of the Building Code of Australia relevant to the development, and

(c) the development complies with any relevant Australian Standard, and

(d) the development is not located on land that is critical habitat (within the meaning of the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 or the Fisheries Management Act 1994 ), and

(e) the development is not located on land that is identified as primary habitat for the Green and Golden Bell Frog in the SOPA Frog Management Plan, and

(f) the development does not encroach upon any easement or right of way unless agreed to in writing by the person or authority in whose favour the easement exists, and

(g) the development does not contravene any conditions of a development consent currently operating on the land, and

(h) the development is not likely to result in the disturbance of more than one tonne of soil, or to lower the water table, on land on which acid sulfate soils are present, and

(i) it relates to significantly contaminated land within the meaning of the Contaminated Land Management Act 1997 , the development complies with the terms of an approved voluntary management proposal under that Act, and

(j) it is located within 3 metres of a public water or sewer main, the development complies with any requirements of the Sydney Water Corporation, and

(k) it relates to an existing building, the development is not such that would require changes to the existing fire safety measures, and

(l) the development has been endorsed by the Sydney Olympic Park Authority:

(i) as being structurally sound, and

(ii) as meeting the requirements of paragraphs (a)-(k), and

(iii) as meeting the standards for development contained in Schedule 9 (including the standards referred to as “prescribed criteria”).

(3) Development meets the standards referred to in Schedule 9 as “prescribed criteria” if:

(a) the development is consistent with any relevant master plan, and

(b) the development is consistent with any guidelines and management strategies adopted by the Sydney Olympic Park Authority, and

(c) the development is consistent with any plan of management for the Millennium Parklands adopted by the Sydney Olympic Park Authority, and

(d) in the case of development that affects any land or building that is, or is part of, an item of environmental heritage or an item listed on the State Heritage Register under the Heritage Act 1977 :

(i) a heritage conservation management plan or conservation management master plan has been endorsed by the Heritage Council in respect of the land or building, and

(ii) the development is consistent with that plan, and

(e) the development is consistent with the SOPA Frog Management Plan.