New South Wales Consolidated Acts
[Index]
[Table]
[Search]
[Search this Act]
[Notes]
[Noteup]
[Previous]
[Next]
[Download]
[History]
[Help]
WATER MANAGEMENT ACT 2000 - SECT 367B
Rebuttable presumptions
367B Rebuttable presumptions
(1) In any proceedings for an offence against this Act or the regulations
being taken against a landholder: (a) the fact that a water management work is
or has been located: (i) on the landholder’s land, or
(ii) in a river or
lake within the landholder’s land,
gives rise to a rebuttable presumption
that the work was constructed by the landholder, and
(b) the fact that a
water management work is being or has been used: (i) on the landholder’s
land, or
(ii) in a river or lake within the landholder’s land,
gives rise
to a rebuttable presumption that the work is being or has been used by the
landholder, and
(c) the fact that water is being or has been taken from a
water source by means of a water supply work situated: (i) on the
landholder’s land, or
(ii) in a river or lake within the landholder’s
land,
gives rise to a rebuttable presumption that the water is being or has
been taken by the landholder, and
(d) the fact that water is being or has
been discharged into a water source by means of a drainage work situated on
the landholder’s land gives rise to a rebuttable presumption that the water
is being or has been discharged by the landholder, and
(e) the fact that
water is being or has been used on the landholder’s land gives rise to a
rebuttable presumption that the water is being or has been used by the
landholder, and
(f) the fact that a controlled activity is being or has been
carried out on waterfront land within the landholder’s land gives rise to a
rebuttable presumption that the activity is being or has been carried out by
the landholder, and
(g) the fact that an aquifer interference activity is
being or has been carried out on the landholder’s land gives rise to a
rebuttable presumption that the activity is being or has been carried out by
the landholder.
(2) In any proceedings for an offence against this Act or the
regulations being taken against the holder of an approval for a
water supply work, the fact that water is being or has been taken from a water
source: (a) by means of the work, or
(b) through metering equipment installed
in connection with the work,
gives rise to a rebuttable presumption that the
holder of the approval is or has been using the work to take water from that
water source.
(3) In any proceedings for an offence against this Act or the
regulations, the fact that a work of the kind referred to in: (a) the
definition of
"drainage work" in the Dictionary, or
(b) paragraph (a), (b) or (c) of the
definition of
"water supply work" in the Dictionary,
is capable of being used for the
purpose referred to in that provision gives rise to a rebuttable presumption
that the work has been constructed or used for that purpose.
(4) This section
does not limit the operation of section 60E or 91L.
AustLII: Copyright Policy
| Disclaimers
| Privacy Policy
| Feedback