New South Wales Consolidated Acts
[Index]
[Table]
[Search]
[Search this Act]
[Notes]
[Noteup]
[Previous]
[Next]
[Download]
[History]
[Help]
TRADE MEASUREMENT ACT 1989 - SECT 34
Defences concerning short measure
34 Defences concerning short measure
(1) It is a defence in proceedings under section 32 against a person who packs
a pre-packed article if it is established that the deficiency in measurement:
(a) arose after the packing of the article and the marking of the package and
was attributable wholly to factors for which reasonable allowance was made in
stating the measurement marked on the package, or
(b) resulted from something
that the defendant could not reasonably have foreseen or for which the
defendant could not reasonably have made allowance.
(2) It is a defence in
proceedings under section 32 against a person who sells a pre-packed article
if it is established: (a) that the defendant obtained the article from another
person within Australia who packed the article or sold it to the defendant and
the defendant identified that other person to an inspector,
(b) that the
package containing the article was marked apparently as required by this Act
when the defendant received it, and
(c) that the defendant sold the article
in the same state as it was in when the defendant obtained it.
(3) The
defence under subsection (2) is not available to a defendant in relation to
the sale of a pre-packed article (
"the offending article") if: (a) a finding by an inspector in relation to
another pre-packed article sold by the defendant indicated that its sale would
have been an offence under section 32 had that defence not been available,
(b) that other pre-packed article was of the same kind, and had the same
measurement marked on the package, as the offending article, and
(c) the
inspector informed the defendant of that finding before the sale of
the offending article,
unless the defendant establishes that
the offending article was not in the defendant’s possession when the
defendant was informed of the inspector’s finding.
(4) It is not a defence
in proceedings under section 32 merely to establish that the deficiency in
measurement did not exist when the article was packed or when the package was
marked.
[Index]
[Table]
[Search]
[Search this Act]
[Notes]
[Noteup]
[Previous]
[Next]
[Download]
[History]
[Help]