New South Wales Consolidated Acts
[Index]
[Table]
[Search]
[Search this Act]
[Notes]
[Noteup]
[Previous]
[Next]
[Download]
[History]
[Help]
NEW SOUTH WALES CRIME COMMISSION ACT 1985 - SECT 18B
Privilege concerning answers and documents
18B Privilege concerning answers and documents
(1) A witness summoned to attend or appearing before the Commission at a
hearing is not (except as provided by section 18A) excused from answering any
question or producing any document or thing on the ground that the answer or
production may incriminate or tend to incriminate the witness, or on any other
ground of privilege, or on the ground of a duty of secrecy or other
restriction on disclosure, or on any other ground.
(2) An answer made, or
document or thing produced, by a witness at a hearing before the Commission is
not (except as otherwise provided in this section) admissible in evidence
against the person in any civil or criminal proceedings or in any disciplinary
proceedings.
(3) Nothing in this section makes inadmissible: (a) any answer,
document or thing in proceedings for an offence against this Act or in
proceedings for contempt under this Act, or
(b) any answer, document or thing
in any civil or criminal proceedings or in any disciplinary proceedings if the
witness does not object to giving the answer or producing the document or
other thing irrespective of the provisions of subsection (1), or
(c) any
document in any civil proceedings for or in respect of any right or liability
conferred or imposed by the document or thing, or
(d) any answer made, or
document or thing produced, by a corporation at a hearing before the
Commission, or
(e) any answer, document or thing in a proceeding for the
falsity of evidence given by the witness.
(4) If: (a) a legal practitioner or
other person is required to answer a question or produce a document or thing
at a hearing before the Commission, and
(b) the answer to the question would
disclose, or the document or thing contains, a privileged communication
passing between a legal practitioner (in his or her capacity as a
legal practitioner) and a person,
the legal practitioner or other person is
entitled to refuse to comply with the requirement, unless the privilege is
waived by a person having authority to do so. However, the legal practitioner
must, if so required by the member presiding at the hearing, furnish to the
Commission the name and address of the person to whom or by whom the
communication was made.
(5) The member presiding at the hearing may declare
that all or any classes of answers given by a witness or that all or any
classes of documents or other things produced by a witness will be regarded as
having been given or produced on objection by the witness, and there is
accordingly no need for the witness to make an objection in respect of each
such answer, document or other thing.
AustLII: Copyright Policy
| Disclaimers
| Privacy Policy
| Feedback