New South Wales Consolidated Acts
[Index]
[Table]
[Search]
[Search this Act]
[Notes]
[Noteup]
[Previous]
[Next]
[Download]
[Help]
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT ACT 1979 - SECT 79B
Consultation and concurrence
79B Consultation and concurrence
(1) General If, by an
environmental planning instrument, the consent authority, before determining
the development application, is required to consult with or to obtain the
concurrence of a person, the consent authority must, in accordance with the
environmental planning instrument and the regulations, consult with or obtain
the concurrence of the person, unless the consent authority determines to
refuse to grant development consent.
(2) However, if, by an
environmental planning instrument, the Minister, before determining a
development application, is required to obtain the concurrence of a person,
the Minister is required only to consult with the person.
(3) Consultation
and concurrence-threatened species Development consent cannot be granted for:
(a) development on land that is, or is a part of, critical habitat, or
(b)
development that is likely to significantly affect a threatened species,
population, or ecological community, or its habitat,
without the concurrence
of the Director-General of National Parks and Wildlife or, if a Minister is
the consent authority, unless the Minister has consulted with the Minister
administering the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 . Note: If a
biobanking statement has been issued in respect of the development under Part
7A of the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 , the development is taken
not to significantly affect threatened species, populations or ecological
communities, or their habitats.
(4) Despite subsection (3), if the Minister
administering the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 considers that it
is appropriate, that Minister may: (a) elect to act in place of the
Director-General of National Parks and Wildlife for the purposes of that
subsection, or
(b) review and amend any recommendations that that
Director-General proposes to make, or any advice that that Director-General
proposes to offer, for the purposes of that subsection.
(5) In deciding
whether or not concurrence should be granted under subsection (3), the
Director-General of National Parks and Wildlife or the Minister administering
the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 must take the following matters
into consideration: (a) any species impact statement that accompanied the
development application,
(b) any assessment report prepared by the
consent authority,
(c) any submissions received concerning the
development application,
(d) any relevant recovery plan or
threat abatement plan,
(e) whether the development proposed is likely to
reduce the long-term viability of the species, population or
ecological community in the region,
(f) whether the development is likely to
accelerate the extinction of the species, population or ecological community
or place it at risk of extinction,
(g) the principles of
ecologically sustainable development,
(h) the likely social and economic
consequences of granting or of not granting concurrence.
(6) The Minister
administering the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 must provide the
Minister who is the consent authority with any recommendations made by the
Director-General of National Parks and Wildlife concerning determination of a
development application relating to development referred to in subsection (3)
and, if that Minister does not accept any one or more of the recommendations,
that Minister must include in the determination the recommendations not
accepted and that Minister’s reasons for not accepting them.
(7) A copy of
the reasons referred to in subsection (6) must be available for public
inspection, during ordinary office hours, at the head office of the National
Parks and Wildlife Service.
(8) Granting or refusal of concurrence A person
whose concurrence to development is required may: (a) grant concurrence to the
development, either unconditionally or subject to conditions, or
(b) refuse
concurrence to the development.
In deciding whether to grant concurrence, the
person must take into consideration only the matters stated pursuant to
section 30 (3) and applicable to the development (unless the relevant
environmental planning instrument is a deemed instrument referred to in
Division 2 of Part 21 of Schedule 6).
(9) Giving effect to concurrence A
consent authority that grants consent to the carrying out of development for
which a concurrence has been granted must grant the consent subject to any
conditions of the concurrence. This does not affect the right of the
consent authority to impose conditions under section 80A not inconsistent with
the conditions of the concurrence or to refuse consent.
(10) Avoidance of
consents subject to concurrence If, by an environmental planning instrument or
by subsection (3), a development application may not be determined by the
granting of consent without the concurrence of a specified person, a consent
granted: (a) without that concurrence, or
(b) not subject to any conditions
of the concurrence,
is, subject to sections 102-104, voidable.
(11) However,
if the specified person fails to inform the consent authority of the decision
concerning concurrence within the time allowed for doing so, the
consent authority may determine the development application without the
concurrence of the specified person and a development consent so granted is
not voidable on that ground.
(12) Nothing in this section affects any
liability of a consent authority in respect of a consent granted as referred
to in subsection (10) (a) or (b).
[Index]
[Table]
[Search]
[Search this Act]
[Notes]
[Noteup]
[Previous]
[Next]
[Download]
[Help]