(1) A direction may not be given so as to direct the attendance of an alleged
victim of an offence involving violence that is the subject of the
committal proceedings (even if the parties to the proceedings consent to the
attendance) unless the Magistrate is satisfied that there are special reasons
why the alleged victim should, in the interests of justice, attend to give
oral evidence.
(1A) In committal proceedings for an offence involving
violence, a direction may not be given so as to direct a vulnerable person
whose evidence is referred to in the brief of evidence to give evidence orally
unless--
(a) the Magistrate is satisfied that there are special reasons why
the vulnerable person should, in the interests of justice, attend to give
evidence, or
(g) an
offence the elements of which include the commission of, or an intention to
commit, an offence referred to in any of the above paragraphs,
(h) an offence
that, at the time it was committed, was an offence involving violence for the
purposes of this section,
(h1) an offence under any law of the Commonwealth
that corresponds to an offence referred to in paragraph (a)-(h) and that is
prescribed by the regulations,
(i) any other offence that involves an act of
actual or threatened violence and that is prescribed by the regulations for
the purposes of this section.
(4) An offence that may be dealt with summarily
under Chapter 5 is not an offence involving violence for the purposes of this
section.
(5) Despite section 85 (4), the Magistrate must not allow a person
who is an alleged victim of an offence involving violence to be cross-examined
in respect of matters that were not the basis of the reasons for giving the
direction, unless the Magistrate is satisfied that there are special reasons
why, in the interests of justice, the person should be cross-examined in
respect of those matters.