New South Wales Consolidated Acts
[Index]
[Table]
[Search]
[Search this Act]
[Notes]
[Noteup]
[Previous]
[Next]
[Download]
[Help]
APIARIES ACT 1985 - SECT 44
Evidentiary provisions
44 Evidentiary provisions
(1) If in any proceedings taken under this Act a person asserts that that
person is an inspector, it shall be presumed, in the absence of evidence to
the contrary, that that person was duly appointed as an inspector.
(2) A copy
of any order, certificate, direction, notice or other instrument made, issued
or given for the purposes of this Act purporting to be certified by the
Director-General as a true copy of the original instrument is admissible in
evidence in any proceedings under this Act to the same extent as that original
instrument.
(3) A certificate by the Director-General that: (a) a specified
person is or is not a registered beekeeper or was or was not a registered
beekeeper at a specified time,
(b) the keeping of bees or the establishment
of an apiary on specified premises is prohibited or was prohibited at a
specified time,
(c) a specified area was, at a specified time, declared to be
an infected area or that, at a specified time, specified premises were within
such an area, or
(d) specified land was, at a specified time, declared to be
a quarantine area or a prohibited area under or for the purposes of a
specified provision of this Act,
is admissible in evidence in any proceedings
under this Act, and, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, shall be
proof of its contents.
(4) All judges, magistrates and other persons acting
judicially shall take judicial notice of the signature of the Director-General
to any certificate issued under subsection (3).
(5) Where in any proceedings
it is proved that a beehive containing bees was found on any specified
premises at a specified time, it shall be presumed, in the absence of evidence
to the contrary, that those bees were kept by the person who was the occupier
of those premises at that time.
(6) Where in proceedings taken against a
beekeeper for an offence against section 22 it is proved that the bees to
which the proceedings relate had been infected with a notifiable disease for a
period of 7 days or more, then, for the purposes of those proceedings, it
shall be presumed, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, that the
beekeeper was at the end of that period aware that the bees were so infected.
[Index]
[Table]
[Search]
[Search this Act]
[Notes]
[Noteup]
[Previous]
[Next]
[Download]
[Help]