• Specific Year
    Any

SURVEILLANCE DEVICES ACT 2004 - SECT 16 Determining the application

SURVEILLANCE DEVICES ACT 2004 - SECT 16

Determining the application

  (1)   An eligible Judge or a nominated AAT member may issue a surveillance device warrant if satisfied:

  (a)   in the case of a warrant sought in relation to a relevant offence--that there are reasonable grounds for the suspicion founding the application for the warrant; and

  (b)   in the case of a warrant sought in relation to a recovery order--that such an order is in force and that there are reasonable grounds for the suspicion founding the application for the warrant; and

  (ba)   in the case of a warrant sought in relation to an international assistance authorisation--that such an authorisation is in force and that there are reasonable grounds for the suspicion founding the application for the warrant; and

  (bb)   in the case of a warrant sought for the purposes of an integrity operation--that the integrity authority for the operation is in effect, and that there are reasonable grounds for the suspicions founding the application for the warrant (as mentioned in paragraphs 14(3B)(a) and (b)); and

  (bba)   in the case of a warrant sought to determine whether to apply for a post - sentence order--that the conditions in paragraphs 14(3BA)(a), (b) and (d) are met, and that there are reasonable grounds for the suspicions founding the application for the warrant (as mentioned in paragraphs 14(3BA)(c) and (e)); and

  (bc)   in the case of a warrant sought in relation to a Part   5.3 supervisory order that is in force in relation to a person--that the order is in force in relation to the person, and that there are reasonable grounds for the suspicion founding the application for the warrant (as mentioned in paragraph   14(3C)(b)); and

  (bd)   in the case of a warrant sought to determine whether to apply for a Part   9.10 order--that the conditions in paragraphs 14(3D)(a) and (c) are met, and that there are reasonable grounds for the suspicions founding the application for the warrant (as mentioned in paragraphs 14(3D)(b) and (d)); and

  (be)   in the case of a warrant sought in relation to a community safety supervision order that is in force in relation to a person--that the order is in force in relation to the person, and that there are reasonable grounds for the suspicion founding the application for the warrant (as mentioned in paragraph   14(3E)(b)); and

  (c)   in the case of an unsworn application--that it would have been impracticable for an affidavit to have been sworn or prepared before the application was made; and

  (d)   in the case of a remote application--that it would have been impracticable for the application to have been made in person.

Note:   For Part   5.3 supervisory orders that have been made but not come into force, see section   6C. For community safety supervision orders that have been made but not come into force, see section   6E.

  (2)   In determining whether a surveillance device warrant should be issued, the eligible Judge or nominated AAT member must have regard to:

  (a)   in the case of a warrant sought in relation to a relevant offence or an international assistance authorisation, or for the purposes of an integrity operation--the nature and gravity of the alleged offence; and

  (b)   in the case of a warrant sought to assist in the location and safe recovery of a child to whom a recovery order relates--the circumstances that gave rise to the making of the order; and

  (c)   the extent to which the privacy of any person is likely to be affected; and

  (d)   the existence of any alternative means of obtaining the evidence or information sought to be obtained; and

  (e)   in the case of a warrant sought in relation to a relevant offence or a recovery order, or for the purposes of an integrity operation--the likely evidentiary or intelligence value of any evidence or information sought to be obtained; and

  (ea)   in the case of a warrant sought in relation to an international assistance authorisation--the likely evidentiary or intelligence value of any evidence or information sought to be obtained, to the extent that this is possible to determine from information obtained from the international entity to which the authorisation relates; and

  (f)   in the case of a warrant sought in relation to a relevant offence or a recovery order--any previous warrant sought or issued under this Division in connection with the same alleged offence or the same recovery order.

  (3)   In addition to the matters in subsection   (2), in determining whether to issue a surveillance device warrant sought to determine whether to apply for a post - sentence order in relation to a person, the eligible Judge or nominated AAT member must have regard to:

  (a)   the likely value of the information sought to be obtained in determining whether to apply for the post - sentence order; and

  (b)   any previous application for a surveillance device warrant sought or issued to determine whether to apply for a post - sentence order in relation to the person.

  (3A)   In addition to the matters in subsection   (2), in determining whether to issue a surveillance device warrant sought to determine whether to apply for a Part   9.10 order in relation to a person, the eligible Judge or nominated AAT member must have regard to:

  (a)   the likely value of the information sought to be obtained in determining whether to apply for the Part   9.10 order; and

  (b)   any previous application for a surveillance device warrant sought or issued to determine whether to apply for a Part   9.10 order in relation to the person.

  (4)   In addition to the matters in subsection   (2), in determining whether to issue a surveillance device warrant sought in a case where a Part   5.3 supervisory order is in force in relation to a person, the eligible Judge or nominated AAT member must have regard to:

  (a)   the likely value of the information sought to be obtained, in:

  (i)   achieving a Part   5.3 object; or

  (ii)   determining whether the Part   5.3 supervisory order, or any succeeding Part   5.3 supervisory order, has been, or is being, complied with; and

  (b)   whether the use of the surveillance device in accordance with the warrant would be the means of obtaining the evidence or information sought to be obtained, that is likely to have the least interference with any person's privacy; and

  (c)   if the order is a control order:

  (i)   the possibility that the person has engaged, is engaging, or will engage, in a terrorist act; or

  (ii)   the possibility that the person has provided, is providing, or will provide, support for a terrorist act; or

  (iii)   the possibility that the person has facilitated, is facilitating, or will facilitate, a terrorist act; or

  (iv)   the possibility that the person has provided, is providing, or will provide, support for the engagement in a hostile activity in a foreign country; or

  (v)   the possibility that the person has facilitated, is facilitating, or will facilitate, the engagement in a hostile activity in a foreign country; and

  (d)   if the order is an extended supervision order or interim supervision order--the possibility that the person has committed, is committing, or will commit, a serious Part   5.3 offence; and

  (e)   in relation to any Part   5.3 supervisory order--the possibility that the person has contravened, is contravening, or will contravene, the order or a succeeding Part   5.3 supervisory order; and

  (f)   any previous surveillance device warrant sought or issued on the basis of a Part   5.3 supervisory order that is or was in force in relation to the person.

  (5)   In addition to the matters in subsection   (2), in determining whether to issue a surveillance device warrant sought in a case where a community safety supervision order is in force in relation to a person, the eligible Judge or nominated AAT member must have regard to:

  (a)   the likely value of the information sought to be obtained, in:

  (i)   achieving a Part   9.10 object; or

  (ii)   determining whether the community safety supervision order, or any succeeding community safety supervision order, has been, or is being, complied with; and

  (b)   whether the use of the surveillance device in accordance with the warrant would be the means of obtaining the evidence or information sought to be obtained, that is likely to have the least interference with any person's privacy; and

  (c)   the possibility that the person has committed, is committing, or will commit, a serious violent or sexual offence; and

  (d)   the possibility that the person has contravened, is contravening, or will contravene, the community safety supervision order or a succeeding community safety supervision order; and

  (e)   any previous surveillance device warrant sought or issued on the basis of a community safety supervision order that is or was in force in relation to the person.