Commonwealth of Australia Bills[Index] [Search] [Download] [Related Items] [Help]
This is a Bill, not an Act. For current law, see the Acts databases.
2002
The Parliament of
the
Commonwealth of
Australia
THE
SENATE
Presented and read a first
time
Family Law Amendment
(Joint Residency) Bill 2002
No. ,
2002
(Senator
Harris)
A Bill for an Act to amend
the Family Law Act 1975, and for related purposes
Contents
A Bill for an Act to amend the Family Law Act
1975, and for related purposes
The Parliament of Australia enacts:
This Act may be cited as the Family Law Amendment (Joint Residency)
Act 2002.
This Act commences on the day on which it receives the Royal
Assent.
For the avoidance of doubt, section 15AB of the Acts
Interpretation Act 1901 applies to the operation of this Act.
Each Act that is specified in a Schedule to this Act is amended or
repealed as set out in the applicable items in the Schedule concerned, and any
other item in a Schedule to this Act has effect according to its
terms.
1 After Division 10 of
Part VII
Insert:
This Division recognises the fundamental right of every child to
experience the love, guidance and companionship of both parents after their
separation or divorce by assuring a child of frequent and continuing contact
with both parents and to encourage parents to share the rights, duties and
responsibilities of child rearing.
In this Division, joint residence order means an order made
under subsection 64B(3) designating both parents as a child’s residence
providers, and providing that residency of the child is shared in such a way as
to assure the child of frequent and continuing contact with both parents. The
child’s contact with each parent must be as equal as possible. A joint
residence order obligates the parties to exchange information.
(1) In deciding to make a residence order in relation to a child, the
court must regard the best interests of the child as the paramount
consideration, as set out in subsections 68F(2) and 68F(3), in the following
order of preference:
(a) to both parents jointly in a joint residence order;
(b) to either parent;
(c) to any other person deemed by the court to be suitable and able to
provide an appropriate and stable environment.
(2) In considering whether to make an order under paragraph (1)(b),
the court shall have regard, with all the factors set out in subsections 68F(2)
and 68F(3), to which parent is more likely to allow the child frequent and
continuing contact with the non-residence provider parent, and may not determine
a parent as a designated residence provider because of the parent’s gender
or race.
(3) The parent requesting to be the designated residence provider has the
burden of proving that a joint residence order would not be in a child’s
best interest.
(4) The parents may agree to a residence order in favour of one parent.
In making a residence order, the court in its discretion may require the
submission of a plan for the implementation of the parenting order.
(1) There is a rebuttable presumption that joint residence orders are in
the best interests of the child.
(2) The presumption in favour of a joint residence order may be rebutted
by showing that it is not in the best interests of the child, after
consideration of clear and convincing evidence with respect to all the factors
in subsections 68F(2) and 68F(3).
(1) If the court declines to award a joint residence order, the court
shall state in its decision the reasons for denying the award.
(2) An objection by a parent to a joint residence order is not a
sufficient basis for a finding that a joint residence order is not in the best
interests of a child, nor is a finding that the parents are hostile to each
other.
(3) A statement that a joint residence order is not in the best interests
of a child shall not be sufficient to meet the requirements of this
Division.
(1) A joint residence order may be modified or terminated upon the
petition of one or both parents or on the court’s own motion if it is
shown that the best interests of the child require modification or termination
of the order.
(2) In an application for modification or termination, the court shall
consider evidence of substantial or repeated failure of a parent to adhere to
the plan for implementing the joint residence order.
(3) The court shall state in its decision the reason for modification or
determination of the joint residence order if either parent opposes the
modification or termination order.
(4) Any order specifying a parent as the child’s designated
residence provider may be modified at any time to a joint residence
order.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, unless the court orders
otherwise, access to records and information pertaining to a minor child,
including but not limited to medical, dental and school records, shall not be
denied to a parent because the parent is not the designated residence
provider.