Australian Capital Territory Consolidated ActsWhere the Supreme Court is, on application by a doctor, satisfied that—
(a) the person in relation to whom the application is made has a mental illness; and
(b) the person has not given informed consent to the performance of psychiatric surgery and has not refused, either orally or in writing, to consent to such surgery; and
(c) there are grounds for believing that the performance of such surgery is likely to result in substantial benefit to the person; and
(d) all alternative forms of treatment reasonably available have failed, or are likely to fail, to benefit the person;
the court may, by order, consent to the performance of psychiatric surgery on the person.