Australian Capital Territory Bills Explanatory Statements
[Index]
[Search]
[Download]
[Bill]
[Help]
PROJECTS OF TERRITORY IMPORTANCE BILL 2008
2008
THE
LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR THE
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL
TERRITORY
PROJECTS OF TERRITORY
IMPORTANCE BILL 2008
EXPLANATORY
STATEMENT
Authorised by:
Mr Brendan Smyth MLA
PROJECTS OF TERRITORY IMPORTANCE BILL
2008
Overview of Bill
This Bill contains a Preamble, as this is seen as being essential to
establish some of the principles on which this Bill is based. The Bill is
intended to reinforce the overall planning outcomes that are sought for the
Territory. Within this overall planning framework, however, this Bill
recognises that, in exceptional circumstances, the current planning regime for
some projects may have to be modified.
The focus of this Bill is on a very small number of projects that are
considered to be critically important for the future of the Territory, and for
which exceptional circumstances will apply during the planning stages of these
projects. These circumstances relate to the location of a project and will
arise where:
• a site for a project has been
identified;
• considerable work has been undertake to evaluate the
suitability of that site for the project;
• considerable work also has
been completed on evaluating particular factors applying to that site to make it
suitable for the project;
• at a very late stage in the assessment
process, it has been determined that the current site is unsuitable;
and
• an alternative site has been identified and, to ensure that the
momentum of the project is not lost, it will be possible to carry over relevant
parts of the assessment and evaluation processes to the new site.
In
these exceptional circumstances, it will be possible for the ACT Government to
expedite all the assessment and evaluation processes for the second site. In
implementing this approach, there will be a number of checks and balances to
ensure that due process is followed. A particular factor that will be examined
is that any proposal to change a site for a project is genuine and is not an
attempt to circumvent the Territory’s planning processes or any other
provisions.
Notes on key
clauses
Clause 5
This clause defines a ‘project of Territory importance’. This
definition is in terms of a project providing critical infrastructure,
encouraging substantial amounts of capital for investing in new projects and
providing a boost to employment opportunities.
Clause 7
This clause sets out the process that will be followed by the ACT
Government in establishing that a project has the status of being of
‘Territory importance’. In particular, this clause provides the
grounds on which a certificate of importance may be prepared; included in this
process are provisions requiring three independent statutory commissioners to
sign off on the approach being proposed by the Government.
Clause 8
Two Ministers in the ACT Government will be required to prepare a
certificate of importance. The Ministers who will be involved in the
preparation of a certificate will be those with responsibility for economic
development and for planning.
Clause 9
This is the key provision in the Bill, as it sets out the nature of
information required to be incorporated into a certificate of importance. A
certificate is required to set out why the initial site chosen for a project is
unsuitable and why the second site is suitable, what planning and other laws may
need to be modified to expedite the move of the project to the second site and
the details of any other matters that the Ministers consider relevant. It is
not possible to specify these matters because they will be unique to each
proposal; hence, there is recognition that Ministers have the flexibility to
include any further information that is considered necessary.
Clause 11
In view of the objective of this Bill, particularly with respect to the
shortening of the usual planning processes, a safeguard has been incorporated to
provide an indication of acceptance of the change of location of a project of
Territory importance by the community.
This safeguard means that a
certificate of importance has to be approved by at least two thirds of the
Members of the Legislative Assembly. In reality, this means that at least all
major political groups in the Assembly will need to support a certificate of
importance. This measure of support will be a surrogate for and indicate broad
acceptance within the community for the change of location of the
project.
Clause 14
This clause provides that, in the event that a certificate of importance
has been approved, the Minister will advise the Legislative Assembly when the
project has been completed. At that time, the certificate of importance will
expire.
[Index]
[Search]
[Download]
[Bill]
[[Help]]