Australian Capital Territory Bills Explanatory Statements
[Index]
[Search]
[Download]
[Bill]
[Help]
MOTOR SPORT (PUBLIC SAFETY) BILL 2006
2006
LEGISLATIVE
ASSEMBLY FOR THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL
TERRITORY
MOTOR
SPORT (PUBLIC SAFETY) BILL
2006
SUPPLEMENTARY EXPLANATORY
STATEMENT
Circulated by authority of
the
Treasurer
Mr Ted
Quinlan MLA
MOTOR SPORT (PUBLIC SAFETY) BILL
2006
Outline
The Motor Sport (Public Safety) Bill 2005 establishes an
appropriate legislative platform under which motor sport activities contemplated
at dedicated motor sport facilities can be managed.
This Bill is based on existing NSW legislation
that has operated satisfactorily for 20 years and the Bill recognises the lack
of existing regulation with respect to motor sport in the
ACT.
Dedicated motor sport facilities present a
varied array of regulatory issues. These issues are more complex than, say,
events at Exhibition Park in Canberra. Events held at dedicated motor sport
facilities need to be regulated not only to address the essential requirements
for public safety, but also to deal with some unique issues. For instance, motor
sport events are usually part of a national or international competition
framework. They are usually accredited with a governing motor sport organization
and that accreditation requires adherence to national or international
standards. Event Sponsorship and television coverage may hinge on compliance
with these standards. Licensing, insurance, risk and liability management are
likewise linked to the standards, directly or
indirectly.
Accordingly, the key policy
proposal is to manage the risks associated with organised motor sport at a
dedicated motor sport facility. This is achieved through a mechanism designed to
ensure the competence of motor sport operations through:
• Appropriate risk controls at a standard
that protects the public and the interests of sponsors and participants;
• Application of relevant OH&S and
environmental standards; and
• Adequate
insurance arrangements.
These technical
amendments do not detract from the overall purpose of the Bill. However, they
remedy two areas of potential procedural inconsistency.
Clause Notes
1
Proposed amendment to clause 7
(1), Page 4, line 14 —
This amendment recognises that the breadth of discretion
exercisable in clause 7, while necessarily broad, would be better exercised at a
level commensurate with the discretion, rather than by a Chief Executive.
Consequently, the Government has decided to elevate the exercise of power under
the discretions in this section to the responsible
Minister.
2
Proposed amendment to clause 7 (2)
Page 4, line 16 —
This amendment recognises that the breadth of discretion
exercisable in clause 7, while necessarily broad, would be better exercised at a
level commensurate with the discretion, rather than by a Chief Executive.
Consequently, the Government has decided to elevate the exercise of power under
the discretions in this section to the responsible
Minister.
3
Proposed
amendment to clause 8 (1), Page 5, line 2 — this amendment, deleting
references to Chief Executive and inserting the word Minister is consequential
upon amendments to clauses 7 and
9.
4
Proposed
amendment to clause 8 (2), Page 5, line 8 — this amendment, deleting
references to Chief Executive and inserting the word Minister is consequential
upon amendments to clauses 7 and
9.
5
Proposed
amendment to clause 8 (3), Page 5, line 15 — this amendment, deleting
references to Chief Executive and inserting the word Minister is consequential
upon amendments to clauses 7 and
9.
6
Proposed
amendment to clause 9(1) – page 5, line 15 – this amendment
recognises that the breadth of discretion exercisable in clause 9, while
necessarily broad, would be better exercised at a level commensurate with the
discretion, rather than by a Chief Executive. Consequently, the Government has
decided to elevate the exercise of power under the discretions in this section
to the responsible
Minister.
7
Proposed
amendment to clause 9(2) – page 5, line 18 – this amendment
recognises that the breadth of discretion exercisable in clause 9, while
necessarily broad, would be better exercised at a level commensurate with the
discretion, rather than by a Chief Executive. Consequently, the Government has
decided to elevate the exercise of power under the discretions in this section
to the responsible
Minister.
8
Proposed
amendment to clause 9(3) – page 5, line 22 – this amendment
recognises that the breadth of discretion exercisable in clause 9, while
necessarily broad, would be better exercised at a level commensurate with the
discretion, rather than by a Chief Executive. Consequently, the Government has
decided to elevate the exercise of power under the discretions in this section
to the responsible
Minister.
9
Proposed
amendment to clause 9(3) (a) – page 5, line 23 – this amendment
recognises that the breadth of discretion exercisable in clause 9, while
necessarily broad, would be better exercised at a level commensurate with the
discretion, rather than by a Chief Executive. Consequently, the Government has
decided to elevate the exercise of power under the discretions in this section
to the responsible
Minister.
10
Proposed
amendment to clause 9(4) – page 5, line 27 – this amendment
recognises that the breadth of discretion exercisable in clause 9, while
necessarily broad, would be better exercised at a level commensurate with the
discretion, rather than by a Chief Executive. Consequently, the Government has
decided to elevate the exercise of power under the discretions in this section
to the responsible
Minister.
11
Clause
9 (5) (b) – clause 9 (5) (b) – page 6, line 4 –Decision about
motor vehicle racing application the existing sub clause has been
omitted and replaced by a sub clause that puts beyond doubt that the licence may
relate to buildings and facilities without the need for
prescription.
12
Proposed
amendment to clause 10 (3), Page 7, line 5 — this amendment, deleting
references to Chief Executive and inserting the word Minister is consequential
upon amendments to clauses 7 and
9.
13
Proposed
amendment to clause 10 (4), Page 7, line 10 — this amendment, deleting
references to Chief Executive and inserting the word Minister is consequential
upon amendments to clauses 7 and
9.
14
Proposed
amendment to clause 10 (4) (a), Page 7, line 12 — this amendment,
deleting references to Chief Executive and inserting the word Minister is
consequential upon amendments to clauses 7 and
9.
15
Proposed
amendment to clause 10 (4) (b), Page 7, line 15 — this amendment,
deleting references to Chief Executive and inserting the word Minister is
consequential upon amendments to clauses 7 and
9.
16
Proposed
amendment to clause 10 (4) (c), Page 7, line 18 — this amendment,
deleting references to Chief Executive and inserting the word Minister is
consequential upon amendments to clauses 7 and
9.
17
Proposed
amendment to clause 11 (1), Page 7, line 24 — this amendment, deleting
references to Chief Executive and inserting the word Minister is consequential
upon amendments to clauses 7 and
9.
18
Proposed
amendment to clause 11 (3), Page 8, line 3 — this amendment, deleting
references to Chief Executive and inserting the word Minister is consequential
upon amendments to clauses 7 and
9.
19
Proposed
amendment to clause 14 (1) (a), Page 8, line 24 — this amendment,
deleting references to Chief Executive and inserting the word Minister is
consequential upon amendments to clauses 7 and
9.
20
Proposed
amendment to clause 16 (1), Page 9, line 26 — this amendment provides
that it is now the Minister who must provide the licensee written notice in
relation to disciplinary notice (as defined) under the
clause.
21
Proposed
amendment to clause 16 (1) (c), Page 10, line 7 — this amendment,
deleting references to Chief Executive and inserting the word Minister is
consequential upon amendments to clauses 7 and
9.
22
Proposed
amendment to clause 16 (2), Page 10, line 8 — this amendment provides
that it is now the Minister who must consider any response provided in relation
to a disciplinary
notice.
23
Proposed
amendment to clause 16 (3), Page 10, line 11 — this amendment provides
that it is now the Minister and not a Chief Executive who takes disciplinary
action in circumstances where the Minister is
satisfied.
24
Proposed
amendment to clause 16 (4), Page 10, line 14 — this amendment provides
that it is now the Minister who must give a licensee notice of the
Minister’s
decision.
25
Proposed
amendment to clause 17 (1), Page 10, line 23 — this amendment,
deleting references to Chief Executive and inserting the word Minister is
consequential upon amendments to clauses 7 and
9.
26
Proposed
amendment to clause 17 (2), Page 10, line 25 — this amendment,
deleting references to Chief Executive and inserting the word Minister is
consequential upon amendments to clauses 7 and
9.
27
Proposed
amendment to clause 17 (3), Page 10, line 27 — this amendment,
deleting references to Chief Executive and inserting the word Minister is
consequential upon amendments to clauses 7 and
9.
28
Proposed
amendment to clause 17 (3), (a) Page 11, line 1 — this amendment,
deleting references to Chief Executive and inserting the word Minister is
consequential upon amendments to clauses 7 and
9.
29
Proposed
amendment to clause 17 (3), (b) Page 11, line 4 — this amendment,
deleting references to Chief Executive and inserting the word Minister is
consequential upon amendments to clauses 7 and
9.
30
Proposed
amendment to clause 17 (5), (b) Page 11, line 17 — this amendment,
deleting references to Chief Executive and inserting the word Minister is
consequential upon amendments to clauses 7 and
9.
31
Proposed
amendment to clause 18 (2), Page 11, line 22 — this amendment,
deleting references to Chief Executive and inserting the word Minister is
consequential upon amendments to clauses 7 and
9.
32
Proposed
amendment to clause 31, Page 19, line 8 — this amendment requires that
the Minister must consider any relevant information or advice given to the
Minister by an advisory committee (other than in the case of disciplinary
action).
33
Proposed
amendment to clause 33 (2), Page 20, line 14 — this amendment requires
that in a case where the Minister makes a reviewable decision, the Minister must
give written notice to everyone affected by the decision.
[Index]
[Search]
[Download]
[Bill]
[[Help]]