• Specific Year
    Any

Monahan, Geoff; Lliffe, Bronwyne --- "Competency-Based Education And Training For Law Students" [2001] UTSLawRw 14; (2001) 3 University of Technology Sydney Law Review 181

Competency-Based Education And Training For Law Students

Geoff Monahan[1] and Bronwyn Olliffe[2]



Introduction

JUST LIKE many other aspects in our nation’s development, the Australian lawyer evolved more from tradition, reaction and compromise than from a cohesive and logical strategy. It has only been in the last decade that some positive steps have been taken to forge a truly national (and trans-Tasman) legal profession. Despite much discussion, the Australian law student has been educated, trained and regulated, for admission purposes, on a state and territory basis. This is now in the process of changing.

Broadly speaking, this article will examine the movement towards recognised competencies in the training of law students for admission in Australia. It does not examine the recent developments in legal education that have been taking place in the UK and Canada.

The article will also consider the ever-changing partnership between law schools and practical legal training (PLT) providers (including providers of ‘articles’) in producing a pre-admission law graduate. This relationship needs reappraisal given the movement towards the provision of legal skills tuition and assessment in law degrees and the overall cost of education.

Overall, it is worth noting that the judiciary, in particular the private legal profession, has traditionally dictated the state-based pre-admission standards for academic and PLT providers. In NSW, this is clearly demonstrated by the fact that both the judiciary (via the Legal Practitioners Admission Board Diploma of Law course) and the NSW Law Society (via the College of Law Professional Program) are involved in pre-admission academic and vocational legal training. While there is no monopoly in NSW with respect to pre-admission legal education and training, both these organisations conduct courses with significant numbers of students. Consequently, it should come as no surprise that the debate surrounding a national approach to pre-admission standards has focused upon the knowledge, skills and competencies required for legal practice, essentially in the private sector. It should be noted at the outset, however, that pre-admission standards are directed towards general legal practice, rather than specialist legal practice. While legal educational providers have a role in the training of specialist legal practice, it is presumed that this will occur post-admission.

Priestley 11 (Pre-Admission Academic Requirements)

In April 1992, the Law Admissions Consultative Committee (LACC, commonly referred to as the Priestley Committee)[3] made recommendations for uniform admission based upon defined areas of academic legal study. In relation to required length of such study, the Committee recommended that a student undertake a course of study comprising at least three years full time attendance or equivalent part time[4].

The 11 subjects (known as the Priestley 11) suggested by the LACC as a minimum in the academic education of a lawyer are:

  • Criminal Law and Procedure
  • Torts
  • Contracts
  • Property
  • Equity
  • Company Law
  • Administrative Law
  • Federal and State Constitutional Law
  • Civil Procedure
  • Evidence
  • Professional Conduct (including basic Trust Accounting).

An example of the comprehensive description for the subject Professional Conduct is found in Appendix 1. The Committee stated that:

...although the topics below are grouped together for convenience under the headings of particular areas of knowledge, there is no implication that a topic needs to be taught in a subject covering the area of knowledge mentioned in the heading rather than in another suitable subject.

Each jurisdiction subsequently adopted (although not formally in Western Australia) the so-called ‘Priestley 11’ as the academic requirements for admission.

In 1999 all Australia law schools, legal professional bodies and admitting authorities were asked to comment on whether the Priestley 11 needed to be amended. It is our understanding that no substantial suggestions for change were made.

Priestley 12 (Pre-Admission Vocational Requirements)

In February 1994, the LACC released a proposal for uniform practical legal training (PLT) requirements[5], which drew upon the work that had been done by a Working Group established by the Law Council of Australia. Apart from prescribing areas of practice for PLT courses, the Committee also recommended, in lieu of PLT, a minimum requirement of two years’ practical experience of which at least one year must be gained after admission.[6] The Committee provided the following practice topics (commonly referred to as the Priestley 12) for convenience only:

Legal Profession

  • Ethics and Professional

    Responsibility
  • Trust and Office Accounting
  • Skills:
  • Work Management
  • Legal Writing and Drafting
  • Interviewing
  • Negotiation and Dispute

    Resolution
  • Legal Analysis and Research
  • Advocacy
  • Areas
  • Litigation
  • Property Practice
  • Wills and Estate Management
  • Commercial and Corporate Practice

An example of the content details for the subject areas of Legal Profession (Ethics and Professional Responsibility/Trust and Office Accounting) is found in Appendix 2.

In July 1994, the Law Council of Australia finally released its blueprint for uniform standards of admission and of PLT.[7] The proposal endorsed the practice topic areas suggested by its Working Group which had been adopted earlier by the LACC.[8] Notwithstanding the recommendations made by the LACC and the release of the Law Council blueprint, the admitting authorities did not adopt the suggested uniform PLT requirements.

In late 1996, the Law Council of Australia established a National Advisory Committee for Legal Education and Professional Admission to revisit the issue of uniform admission requirements, and in particular, uniform vocational standards. The National Advisory Committee included representatives from the Council of Australian Law Deans and the legal profession and a representative from the PLT providers and Australian Law Students Association (ALSA). While the National Advisory Committee met on several occasions throughout 1997, it is our understanding that no firm decisions were reached.

APLEC 9 (Pre-Admission Vocational Requirements)

In July 1997, the Australasian Professional Legal Education Council[9] (APLEC) released a draft of its own recommended standards for pre-admission vocational training[10] for submission, to both the LACC and the National Advisory Committee. The APLEC recommendations were prefaced by the fact that admission provides a licence to general practice, and as such:

...the vocational component must, as far as possible, expose aspiring practitioners to practice in the common major areas of practice.[11]

The so-called APLEC 9 was modelled with close reference to the competency standards, which apply in relation to the training of accountants in Australia and New Zealand (commonly known as the Birkett Standards).[12] As with the Birkett Standards, the APLEC 9:

...is philosophically oriented towards generalised training for a generalist licence, recognising that non-specialist practising certificates are currently issued in all Australian states and territories, with attendant implications for community expectations of threshold professional competence in a range of practice areas.[13]

In addition to the prescribed fields of practice, APLEC also recommended professional values and skills fields as follows:[14]

  • Fields
  • Ethics and Professional Values
  • Fields
  • Professional Skills
  • Work and Management Skills
  • Fields
  • Criminal Law Practice
  • Family Law Practice
  • Civil Litigation
  • Business Law and Practice
  • Wills and Estate Practice
  • Property Law Practice

An example of the content details for the Value Fields (Ethics and Professional Values) is found in Appendix 3.

While there was broad consensus as to the basic legal skills and competencies required for legal practice, the debate proceeded upon a presumption that quality pre-admission legal training could best be undertaken by prescribing a minimum period of legal education.

The pre-admission/PLT requirements were somewhat indicative of a quantitative approach to the production of a competent law graduate.[15] The Executive Summary states that:

[p]rogram length is construed by the proposal in terms of an optimal nine hundred (900) hour curriculum of structured training activities or, in the case of articles of clerkship, a single professional year of supervised on the job training, being approximately eighteen hundred (1800) hours of work placement...A structured 900 hour curriculum ought ideally to include a minimum 90 hours work place experience and a minimum of 450 hours of programmed learning activities. A predominantly unstructured 1800 hour work placement in clerkship ought ideally to include a minimum 90 hours of structured training...These periodic parameters are based on the concept of the ‘professional year’ (a full time academic year or a full time working year) and reflect the literature, experience and international standards in practical legal training in many comparable jurisdictions.[16]

The APLEC 9 standards were a descriptive model only and were designed to foster minimum national competencies. Individual state-based providers would continue to determine the emphasis of the nine fields within their overall curriculum. Given the membership of APLEC it was not surprising that the proposal contemplated the integration of PLT within the Bachelor of Laws. The APLEC 9 standards were prefaced upon the view that PLT is:

more effective when it is intensive and occurs just prior to the trainee entering professional practice or is integrated with professional or clinical experience.[17]

The proposal stipulated that full integration of PLT within the LLB is only desirable where:

  • the combined program is of sufficient duration to allow it to fulfil the objectives of both the academic and vocational components;
  • students complete relevant academic parts of the program before engaging in the practical vocationally specific parts of the program;
  • staff providing vocational training have the experience and qualifications recommended for staff in institutional vocational training courses; and
  • both the academic and vocational aspects of the program are adequately funded and resourced.[18]

In relation to the issue of cross-institutional credit and advanced standing, the APLEC 9 standards commented that it was:

consistent with the move to a national legal profession, that where a person completes part of her or his vocational component training in one State or Territory, that she or he should be able to gain credit in the second State or Territory for any training already completed.[19]

While this recommendation is logical, it opens up the issue of recognising the prior learning of legal skills within the LLB.

The NSW admission requirements simply state that a person is qualified for admission if he or she has completed ‘practical training’.[20] In December 1997 the NSW Legal Practitioners Admission Board (LPAB) adopted a proposal (agreed to by the six then current NSW PLT providers) based upon the APLEC prescription.[21]

It is worth noting that currently in NSW, it is possible to obtain a complete exemption from the PLT requirement if an applicant demonstrates suitable experience in private practice. This is soon to change. Exemptions for those applicants who have had experience in a legal environment but who have not completed a formal PLT course and who have not been admitted in any jurisdiction will cease from 30 June 2003. The LPAB, as part of a review of certain policies and practices determined this in July 2001.[22] The LPAB was concerned with the quality of the training that applicants for exemptions were receiving on the job. The LPAB held the view that the quality control provided in a PLT course is superior to that provided by the training arrangements operating in most solicitors’ offices. The LPAB was confident that now there are a number of institutions offering practical legal training, there are sufficient places available for all applicants.

In summary the APLEC 9 specified in broad terms the skills, values and practical knowledge that each student ought to be able to demonstrate upon completion of a course of practical legal training.

In February 1999 the LACC invited views from the Australian Law Deans and PLT providers on:

  • Any alterations or additions to the enclosed description of the ‘Priestley 12’ which you think are now required.
  • Likely trends in the content, delivery and requirements for PLT which you think may influence the development of PLT.
  • Any significant constraints which you think may influence that development and your views about how they might be resolved.
  • Any other information which you think might help the committee in its deliberations.[23]

The Hon. Mr Justice L.J. Priestley summarised the responses received by the committee.

  • There was an overwhelming view that the present prescriptions were too broad and ill defined to help PLT courses or work place providers of PLT to design satisfactory programs, devise assessment modes or form judgments about whether students possessed appropriate competence and skills. There was widespread support for the APLEC approach of trying to develop statements of competence which students should be required to achieve...
  • Several respondents made particular suggestions to include training in areas which reflect recent developments in the practising environment. These included such matters as legal technology and information systems, the estimation of costs, negotiation of fees with clients and subsequent obligations to report progress, risk management and its attendant ethical issues...
  • There was surprising unanimity in the perception of trends. Any future arrangements for delivering PLT will have to provide opportunity for full, part-time and supplementary PLT courses. They will need to allow for distance and electronic education and for accrediting workplace providers to deliver some, if not all, components...
  • Together with competition policy, the cost of PLT courses and ‘user-pays’ requirements were seen as the most significant constraints to devising and delivering appropriate PLT.[24]

LACC and APLEC Competency Statements For Entry Level Lawyers

It was a logical step for the LACC and APLEC to join forces to review pre-admission vocational requirements. It was also logical to move towards ‘competencies’ as a further development of the APLEC Standards. As has been noted:

competence is now not only a central feature of education and training reforms in many countries—it is also central to government-initiated wider industrial reform agendas.[25]

The major parts of the Competency Statements (or ‘Competency Standards’)[26] were drafted at an intensive weekend workshop held at the UTS at the end of January 2000. There were representatives from APLEC and a number of participants nominated on behalf of LACC by the Law Council of Australia. Gordon Joughin, an education consultant who had been engaged by APLEC to assist with developing competencies for the APLEC areas of practice, facilitated the workshop.

The Competency Standards developed provide a thorough foundation for minimum standards in curricula. They are based on what is usually done in the workplace and the standard performance that is normally required.[27] As such they provide a comprehensive framework for the technical knowledge and aptitudes within a program of PLT.

To successfully complete a PLT program, a student will need to provide evidence that he/she has achieved the requisite competence in the defined Skills, Practice Areas and Values.

The skills described in Lawyer’s Skills are those which have long been considered essential to the lawyer’s craft: oral communication, legal interviewing, advocacy, negotiation, dispute resolution, letter writing and legal drafting. Also included in the Skills section are problem solving, work management and business skills, and trust and office accounting.

Ethics and professional responsibility are contained in the Values section.

It is in the Practice Areas where the greatest divergence from the APLEC standards can be found. For the first time there is the possibility for a PLT student to choose optional studies. Civil litigation practice, commercial and corporate practice and property law practice are each compulsory. Students must also undertake one of the following: administrative law practice, criminal law practice or family law practice. In addition they must complete one practice area from consumer law practice, employment and industrial relations practice, planning and environmental law practice, or wills and estates practice.

A PLT student will be covering a wide range of Practice Areas. This raises the question of whether such an emphasis is going to prepare the lawyers of the 21st century in the best way available. Changes in the law are occurring so rapidly, should admitting authorities and practical legal training providers be requiring such mastery of practice areas? Professor David Weisbrot highlights this issue with the title of his recent newspaper article, ‘Lawyers need to know more than just the law’.[28] Skills and Values have certainly been included in the Competency Standards but to be able to cover the compulsory Practice Areas will absorb the greatest amount of time which a PLT course has available. We can certainly attest to the fact that law students are currently in such a hurry to complete their PLT (and thus seek admission) that perhaps the time they spend undertaking PLT should be more focused on developing the high order professional skills (oral and written communication skills, negotiation and dispute resolution, listening, fact finding, problem solving, project management and teamwork skills, and sensitivity to the client’s interests and experience) identified by Professor Weisbrot.[29]

The potential for options being offered by the PLT providers will possibly give the larger providers a market advantage over smaller providers. Students, once aware of these options, presumably will make their choice of provider based on the options available. Staff will need to develop expertise in one or more of these areas. It may also be possible for students to obtain an exemption from one of these options if a subject previously studied as part of their law qualification meets the requirements of the option.

The option of previous study of a subject is particularly relevant now that a course of Legal Ethics must be a subject of the law qualification of those students wanting to be admitted in NSW. It appears that many of the Legal Ethics courses are covering areas which traditionally have been encompassed by the term Professional Responsibility and therefore have been more likely to be studied during practical legal training. The overlap between the current Priestley academic and vocational prescriptions for legal ethics and professional responsibility is obvious.

The membership of APLEC is now quite diverse. It includes universities, law societies and institutions such as Sydney’s College of Law and Melbourne’s Leo Cussens Institute. Each of these stakeholders provide very different PLT courses. In order to achieve consensus on the competencies they have been expressed in general terms. The competencies do not prescribe the means by which the standards within them should be achieved or the overall framework in which they operate in each educational institution.

Wade Proposal (Post-Admission Vocational Requirements)

In her March 1998 Discussion Paper to the Standing Committee of Attorneys-General (known as SCAG), the then Victorian Attorney-General, Jan Wade, recommended the adoption of post-admission PLT (the Wade Proposal).[30] The Law Institute of Victoria had suggested a similar view in the early 1990s. Under this proposal, law graduates would be eligible to be admitted to legal practice immediately following graduation and would be required to undertake further structured training post-admission within a stipulated period before being eligible to seek an unrestricted practising certificate. The Wade Proposal did not progress past the ‘proposal’ stage.

Recognition of LLB Skills for Admission Purposes?

The introduction of stand-alone legal skills subjects, or their integration within compulsory or elective subjects, has become more entrenched with the increase in the number of new law schools. Generally speaking, the newer law schools have adopted legal skills as part of their overall curricula. This is logical given that the private law firms and the various governments remain the significant source of employment for law graduates. More recently, some of the traditional law schools have adopted, or are examining the adoption of, legal skills programs. Apart from the obvious educational benefits of adopting legal skills programs, there is growing pressure from both students and employers for this additional form of pre-admission training. This may be particularly so in states where students undertake articles or clerkship in lieu of institutional PLT.

It will be interesting to see whether law schools will implement the recommendations of the Australian Law Reform Commission in its recent report, ‘Managing Justice: a review of the federal civil justice system’. The terms of reference of the inquiry asked the Commission to consider ‘the significance of legal education and professional training to the legal process’.[31] The Commission found that education, training and accountability ‘play a critical role in shaping the legal culture...achieving systemic reform and maintaining high standards of performance rely on the development of a healthy professional culture—one that values lifelong learning and takes ethical concerns seriously.’[32] Recommendation 2 provides:

In addition to the study of core areas of substantive law, university legal education in Australia should involve the development of high level professional skills and a deep appreciation of ethical standards and professional responsibility.[33]

Legal skills may be conveniently categorised into the following nine areas:[34]

  • Legal Research and Method
    • traditional library and computerised legal research techniques
    • legal method including case analysis, statutory interpretation and problem solving
  • Written Communication
    • drafting techniques including plain language
    • legal writing including traditional and practical legal advice, contentious and non-contentious documentation and correspondence
  • Oral Communication
    • counselling (client interviewing and advising)
    • public speaking and presentations
  • Advocacy
    • mooting
    • defended advocacy (in accordance with the rules of evidence)
    • mentions, directions hearings, interlocutory applications, bail applications and pleas in mitigation
  • Dispute Resolution
    • early dispute resolution processes including mediation and arbitration
    • negotiation skills
  • Management
    • professional awareness including personal work, office and client management
    • basic business practices
    • risk management
  • Property and Commercial Transactions[35]
    • conveyancing, leasing and mortgage transactions
    • business, corporate and estate transactions
  • Litigation[36]
    • generic civil and criminal litigation process
    • specialist jurisdictions
  • Clinical Legal Education
    • practical experience and work-based learning

If law schools adopt or integrate all of the above skills in a proper way, it is arguable that reduces or eliminates the need for compulsory skills training in either articles of clerkship or PLT. It could also be argued that if this did occur the PLT providers could offer skills at a higher level than is currently envisaged they should provide. The ‘one stop shop’ approach to pre-admission training (i.e. integrating skills/PLT within the LLB) certainly has some have appeal to students in terms of reducing both the length and arguably the cost of their legal education. It may also enable the newer law schools to consolidate and expand their market share into the next century. This, in turn, may place some pressure upon the established law schools.

What Next?

The movement to recognised standards dominated the debate on pre-admission legal education and training in the 1990s. The question of content, and prescriptive competencies has almost been resolved in the view of LACC and APLEC. As at September 2001 there remains an outstanding issue as to whether there should be any ‘time provision’ in the Competency Standards. It is questionable whether a time provision has any place in Competency Standards. The joint approach adopted by the LACC and APLEC has meant that many of the stakeholders in practical legal training have been involved in determining the Competencies and will endeavour to ensure that their various courses meet them.

The Council of Australians Law Deans (CALD) has now supported the general thrust of the Competencies. There was some reservation that the depth of knowledge required by the Competencies is set at a level which is too high for an entry level lawyer.[37] The attainment of the depth of knowledge required is made more difficult by the lack of correlation between the required areas of practice and the core areas of substantive law taught at law schools.

The Competency standards have been submitted for consideration to all Law Admitting Authorities. The LACC has recommended to the Law Admitting Authorities that they adopt the Statements of Competency as setting out the requirements for Practical Legal Training.[38] We understand that the NSW Legal Practitioners Admission Board adopted the Statements of Competency at its meeting in August 2001. It is to be hoped that the Admitting Authorities in other jurisdictions will soon follow so that it can truly be said that there is a national admission standard in Australia.

Law students, legal education providers, the profession and the public should welcome the move towards recognised standards. Recognised standards will allow the existing LLB/PLT courses to remain vocationally relevant and will provide aspiring PLT providers with a blueprint for the adoption of a pre-admission legal training strategy.

Whatever the end result, the overlap issue needs to be addressed so that the pre- education and training of law students is a cohesive and logical one. In other words, the mix (and/or integration) of traditional legal scholarship, legal skills and legal transactions needs to be clearly recognised.

In terms of the overall cost of legal education, it is somewhat ironic that while most of the established PLT providers have moved to a full fee-paying environment, some newer providers have embraced PLT within their LLB studies and within a HECS environment. If law schools continue to adopt or integrate only part of the skills and knowledge required for admission to practice, then it is obvious that some logistical problems will arise for PLT providers. Will these providers give, as the APLEC proposal contemplates, cross-credit or advanced standing for skills training undertaken as part of the LLB? This already occurs to some extent in NSW.[39] The law schools may be wise to consider whether their legal skills integration or electives are suitable for PLT accreditation. The PLT providers may have to consider offering basic courses whereby students would be offered bridging studies for skills training not undertaken as part of the LLB. The admitting authorities may need to be understanding of the needs of providers and students by not requiring further training to be undertaken if suitable education is successfully undertaken as part of an LLB or equivalent program. Moreover, we can envisage a situation where a potential PLT student may claim to have met the requisite competencies prior to the commencement of the training program. This will no doubt cause an interesting issue for the PLT providers.[40]

Appendix 1: Priestley 11

  • PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

    (INCLUDING BASIC TRUST ACCOUNTING)
  • and personal conduct in respect of practitioners’ duty:
  • to the law;
  • to the Courts;
  • to clients, including a basic knowledge of the principles of trust accounting; &
  • to fellow practitioners.
  • topics of such breadth and depth as to satisfy the following guidelines:
the topics should include knowledge of the various pertinent rules concerning a practitioner’s duty to the law, the Courts, clients and fellow practitioners and a basic knowledge of the principles of trust accounting.

The aims of the trust account segment of Professional Conduct are:

  • to impart an understanding of the legal requirements on solicitors for dealing with trust property;
  • to help students obtain a level of competence in, and understanding of, the recording requirements for trust accounts and other trust dealings.

Areas covered should include:

  • Provisions of the relevant State or Territory legislation governing the legal profession which relate to the handling of trust money and other trust property;
  • Legislative provisions which enable the proper identification of trust moneys;
  • The ramifications of breach of trust;
  • An overview of trust accounting systems;
  • Methods of maintaining trust account records. This includes class exercises in recording of receipts, payments and direct payments of trust moneys and of investments (including mortgage investments) by solicitors on behalf of their clients;
  • A detailed study of any relevant legislation, regulations or rules relating to trust accounting.

Appendix 2: Priestley 12

Legal Profession:

1. ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY

  • the rules of professional conduct, including retainers and liens, trust accounts and professional misconduct;
  • the main requirements of the Act and Rules governing the conduct of the legal profession in the relevant jurisdiction;
  • duties to the court, client, profession and society; and
  • conflicts of interest.
  • topics of such breadth and depth as to satisfy the following guideline:

students or articled clerks should be able to describe and apply legislative and other sources of rules and procedures associated with professional conduct, identify situations of conflict and other circumstances which attract ethical responsibilities, identify professionally appropriate behaviours and responses, and reflect maturely on their role and work as lawyers.

2. TRUST AND OFFICE ACCOUNTING

  • the general principles of relevant bookkeeping;
  • the relevant rules governing the keeping of trust accounts
  • memoranda of costs, and obligations to clients.
  • topics of such breadth and depth as to satisfy the following guideline:

students or articled clerks should have a general understanding of bookkeeping principles and practices, be able to maintain trust accounts in accordance with all statutory and other requirements, and be able to describe and apply all statutory and other requirements in regard to office accounting.

Appendix 3: APLEC Standards

Values:

1. ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL VALUES

  • Appropriate professional behaviour in all dealings with clients, courts, the public and other lawyers.
  • 1. To identify, analyse, apply and where necessary resolve conflict between the privileges and obligations incident to each of the relationships set out below as they arise in specific professional contexts.
  • The relationship with the client:
  • advancement and protection of clients’ interests;
  • competence and diligence;
  • confidentiality and client privilege;
  • reliability and integrity in handling clients’ moneys.
  • The relationship with the Court
  • frankness;
  • responsible use of privilege;
  • the integrity of evidence;
  • avoidance of misleading conduct.
  • The relationship with the public
  • honesty and fairness;
  • the maintenance of the law;
  • responsiveness to disciplinary systems including knowledge of enquiries;
  • uphold and advance the image of the profession.
  • In relationships with other lawyers
  • honesty and frankness;
  • courtesy;
  • adherence to undertakings.
  • To observe the ethical standards, Rules of Professional Conduct and other regulatory standards of the legal profession.
  • To demonstrate a commitment to maintain and further develop professional knowledge and skills to guarantee competence in client representation, through continuing professional education.

Appendix 4:LACC and APLEC Competency Statements for Entry Level Lawyers

CIVIL LITIGATION

Descriptor: An entry level lawyer should be able to conduct civil litigation in first instance matters in one or more State or Territory courts of general jurisdiction, in a timely and cost-effective manner.

Element Performance criteria The lawyer has competently:

1.Assessing the merits of a case and identifying the dispute resolution alternatives
  • assessed the strengths and weaknesses of both the claimant’s and opponent’s cases.
  • identified the facts and evidence required to support the client’s case.
  • identified all means of resolving the case, having regard to the client’s circumstances.
  • identified and complied with the relevant limitation period.
2.Initiating and responding to claims
  • identified an appropriate claim or defence.
  • identified a court of appropriate jurisdiction.
  • identified the elements of the claim or defence, according to law.
  • followed procedures for bringing the claim or making the defence in accordance with the court’s rules and in a timely manner.
  • drafted all necessary documents in accordance with those procedures.
3.Taking and responding to interlocutory proceedings
  • identified any need for interlocutory steps, according to the court’s rules.
  • followed procedures for taking those steps in accordance with the court’s rules and in a timely manner.
  • drafted all necessary documents in accordance with those procedures and rules.
4. Gathering and presenting evidence
  • identified issues likely to arise at the hearing.
  • identified evidence needed to prove any facts in dispute, according to the rules of evidence.
  • gathered the necessary evidence.
  • presented that evidence according to law and the court’s rules.
5. Negotiating settlements
  • conducted settlement negotiations in accordance with specified principles.
  • identified any revenue and statutory refund implications.
  • properly documented any settlement reached.
6. Taking action to enforce orders and settlement agreements
  • identified procedures for enforcing the order or settlement according to law and the court’s rules.
  • Followed those procedures in a timely manner.

Explanatory Note

This competency standard applies to first instance civil litigation in a local lower and a local higher court of an Australian State or Territory, having general jurisdiction, and in the Federal Court.

Means by which a dispute might be resolved include, but are not limited to:

  • negotiation;
  • mediation;
  • arbitration;
  • litigation;
  • expert appraisal.

Means by which evidence might be gathered include:

  • statements from
  • notices to admit;
  • witness;
  • discovery;
  • subpoena;
  • expert reports.

Means by which evidence might be presented include:

  • orally on oath;
  • affidavits;
  • video or telephone link.

Means of enforcement include:

  • execution process including attachment of debts;
  • taxation or assessment of costs;
  • oral examination.

Commercial and Corporate Practice

Descriptor: An entry level lawyer should be able to conduct standard commercial transactions such as the sale or purchase of a small business. The lawyer should be able to set up standard business structures using entities such as companies, trusts and partnerships; provide basic advice on finance and securities and the obligations of companies and their officers; and appreciate the type of advice needed to assess the revenue implications of standard commercial transactions.

Element Performance criteria The lawyer has competently:

1. commercial transactions
  • identified the nature of the transaction properly.
  • undertaken sufficient searches and inquiries to investigate any relevant issues of title to real or personal property.
  • drafted documents, had them executed, and (if necessary) certified, stamped andregistered them, according to law and good practice.
  • obtained or given any necessary consents to, or notifications of, the transaction required by law.
2. Setting up commercial structures
  • selected a structure that will achieve the client’s objectives.
  • drafted all documents required to set up the structure (including establishing any discrete entities that will form part of the structure) had them executed and (if necessary) certified, stamped and registered them, according to law and good practice.
  • informed the client of any continuing obligations in relation to the structure, and where the structure involves a corporation, the continuing obligations of the company and its officers.
3.Dealing with loans and securities
  • identified the various appropriate types of financial arrangements and securities available to the borrower and lender.
  • informed the borrower and lender of their immediate, continuing, and potential liabilities under any proposed financing and security arrangements.
  • drafted loan or security documents which reflect the agreement between lender and borrower.
  • had the loan or security documents executed and (if necessary) stamped and registered them according to law.
4.Advising on revenue law and practice
  • identified the possible general revenue implications of the client’s proposed commercial venture or arrangement.
  • referred the client to experts for more comprehensive or detailed advice, where appropriate.

Explanatory Note

This competency standard applies to commercial and corporate practice. It includes:

  • some common commercial transactions, such as the sale or purchase of a small business;
  • setting up standard business structures and entities, including companies;
  • advising on the legal obligations of corporations and their officers;
  • advising on due diligence investigations;
  • identifying in a general way the possible revenue implications of standard commercial dealings and structures;
  • drafting standard loan agreements and securities.
  • structures include:
  • trusts;
  • private companies;
  • partnerships;
  • joint ventures;
  • franchise arrangements.
  • include:
  • bills of sale;
  • chattel leases;
  • loans agreements;
  • guarantees, including guarantees from spouses.
  • implications include:
  • stamp duties;
  • income tax;
  • capital gains tax;
  • GST.

ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY

Descriptor: An entry level lawyer should act ethically and demonstrate professional responsibility and professional courtesy in all dealings with clients, the courts, the community and other lawyers.

Element Performance criteria The lawyer has competently;

1.Acting ethically
  • identified any relevant ethical dimension of a particular situation.
  • taken action which complies with professional ethical standards in that situation.
2.Discharging the legal duties and obligations of legal practitioners
  • identified any duty or obligation imposed on the lawyer by law in a particular situation.
  • discharged that duty or obligation according to law and good practice.
3.Complying with professional conduct rules
  • identified any applicable rules of professional conduct.
  • taken action which complies with those rules.
4.Complying with fiduciary duties
  • recognised and complied with any fiduciary duty, according to law and good practice.
5.Avoiding conflicts of interest
  • identified any potential or actual conflict, as soon as is reasonable in the circumstances.
  • taken effective action to avoid a potential conflict or, where a conflict has already arisen, dealt with it in accordance with law and good practice.
  • taken appropriate action, where applicable,to prevent such a conflict arising in the future.
6.Acting courteously
  • demonstrated professional courtesy in all dealings with others.
7.Complying with rules relating to the charging of fees
  • identified any rules applying to charging professional fees.
  • complied with those rules, where they are relevant.
  • maintained records and accounts in accordance with law and good practice.
8.
Reflecting on
wider issues
  • reflected on that lawyer’s professional performance in particular situations.
  • brought to the attention of an employer or professional association any matters that require consideration or clarification.

Explanatory Note

This competency standard applies to:

  • ethics;
  • statutes and general law relating to the duties and obligations of legal practitioners;
  • written and unwritten rules of professional conduct;
  • written and unwritten rules of professional courtesy.

The duties and obligations imposed by law on legal practitioners include duties:

  • of confidentiality;
  • to maintain competence;
  • to act honestly;
  • not to mislead the court;
  • not to pervert the course of justice or the due administration of justice.

Conflicts of interest commonly arise between:

  • joint venture partners;
  • directors and shareholders of a company;
  • trustees and beneficiaries in a family trust;
  • parties to any transaction where their interests potentially differ.

LAWYER’S SKILLS

Descriptor: An entry level lawyer should be able to demonstrate oral communication skills, legal interviewing skills, advocacy skills, negotiation and dispute resolution skills, and letter writing and legal drafting skills.

Element Performance criteria The lawyer has competently:

1.Communicating effectively
  • identified the purpose of a proposed communication, the most effective way of making it, an appropriate communication strategy, and the content of the proposed communication.
  • presented thoughts, advice, and submissions in a logical, clear, succinct and persuasive manner, having regard to the circumstances and the person or forum to whom the communication is made.
  • identified and appropriately dealt with verbal, non-verbal and cross-cultural aspects of the proposed communication.
  • taken any follow-up action in accordance with good practice.
2.Interviewing clients
  • prepared for the interview properly, having regard to relevant information
  • available before the interview and the circumstances.
  • conducted the interview using communication techniques appropriate to both the client and the context.
  • ensured that the client and lawyer have both obtained all the information which they wanted from the interview in a timely, effective and efficient way, having regard to the circumstances.
  • ensured that the lawyer and client left the interview with a common understanding of the lawyer’s instructions (if any) and any future action that the lawyer or client is to take.
  • made a record of the interview that satisfies the requirements of law and good practice.
  • taken any follow-up action in a timely manner.
3.Drafting other documents
  • identified the need for, and purpose, of the document.
  • devised an effective form and structure for the document having regard to the parties, the circumstances, good practice, principles of writing simple, straightforward English and the relevant law.
  • drafted the document effectively having regard to the parties, the circumstances, good practice, principles of writing simple, straightforward English, and the relevant law.
  • considered whether the document should be settled by counsel.
  • taken every action required to make the document effective and enforceable in a timely manner and according to law (such as execution by the parties, stamping, delivery and registration).
4.Negotiating settlements and agreements
  • prepared the client’s case properly havingregard to the circumstances and good practice.
  • identified the strategy and tactics to be used in negotiations and discussed them with and obtained approval from the client.
  • carried out the negotiations effectively having regard to the strategy and tactics adopted, the circumstances of the case and good practice.
  • documented any resolution as required by law or good practice and explained it to theclient in a way the client can easily understand.
5.Facilitating early resolution of disputes
  • identified the advantages and disadvantages of available dispute resolution options and explained them to the client.
  • performed in the lawyer’s role in the dispute resolution process effectively, having regard to the circumstances.
  • documented any resolution as required by law or good practice and explained it to theclient in a way the client can easily understand.
6.Representing a client in court
  • observed the etiquette and procedures of the forum.
  • organised and presented in an effective, strategic way: factual material—relevant decided cases; and—analysis of relevant legal issues.
  • presented and tested evidence in accordance with the law and good practice.
  • made submissions effectively and coherently in accordance with law and good practice.

Explanatory Note

This competency standard applies to ‘composite’ skills which require a lawyer to synthesise several generic skills and apply them in a specific legal context. Lawyers must be able to exercise such skills effectively.

Representation refers to advocacy on behalf of a client in a court, tribunal or other forum. It includes:

  • an aspect of preliminary or pre-trial civil or criminal proceedings;
  • an aspect of first instance trial advocacy in a simple matter;
  • leading evidence-in-chief and making submissions.

Representation includes cross-examination and re-examination.

Dispute resolution options include:

  • negotiation;
  • mediation;
  • arbitration;
  • litigation;
  • expert appraisal.

PROBLEM SOLVING

Descriptor: An entry level lawyer should be able to investigate and analyse facts and law, provide legal advice and solve legal problems.

Element Performance criteria The lawyer has competently:

1.Analysing facts and identifying issues
  • identified and collected all relevant facts as far as is practicable.
  • analysed the facts to identify any existing or potential legal issues.
  • distinguished facts that might be used to prove a claim from other facts, if the matter so requires.
2.Analysing law
  • identified any questions of law raised by the matter.
  • researched those questions of law properly, having regard to the circumstances.
  • identified and interpreted any relevant statutory provisions and applied them
  • appropriately to the facts.
3.Providing legal advice
  • applied the law to the facts of the matter in an appropriate and defensible way.
  • given the client advice in a way which the client can easily understand.
  • kept up with any developments that might affect the accuracy of previous advice and told the client about the effect of those developments.
4.Generating solutions and strategies
  • identified the problem and the client’s goals as fully as is practicable.
  • investigated the facts and legal issues as fully as is practicable.
  • developed creative options and strategies to meet the client’s objectives.
  • identified the advantages and disadvantages of pursuing each option or strategy.
  • assisted the client to choose between those options in a way consistent with good practice.
  • developed a plan to implement the client’s preferred option.
  • acted to resolve the problem in accordance with the client’s instructions and the lawyer’s plan of action.
  • remained open to new information and ideas and updated advice to the client where necessary.

Explanatory Note

This competency standard applies to:

  • analysing facts;
  • analysing legal and practical issues;
  • analysing law;
  • interpreting statutes;
  • giving advice;
  • solving problems in the context of legal practice.

Analysing law includes researching legal issues using;

  • law libraries;
  • on-line searches;
  • electronic data bases;
  • legal citators and digests.

Analysing law also includes applying principles of precedent and statutory interpretation.

PROPERTY PRACTICE

Descriptor: An entry level lawyer should be able to convey, lease and mortgage real property. The lawyer should also be able to provide general advice instandard matters arising under local government,planning, environmental or other legislation regulating land use in that State or Territory.

Element Performance criteria The lawyer has competently:

1.Transferring title
  • identified the nature of the interest being dealt with properly, having regard to the applicable title system.
  • prepared an appropriate contract of sale or other type of agreement and had it executed according to law and good practice.
  • undertaken sufficient searches and inquiries to investigate title, any issues about land use and responsibility for outgoings.
  • drafted an appropriate instrument of transfer or conveyance and had it executed and (if necessary) stamped and registered, according to law.
  • obtained or given any consents to, or notifications of, the transfer or conveyance according to law.
2.Creating leases
  • made and obtained all searches and consents required by law and good practice.
  • drafted a lease in a form allowed by law, reflecting the agreement between lessor and lessee and protecting their respective interests.
  • arranged for the lease to be executed and (if necessary) stamped and registered, according to law.
3.Creating and releasing securities
  • made and obtained all searches and consents required by law and good practice.
  • drafted an effective instrument to create or release the security, reflecting the agreement between the grantor and grantee and protecting their respective interests.
  • arranged for the instrument to be executed and (if necessary) stamped and registered, as required by law.
4.Advising on land use
  • identified any legislative scheme regulating the relevant use.
  • advised the client generally about processes to be followed to obtain permission for, or to object to the use, as the case requires.
5.Advising on revenue implications
  • identified the revenue implications of anytransaction and advised the client accordingly.

Explanatory Note

This competency standard applies to dealings with interests in real and leasehold property, land use and securities. It must include:

  • contracts for sale of land including special conditions;
  • transferring title (or equivalent interest under the scheme of land title that exists in the particular State or Territory);
  • creating standard commercial leases;
  • creating standard residential tenancies or leases;
  • creating and releasing of mortgages;
  • some aspect of land use.

The competency standard includes dealings under the main system of land title operating in the jurisdiction in which the lawyer practises. For example, in Queensland it would include dealings in respect of freehold title under the Land Title Act 1994.

Aspects of land use might involve issues arising out of:

  • town planning schemes;
  • local government by-laws;
  • environment and heritage legislation.
  • competency standard is limited to:
  • any one system of land title operating in a State or Territory;
  • transactions which an entry level lawyer would be expected

    to perform.

TRUST AND OFFICE ACCOUNTING

Descriptor: An entry level lawyer should have sufficient knowledge, skills and values to maintain trust and general account records according to law and good practice, to the extent usually permitted and expected of an employed solicitor.

Element Performance criteria The lawyer has competently:

1.Receiving money
  • dealt with money received from or on behalf of a client, as required by law and good practice.
  • where the law and good practice requires money to be deposited in a trust account or general account, recorded the deposit as required by law and good practice.
  • issued any receipt required by law and good practice.
2.Making outlays
  • made any outlay from the correct account, according to law and good practice.
  • recorded the outlay as required by law and good practice.
3.Rendering costs
  • calculated the costs in accordance with law, good practice and any agreement between the lawyer and client.
  • added to the bill all outlays made by the firm for which the client is responsible.
  • accounted to the client for any money received from the client on account of costs and outlays, as required by law and good practice.
  • drafted the bill and delivered it in accordance with law and good practice.
4.Maintaining Trust account
  • maintained any trust account in accordance with specific statutory requirements, including any requirements relating to common fund deposits and auditing.

Explanatory Note

This competency standard applies to trust and general accounting . It requires a general knowledge of bookkeeping and knowledge of the solicitors’ trust account law and practice and auditing requirements in the lawyer’s jurisdiction.

WILLS AND ESTATES

Descriptor: An entry level lawyer who practises in wills and estates should be able to draft wills, administer deceased estates and take action to solve problems about wills and estates.

Element Performance criteria The lawyer has competently:

1.Drafting wills
  • advised the client of issues, options, and potential problems that might arise in respect of the client’s testamentary intentions.
  • obtained instructions reflecting the client’s informed and independent wishes, which can be effectively implemented.
  • drafted a will reflecting the client’s instructions.
  • identified any issues of testamentary capacity and resolved them in accordance with law and good practice.
  • ensured that the client executed the will in accordance with law.
  • given any necessary follow up advice to the client.
2.Administering deceased estates
  • obtained a grant of probate or letters of administration where required.
  • identified the debts and assets of the estate.
  • gathered in the estate or transferred or transmitted assets directly to beneficiaries, as appropriate, having regard to the law, good practice, and the circumstances.
  • discharged the estate’s debts, distributed specific gifts and the residue and ensured that the executors have been released of their obligations in a timely fashion.
3.Taking action to resolve wills and estates problems
  • identified the nature of the problem properly, having regard to the law of the jurisdiction.
  • identified he client’s options for dealing with the problem, having regard to the law of the particular jurisdiction and the client’s circumstances.
  • explained the options to the client in a way the client can easily understand.
  • taken action to resolve the problem in accordance with the client’s instructions.

Explanatory Note

This competency standard applies to wills and deceased estate practice. It must include:

  • drawing standard wills;
  • obtaining an uncontested grant of letters of administration on an intestacy or probate where a will exists;
  • administering a standard deceased estate;
  • helping solve at least one common type of will or estate problem.
  • and estates problems include:
  • testamentary capacity;
  • construction;
  • validity of gifts;
  • assets outside the jurisdiction;
  • revenue issues;
  • family provision;
  • mutual wills;
  • trusts.
  • up advice required may include:
  • the effects of marriage on a will;
  • the effects of divorce on a will;
  • storage options;
  • revocation;
  • modification;
  • availability of associated documents such as enduring powers of attorney.

WORK MANAGEMENT AND BUSINESS SKILLS

Descriptor: An entry level lawyer should be able to manage workload, work habits, and work practices in a way that ensures that clients’ matters are dealt with in a timely and cost effective manner.

Element Performance criteria The lawyer has competently:

1.Managing personal time
  • used a diary or other system to record time limits or deadlines and to assist in planning
  • work.
  • identified conflicting priorities as they arise and managed the conflict effectively.
  • used available time effectively, to the benefit of the lawyer’s clients and employer.
2.Managing risk
  • conducted each matter in a way that minimises any risk to the client, lawyer or firm arising from missed deadlines, negligence or failure to comply with the requirements of the law, a court or other body.
  • recognised the limits of the lawyer’s expertise and experience and referred the client or matter to other lawyers, counsel or other professionals, as the circumstances require.
3.Managing files
  • used a file management system to ensure that work priorities are identified and managed; clients’ documents are stored in an orderly and secure manner; and to alert the lawyer to any need to follow up a matter or give it other attention.
  • rendered timely bills, in accordance with law and any agreement between the lawyer and client, which set out the basis for calculating the lawyer’s fees.
  • accurately recorded all communications and attendances, with details of dates and times.
4.Keeping client informed
  • communicated with the client during the course of the matter as frequently as circumstances and good practice require.
  • confirmed oral communications in writing when requested by the client or required by good practice.
  • dealt with the client’s requests for information promptly.
  • informed the client fully of all important developments in the matter, in a way which the client can easily understand.
5.Working cooperatively
  • worked with support staff, colleagues, consultants and counsel in a professional and cost effective manner.

Explanatory Note

This competency standard applies to the exercise of good work habits in a legal practice to ensure that:

  • clients do not suffer loss or damage from a lawyer missing deadlines or neglecting matters;
  • clients are kept informed regularly and fully of the progress of their matters;
  • clients’ matters are dealt with in a cost-effective manner.

[1]BA (Macq), LLB (Syd), LLM (NSW), Grad Cert Higher Ed (UTS). Associate Professor in Law, UTS.

[2]BA (Hons)LLB (Syd), LLM (UTS), Senior Lecturer in Law, UTS.

[3]The Committee takes its name from its chairman, the Hon. Justice L.J. Priestley, a judge of the NSW Court of Appeal.

[4]See for example, s 95(1)Legal Practitioners Transitional Admission Rules 1994 (NSW).

[5]Consultative Committee of State and Territorial Law Admitting Authorities, Report on Uniform Practical Legal Training Requirements, February 1994.

[6]Ibid p.1.

[7]Law Council of Australia, Blueprint for the Structure of the Legal Profession: A National Market for Legal Services, July 1994.

[8]n 3, p.3.

[9]In 1998 the APLEC members were: Institute of Professional Legal Studies, Auckland, Wellington, Christchurch, Hamilton and Dunedin; The Legal Workshop, Faculty of Law, Australian National University; Leo Cussen Institute, Melbourne; Legal Practice Course, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology; The College of Law, Sydney; Faculty of Law, University of Newcastle; Faculty of Law, University of Technology, Sydney; Practical Legal Training Unit, Faculty of Law , University of Wollongong; Professional Legal Training Institute, Faculty of Law, Bond University; Centre for Legal Studies, University of Tasmania; School of Law and Legal Practice, University of South Australia; Legal Practice Course, Law Society of South Australia; Articles Training Course, Perth.

[10]Australian Professional Legal Education Council, Standards for the Vocational Preparation of Australian Legal Practitioners, APLEC, Sydney, 1997.

[11] Ibid p.14.

[12]Birkett, W.P., The Demand for, and the Supply of, Education for Professional Accountants, Task Force for Accounting Education in Australia, UNSW, 1990.

[13]Australian Professional Legal Education Council., Standards for the Vocational Preparation of Australian Legal Practitioners, APLEC, Sydney, 1997, p.13.

[14]Ibid p.15.

[15]All Australian States and Territories set qualifying times for pre-admission vocational training. In 1998 the situation was as follows: Queensland—2 years of articles or 31 weeks of PLT, p.QUT (28 weeks course based, four weeks work based); ACT—22 weeks of PLT, p.ANU (18 weeks course based, four weeks work based); NSW—College of Law 15 weeks of PLT plus 15 weeks work experience plus 75 hours continuing training; UTS 18 weeks of PLT plus 16 weeks of work experience; Bond, 15 weeks of PLT plus 24 weeks work experience plus 60 hours continuing training; University of Newcastle Professional Program

integrated LLB/vocational course; University of Wollongong PLT course 20 weeks integrated course based/work based with entry requirements; SA—18 weeks of PLT, p.Uni. of SA (ten weeks course based , six weeks work experience, two week exam period) plus a post-admission training conducted by the SA Law Society; Tas—26 weeks of PLT, p.the Centre for Legal Studies/Uni. of Tas. plus one year of articles; Vic—31 weeks of PLT, p.the Leo Cussen Institute or one year of articles; WA—one year of articles and a 25 day training program.; NT—one year of articles. Such a presumption is also true of tertiary academic courses, which qualify a person for admission as a legal practitioner in NSW. Pt 11, division 1, r 94(1)of the Legal Practitioners Transitional Admission Rules 1994, states, amongst other things, ‘A person is qualified for admission if he or she has completed: a tertiary academic course in Australia whether or not leading to a degree in law, which includes the equivalent of, p.least 3 years full-time study of law and which is recognised in, p.least one Australian jurisdiction as a sufficient academic qualification for admission by the Supreme

Court of that jurisdiction as a barrister, solicitor, barrister and solicitor, or legal practitioner...’

[16]n 11, p.14.

[17]Ibid p.23.

[18]Ibid.

[19]Ibid p.26.

[20]Ibid r 94(1)(c).

[21]In particular course length, course mix and subject areas.

[22]LPAB, Review of Certain Policies and Practices, July 2001, p.1.

[23]Letter to Professor Barker (Dean, UTS Faculty of Law) from the Hon. Mr Justice L.J. Priestley, 22 February 1999.

[24]Letter to Professor Barker (Dean, UTS Faculty of Law) from the Hon. Mr Justice L.J. Priestley, 23 April 1999.

[25]Chappell, Gonczi and Hager, ‘Competency-based education’ in Foley. G. (ed.), Understanding Adult Education and Training, 2nd edn, Allen & Unwin, Sydney, 1999, p.191.

[26]The presciption for the compulsory subjects are found in Appendix 4.

[27]The competencies were developed with reference to Heywood, Gonczi and Hager, A Guide to Development of Competency Standards for Professions, Department of Employment Education and Training, 1992.

[28]Weisbrot, D., ‘Lawyers need to know more than just the law’, Australian Financial Review, 31 August 2001, p.9.

[29]Ibid.

[30]Attorney-General for Victoria, Legal Profession Admission Requirements: Discussion Paper, Melbourne, 18 March 1998, para 36.

[31]Australian Law Reform Commission, Managing Justice: a review of the federal civil justice system, AGPS, 2000. The Report reflects the law as, p.31 December 1999. Chapter 2, ‘Education , training and accountability’, p.1.

[32]Ibid

[33]Ibid, p.22.

[34]So-called transactional subjects are included in the list and the assumption made that the Priestley 11 subject Professional Conduct would be taught to include accounting transactions and procedures. In addition, ethical considerations, where relevant, would be included in the both the skills and transactional subjects.

[35]Given the substance of these transactional areas, they are often taught as separate subjects in PLT courses.

[36]This overlaps with the Priestley 11 subject Civil Procedure.

[37]Letter from Professor Paul Fairall on behalf of CALD to the Hon. Mr Justice L.J. Priestley, 12 June 2001.

[38]Letter to the Hon. Mr Justice Gleeson AC from the Hon. Mr Justice Priestley, dated 25 January 2001.

[39]Interestingly, in 1998 the NSW Legal Practitioners Admission Board wrote to the heads of the PLT courses advising them that they could grant appropriate exemptions for previous study undertaken, p.an undergraduate level. Since 1999, the NSW LPAB has required students to undertake an academic course in legal ethics, in addition to PLT, unless cross-accredited for both purposes (academic and PLT).

[40]At UTS r 2.28 provides that to be eligible for an award of the university a student must complete, p.least two-thirds of the time requirement of a course of three years or less full time duration.

Download

No downloadable files available