Campbell, Colin D --- "A Hard Case Making Bad Law: Purvis v New South Wales and the Role of the Comparator Under the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth)" [2007] FedLawRw 4; (2007) 35(1) Federal Law Review 111

^[∗] BA LLM (Melbourne), LLM PhD (Cambridge), Faculty of Law, Monash University. I would like to thank my colleague Dale Smith for his assistance in the writing of this piece. The usual disclaimer applies.

^[1] [2003] HCA 62; (2003) 217 CLR 92.

^[2] Ibid 161.

^[3] Ibid.

^[4] Ibid.

^[5] Ibid.

^[6] Ibid 175.

^[7] Ibid 100–1.

^[8] Ibid 100.

^[9] Ibid.

^[10] Ibid 101.

^[11] Ibid.

^[12] Ibid 131 (emphasis in original).

^[13] Ibid 134. See also 137.

^[14] [2004] FCA 485 (Unreported, Heerey J, 23 April 2004).

^[15] Ibid [86].

^[16] Ibid.

^[17] Ibid.

^[18] Ibid.

^[19] Ibid.

^[20] Purvis [2003] HCA 62; (2003) 217 CLR 92, 117 (emphasis in original).

^[21] World Health Organization, International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps: A Manual of Classification Relating to the Consequences of Disease (1980).

^[22] Ibid 118 (McHugh and Kirby JJ).

^[23] Ibid.

^[24] Ibid 119.

^[25] Ibid.

^[26] Ibid.

^[27] Ibid 175.

^[28] Ibid 156–7.

^[29] Ibid.

^[30] Ibid 160.

^[31] Ibid 160–1.

^[32] Ibid 101.

^[33] Ibid 134.

^[34] Disability Discrimination Act 1993 (Cth) s 3.

^[35] Purvis [2003] HCA 62; (2003) 217 CLR 92, 135.

^[36] See, eg, Power v Aboriginal Hostels Ltd [2003] FCA 1475; (2003) 133 FCR 254, 259 (Selway J).

^[37] It is almost certain that the word 'with' here is a drafting error, and should be 'without'. See Fetherston v Peninsula Health [2004] FCA 485 (Unreported, Heerey J, 23 April 2004) [90].

^[38] Purvis [2003] HCA 62; (2003) 217 CLR 92, 159.

^[39] [2004] FCA 485 (Unreported, Heerey J, 23 April 2004). See the text accompanying n 14–19.

^[40] [2005] FMCA 2 (Unreported, Driver FM, 7 February 2005).

^[41] Ibid [38].

^[42] Ibid [145].

^[43] Ibid.

^[44] See the text accompanying n 7–11.

^[45] See above Part I(A)(1) entitled 'Internal tension'.

^[46] See above Part I(A)(4)–(5).

^[47] Purvis [2003] HCA 62; (2003) 217 CLR 92, 175.

^[48] Ibid 161.

^[49] Ibid 162.

^[50] Ibid.

^[51] Ibid 161 (Gummow, Hayne and Heydon JJ).

^[52] Those areas in which illegal discrimination may occur, but in which the unjustifiable hardship defence was not available when Purvis was decided, are listed by McHugh and Kirby JJ in Purvis [2003] HCA 62; (2003) 217 CLR 92, 123.

^[53] Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) s 11(a).

^[54] Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) s 11(b).

^[55] Purvis [2003] HCA 62; (2003) 217 CLR 92, 123 (emphasis in original).

^[56] Ibid.

^[57] See Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) s 22(4).

^[58] Purvis [2003] HCA 62; (2003) 217 CLR 92, 129.

^[59] Ibid.

^[60] See Purvis v New South Wales (Department of Education and Training) (2002) 117 FCR 237, 247–8 (Spender, Gyles and Conti JJ).

^[61] The observation of McHugh and Kirby JJ in Purvis that 'construing the Act narrowly because of the consequences in a particular case may lead to injustices in other cases perceived by the judicial mind as more deserving' alludes to the same point: see Purvis [2003] HCA 62; (2003) 217 CLR 92, 103–4.

^[62] Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) s 3(a).

^[63] As Edwards observes, the majority does not advert to the role played in its interpretation of s 5(1) by the unavailability of the unjustifiable hardship defence in the context of the facts of Purvis: Samantha Edwards, 'Purvis in the High Court Behaviour, Disability and the Meaning of Direct Discrimination' [2004] SydLawRw 30; (2004) 26 Sydney Law Review 639, 650.

^[64] Purvis [2003] HCA 62; (2003) 217 CLR 92, 158 (Gummow, Hayne and Heydon JJ).

^[65] Ibid (emphasis in original).

^[66] Ibid (footnote omitted), quoting Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (UK) s 5(1) (emphasis added by the High Court of Australia).

^[67] Ibid (emphasis in original).

^[68] Ibid.

^[69] See the observations to the contrary in Clark v TDG Ltd (t/a Novacold Ltd) [1999] EWCA Civ 1091; [1999] 2 All ER 977, 987 (Mummery LJ).

^[70] Purvis [2003] HCA 62; (2003) 217 CLR 92, 162 (Gummow, Hayne and Heydon JJ).

^[71] Ibid.

^[72] See text accompanying n 14–19 above.

^[73] Purvis [2003] HCA 62; (2003) 217 CLR 92, 158 (Gummow, Hayne and Heydon JJ).

^[74] Ibid 162 (Gummow, Hayne and Heydon JJ).

^[75] Ibid.

^[76] But not always a foregone conclusion — see above Part I(A)(3) entitled 'The modest role accorded to s 5(1)'.

^[77] Cf the assertion of Gleeson CJ to the contrary: Purvis [2003] HCA 62; (2003) 217 CLR 92, 101.

^[78] Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) s 10(b).

^[79] Purvis [2003] HCA 62; (2003) 217 CLR 92, 99.

^[80] Ibid 101.

^[81] Ibid 100.

^[82] Ibid 99.

^[83] Ibid.

^[84] Ibid 98.

^[85] Ibid.

^[86] Ibid.

^[87] Convention on the Rights of the Child, opened for signature 20 November 1989, 1577 UNTS 3 (entered into force 2 September 1990).

^[88] Purvis [2003] HCA 62; (2003) 217 CLR 92, 98.

^[89] Ibid.