![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Queensland Body Corporate and Community Management Commissioner - Adjudicators Orders |
Last Updated: 17 September 2009
REFERENCE: 0625-2009
ORDER OF AN ADJUDICATOR
MADE UNDER PART 9 OF CHAPTER 6
BODY CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT ACT 1997
|
Number of Scheme:
|
8525
|
|
Name of Scheme:
|
Picton
|
|
Address of Scheme:
|
120 Whitmore Street TARINGA QLD 4068
|
TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to an application made under the abovementioned Act by Craig and Leanne Morton, the owner of Lot 1; Donna Martin, the owner of Lot 2; and Knud Melchiorsen and Wen Huang, the owner of Lot 4
STATEMENT OF ADJUDICATOR’S REASONS FOR DECISION - REF 0625-2009
“Picton” CTS 8525
The scheme
“Picton” community titles scheme 8525
consists of 5 lots and is subject to the Body Corporate and Community
Management Act 1997 (Act) and the Body Corporate and Community
Management (Standard Module) Regulation 1997 (Standard Module).
Application
This application made on 8 July 2009 by the owners of
Lots 1, 2 and 4 (Applicants) against the Body Corporate seeks an outcome that
Strata Vision Group Pty Ltd (Strata Vision) be appointed as administrator to
convene an annual general meeting for the financial
year ending 31 July
2009.
In making the application, the Applicants submit all the business on the agenda of the Annual General Meeting dated 23 October 2008 was not transacted and minutes of the meeting have not been drafted. They say no levies have been issued and no financial records have been maintained since the date of the meeting. The Applicants want an administrator appointed to assist the Body Corporate call and hold an annual general meeting for this year.
The Applicants provided a copy of a proposed Administration Agreement between the Body Corporate and Strata Vision.
On 30 July 2009, Tracey Ralph, the owner of Lot 3 consented to the appointment of Strata Vision.
Jurisdiction
Section 276(1) of the Act provides that an
adjudicator may make an order to resolve a dispute, in the context of a
community titles scheme, about a claimed
or anticipated contravention of the
Act; or the exercise of rights or powers, or the performance of duties,
under the Act. An order may require a person to act, or prohibit a
person from acting, in a way stated in the order (s 276(2), Act). An
adjudicator's order may contain ancillary and consequential provisions the
adjudicator considers necessary or appropriate (s
284(1), Act).
Investigation
An adjudicator may require a party to the application
who may be able to help resolve the issues raised by the application to give
information to the adjudicator (s 271(1), Act).
For the reason the abovementioned proposed Administration Agreement seemed to relate to the engagement of Strata Vision as body corporate manager, I requested Strata Vision provide consent limited to being appointed to convening an annual general meeting. On 29 July 2009, Anne Chambers of Strata Vision confirmed her willingness to being appointed as administrator.
On 30 July 2009, I provided a copy of the application to the committee and to Anne Waldby, the owner of Lot 5, with an invitation to respond to the matters raised in the application. On 31 July, Anne Waldby consented to the appointment of Strata Vision.
Determination
In making the application, the Applicants stated that
a general meeting has not been held this year. The Applicants request authority
to now hold an annual general meeting.
A body corporate must hold and conduct meetings as prescribed under the regulation module applying to the scheme, which in this case is the Standard Module (s 104, Act). An annual general meeting must be held within 3 months after the end of each of the scheme’s financial years (s 66, Standard Module). An annual general meeting is integral to the management of a body corporate as consideration is given to: reviewing the past financial year’s income and expenditure, considering future spending needs through the adoption of an administration fund budget and a sinking fund budget; fixing contributions to be paid by lot owners; determining whether the next financial year’s accounts should be audited; reviewing insurance; and electing a committee.
The Applicants submit that the end of financial year is 31 July. It is apparent business from the Annual General Meeting dated 23 October 2008 was not completed and that the Body Corporate has not been properly administered since this meeting. It is also evident that the nominations for the election of the committee have not been invited in accordance with section 16 of the Standard Module; at least 3 weeks before, but not earlier than 6 weeks before the end of the financial year. All owners agree to the proposition that Strata Vision be appointed to call and hold the annual general meeting that must be held by 31 October 2009. If an order is not made authorising a person to be appointed as administrator to call and hold an annual general meeting, the convening and conduct of the meeting by the Body Corporate could be invalidated. This would leave the legal status of the Body Corporate in doubt, as well as the validity of any decisions purportedly passed at an annual general meeting. This would clearly not be in the interests of owners.
In the circumstances, it is appropriate to order that an administrator be appointed in the terms sought. I am satisfied that owners have agreed to the nomination of Strata Vision as administrator. If an adjudicator appoints an administrator to perform obligations of the body corporate, the committee or a member of the committee, anything done by the administrator under the authority given under the order is taken to be done by the body corporate, committee or committee member (s 278, Act). If an order is made appointing an administrator, the administrator has the powers given to the administrator under the order (s 301(2), Act).
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2009/297.html