![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Queensland Body Corporate and Community Management Commissioner - Adjudicators Orders |
Last Updated: 27 February 2007
REFERENCE: 0075-2007
ORDER OF AN ADJUDICATOR
MADE UNDER
PART 9 OF CHAPTER 6
BODY CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT ACT
1997
|
Number of Scheme:
|
31278
|
|
Name of Scheme:
|
The Sands Port Douglas
|
|
Address of Scheme:
|
Barrier Street PORT DOUGLAS QLD 4877
|
TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to an application made under the abovementioned Act by
the body corporate for The Sands Port Douglas
|
I hereby authorise the committee of the body corporate for The Sands
Port Douglas to spend up to $9,900 for removal of one specimen of Melaleuca
leucadendra
located on the walkway between lot 1 SP155111 and Lot 2
SP155111.
|
STATEMENT OF ADJUDICATOR’S REASONS FOR DECISION - REF
0075-2007
"The Sands Port Douglas" CTS 31278
Application
The Sands Port Douglas Community Titles Scheme (The Sands) is a 26 lot
scheme under the Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997
(Act) and the Act’s Standard Module Regulation
(Standard Module).
This application is by the body corporate
for The Sands seeking authorisation for emergency expenditure.
Submissions
Submissions by the committee on behalf of the body corporate were to the
effect that the body corporate has had an independent report
carried out by a
tree specialist to state that the Melaleuca leucadendra tree is dangerous and
requires removal. It is submitted
that this tree should be removed as soon as
possible and orders are sought to permit the committee to spend above the
relevant limit
for committee spending. Two quotations are attached and it is
stated that payment for the tree removal will be made from the sinking
fund.
All owners have been given a short period to provide any objections
to the proposed orders sought. No objections have been received.
Decision
Applicable law
The legislation includes provisions that limit committee spending on a project but allows an adjudicator to authorise additional spending if satisfied that the spending is required to meet an emergency (Standard Module, 103).
Removal of tree
I understand that the committee spending limit at The Sands is $3,250. The
committee has provided two quotations for removal of the
tree in question. The
first quotation for removal of the tree is $9,570. The second quotation is for
$9,900.
I have been provided with a copy of a report from Port Douglas
Professional Tree Services indicating that the tree is affected by
bracket
fungus, the live crown ratio is 35%, and the structural integrity of the
branch/stem has been severely compromised. The committee have
also provided a
permit to remove the tree issued by the Douglas Shire Council.
In the
circumstances, it is appropriate to authorise emergency spending for removal of
the tree as I am satisfied that the tree poses
a risk of injury or damage to
persons or property. I note that both quotations obtained by the committee are
roughly comparable.
Therefore, I will authorise emergency expenditure of up to
the amount of the higher quotation to allow the committee to choose their
preferred contractor based on availability or other considerations.
Order
For these reasons, I make the order above.
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2007/81.html