![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Queensland Body Corporate and Community Management Commissioner - Adjudicators Orders |
Last Updated: 8 August 2007
REFERENCE: 0575-2007
ORDER OF AN ADJUDICATOR
MADE UNDER
PART 9 OF CHAPTER 6
BODY CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT ACT
1997
|
Number of Scheme:
|
23367
|
|
Name of Scheme:
|
La Belle Pacifique
|
|
Address of Scheme:
|
Angler Street, Noosa Heads Queensland
|
TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to an application made under the abovementioned Act by the body corporate for La Belle Pacifique community titles scheme 23367
|
I hereby order that for the purposes of the Body Corporate and
Community Management Act 1997 and pursuant to section 283 of the Act, the
next financial year end date of the body corporate for La Belle Pacifique
community titles scheme 23367 shall be
29 February 2008.
I further order that thereafter each successive financial year for the body corporate shall commence on 1 March and end on the last day of February. |
STATEMENT OF ADJUDICATOR’S REASONS FOR DECISION - REF
0575-2007
"La Belle Pacifique" CTS 23367
An order of an adjudicator has been sought under the Body Corporate and
Community Management Act 1997 (the Act) to change the end of financial year
for the scheme to 28 February or 29 February in a leap year.
Section
276(1)(b) of the Act provides that an adjudicator may make an order that is just
and equitable in the circumstances, to resolve
a dispute, in the context of a
community titles scheme, about the exercise of rights or powers, or the
performance of duties under
this Act of the community management statement. An
adjudicator’s order may contain ancillary or consequential provisions the
adjudicator considers necessary or appropriate (section 284(1), Act). Section
283 of the Act specifically provides that With the consent of the body
corporate, the order of the adjudicator may include a change of the body
corporate’s financial
year and of the dates when later financial years
begin.
The application was initially made by the committee on the
basis of a purported committee resolution in June 2007 under section 35 of the
Body Corporate and Community Management (Standard Module) Regulation
1997. The applicant did not provide any material indicating that the body
corporate had approved the change in financial year in general
meeting. A
resolution in general meeting is necessary before an application for an order to
change a body corporate’s financial
year can be made.
Given that
the application was incorrectly made, Noosa District Body Corporate Management
(the body corporate manager) was requested
to seek written consents from the lot
owners to the outcome being sought. On 26 July 2007, the body corporate manager
provided copies
of signed voting papers that proposed That the Body Corporate
approve the lodgement of an application for a declaratory order for the purpose
of changing the current year
end date from 9th of March each year to
the 28th of February (or 29th of February on a leap year)
each year. The manager also provided a copy of the body corporate roll. It
is apparent that the owner (or their nominee) of each lot has
signed the voting
paper distributed by the manager agreeing to the change in the financial
year.
In the circumstances, I am satisfied that the body corporate
members consent to the proposed change of the body corporate’s
financial
year and that it is appropriate to make an order to change the financial year
end date to the end of February.
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2007/453.html