![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Queensland Body Corporate and Community Management Commissioner - Adjudicators Orders |
Last Updated: 19 December 2006
REFERENCE: 0336-2006
ORDER OF AN ADJUDICATOR
MADE UNDER
PART 9 OF CHAPTER 6
BODY CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT ACT
1997
|
Number of Scheme:
|
13555
|
|
Name of Scheme:
|
Weimar
|
|
Address of Scheme:
|
59 Errol Avenue, PARADISE POINT QLD 4216
|
TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to an application made under the abovementioned Act by
Jenny Ralda Farrell and Philip John Tunbridge, the co-owners of lot 3
|
I hereby order that -
I further order that within seven (7) days of the date of this order the administrator must give a copy of this order to each person whose name appears on the roll as the owner of a lot in the scheme ("lot owners"). I further order that -
I further order that the administrator shall pay the body corporate insurance policy due on 4 July 2006 from body corporate funds. |
STATEMENT OF ADJUDICATOR’S REASONS FOR DECISION - REF
0336-2006
"Weimar" CTS 13555
APPLICATION
The applicants have sought an order of an
adjudicator under the Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997
(the Act) that a meeting be called to place the body corporate on a proper legal
footing.
Weimar is a community titles scheme comprising 4 lots. The
scheme was established upon registration of the building units plan (now
described as a building format plan) on 22 October 1974. The scheme is
regulated by the Body Corporate and Community Management (Standard Module)
Regulation 1997 (Standard Module).
The applicants stated in the
supporting grounds that no annual general meeting was held last year, and the
previous body corporate
secretary has resigned. They further stated that no
management, secretarial or maintenance issues have been attended to in the
period
of their ownership (since August 2004) and they are concerned because the
scheme’s insurance is due to be paid on 4 July 2006.
The applicants
subsequently advised that they were willing to be appointed as administrators
for the purpose of calling the meeting,
at which it is intended, amongst other
things, to appoint a body corporate
manager.
JURISDICTION
Section 276(1) of the Act
provides that an adjudicator may make an order that is just and equitable in the
circumstances (including a declaratory
order) to resolve a dispute, in the
context of a community titles scheme, about-
(a) a claimed or anticipated contravention of the Act or the community management statement; or
(b) the exercise of rights or powers, or the performance of duties, under the Act or the community management statement; or
(c) a claimed or anticipated contractual matter about-
(i) the engagement of a person as a body corporate manager or service contractor for a community titles scheme; or
(ii) the authorisation of a person as a letting agent for a community titles
scheme.
An order may require a person to act, or prohibit a person from
acting, in a way stated in the order (Act s276(2)). An
adjudicator's order may contain ancillary and consequential provisions the
adjudicator considers necessary or appropriate (Act
s284(1)).
Specifically, without limiting the power of an adjudicator
to make an order under section 276(1), an adjudicator may order the body
corporate to call a general meeting of its members to deal with stated business
or to change the
date of an annual general meeting (Act Schedule 5 section 6).
Alternatively, the adjudicator may order the appointment of an administrator,
and authorise the administrator to perform obligations of the body corporate,
its committee, or a member of its committee under this
Act or the community
management statement (Act Schedule 5 section 23).
The administrator has
the powers given to the administrator under the order (Act s301(2)).
Section 301(4) provides that the order may –
a) withdraw all or particular stated powers from the body corporate (and any delegate of the body corporate) or from stated officers of the body corporate until the administrator has taken the necessary action to secure compliance with the obligations; and b) require officers or delegates of the body corporate to take stated action to help perform the work the administrator is required to perform; and c) fix the administrator’s remuneration.
An order appointing an administrator may be the only order the adjudicator makes for an application (Act s276(4)(a)). An adjudicator’s order may contain ancillary or consequential provisions the adjudicator considers necessary or appropriate (Act s284(1)).
Section 60 of the Standard Module provides that the original owner
must call and hold the first annual general meeting of the body corporate
within
one month after the first of the following to happen -
(a) more than 50% of the lots included in the scheme are no longer in the ownership of the original owner;
(b) 6 months elapse after the establishment of the scheme.
Moreover the agenda for the meeting must include the items set out in
section 62(3) of the Standard Module. If the original owner does not
call and hold the first annual general meeting as required by the section,
the
order of an adjudicator under the dispute resolution provisions may include an
order appointing a person to call the first annual
general meeting within a
stated time (section
62(4)).
DETERMINATION
Submissions were sought from all
owners. The owners of two of the three remaining lots stated that they were in
agreement with the
application.
In the circumstances, I am satisfied that
an order should be made in terms authorised by section 62(4) of the
Standard Module. The appointment is necessary to authorise a person to call and
hold an annual general meeting of the scheme,
and allow it to thereafter proceed
on a proper legal basis. I have, however, only appointed one of the applicants
as administrator,
as I consider it unnecessary to have a dual
appointment.
I have also authorised the administrator to pay the
scheme’s insurance from body corporate funds.
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2006/329.html