![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Queensland Body Corporate and Community Management Commissioner - Adjudicators Orders |
Last Updated: 19 July 2006
REFERENCE: 0125-2006
ORDER OF AN ADJUDICATOR
MADE UNDER
PART 9 OF CHAPTER 6
BODY CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT ACT
1997
|
Number of Scheme:
|
20082
|
|
Name of Scheme:
|
Mooretellar Place
|
|
Address of Scheme:
|
3-5 Moore Street MILTON QLD 4064
|
TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to an application made under the abovementioned Act by
Leslie Kostellar, the owner of lot 1 and Bobbie Kootsookos, the
representative of Petalex Pty Ltd, the owner of lot 3
• the consideration of motions included on the agenda of the meeting; and
I further order that -
further order that –
• to further delegate any of those powers to another person; or
|
STATEMENT OF ADJUDICATOR’S REASONS FOR DECISION - REF
0125-2006
"Mooretellar Place" CTS 20082
The applicant, Leslie Kostellar, the owner of lot 1 and Bobbie Kootsookos,
the representative of Petalex Pty Ltd, the owner of lot
3, have sought the
following order of an adjudicator under the Body Corporate and Community
Management Act 1997 (the Act) quote:
We seek an order appointing Mr Leslie Kostellar as Secretary with a brief to convene a general meeting and compile adequate body coporate records. ...
Section 276(1) of the Act provides that an
adjudicator may make an order that is just and equitable in the circumstances
(including a declaratory
order) to resolve a dispute, in the context of a
community titles scheme, about-
(a) a claimed or anticipated contravention of the Act or the community management statement; or
(b) the exercise of rights or powers, or the performance of duties, under the Act or the community management statement; or
(c) a claimed or anticipated contractual matter about-
(i) the engagement of a person as a body corporate manager or service contractor for a community titles scheme; or
(ii) the authorisation of a person as a letting agent for a community titles
scheme.
An order may require a person to act, or prohibit a person from
acting, in a way stated in the order (section 276(2)). An adjudicator's
order may contain ancillary and consequential provisions the adjudicator
considers necessary or appropriate (section 284(1)).
Specifically,
without limiting the power of an adjudicator to make an order under section
276(1), an adjudicator may make an order
appointing an administrator, and
authorising the administrator to perform obligations of the body corporate, its
committee, or a
member of the committee under the Act or community management
statement.
Section 301 of the Act deals specifically with the appointment
of an administrator, quote:
301 Appointment of
administrator
(1) This section applies if an order is made under
this chapter appointing an administrator.
(2) The administrator has
the powers given to the administrator under the order.
(3) Without
limiting subsection (2), the power may include power to levy a special
contribution against the owners of lots included in
a community titles scheme to
meet the cost of complying with obligations to which the order relates and the
costs of the administration.
(4) The order may--
(a) withdraw all
or particular stated powers from the body corporate, a body corporate manager to
whom a power has been given under
section 119 or 120, or stated officers of the
body corporate
until the administrator has taken the necessary action to
secure compliance with the obligations; and
(b) require officers of the body
corporate or a body corporate manager mentioned in paragraph (a) to take stated
action to help perform
the work the administrator is required to perform;
and
(c) fix the administrator’s remuneration.
(5) The
administrator’s remuneration is to be paid out of the funds of the body
corporate.
(6) This section does not apply to the enforcement of a
monetary obligation of the body corporate arising under another Act unless it
is
an enforceable money order.
In the grounds to the application, the
applicants state that:
Mooretellar Place is under standard format plan for which no general meetings minutes, body corporate roll or other essential documentation can presently be located, indeed, it seems doubtful that any general meeting was ever held or any recorded ever existed.
We seek an order appointing Mr Leslie Kostellar as Secretary with a brief to convene a general meeting and compile adequate body coporate records. The general meeting agenda should include motions for:
Adoption of budget and levies
Consideration of motions for/against audit
Consideration of insurance cover
Election of Office bearers
The applicants are the owners of two of the three lots in the scheme. The third owner, Judith Anne Morgan (nee Topping) and Adam Douglas Morgan (Morgan) were not parties to the application. In the circumstances, this office sought submission from Morgan as to their attitude to the application. Morgan has responded by way of submission. Relevantly that submission states:
During this phone call Ms Kootsookos raised the matter of "formalising" the body corporate ... . I asked that paperwork and proposed cost of this action be forwarded to me in order for me to make a decision as I was not prepared to verbally agree to this course of action without seeing supporting documentation.
We have not received any written correspondence directly from Ms Kootsookos, Mr Kostellar or agents acting on their behalf in relation to above matters. The letter dated 8 March 2006 received from the Office of the Commissioner for Body Corporate and Community Management was the first time that we have been notified that any matters concerning the "Mooretellar Place" body corporate are in dispute.
It is clear from the application, and confirmed
by the submission of Morgan, that this body corporate is presently not complying
with
its statutory obligations, including the election of a committee, the
holding of regular meetings, the establishment of administrative
and sinking
funds, and a host of other statutory requirements for the effective operation of
the body corporate.
Whilst the applicants might only want to form a body
corporate for the purposes of sale of one of their lots, and Morgan might
consider
it’s a choice whether or not to operate as a body corporate, the
fact is that the law requires owners in community title schemes
to operate as a
body corporate in compliance with the relevant legislation.
Given this,
I am satisfied that the order sought is required in order that this body
corporate might constitute itself on a proper
legal footing. On the issues of
concern raised by Morgan (paperwork and proposed cost), I consider that the
paper work should not
be considerable in a small scheme such as this. On the
second issue, cost, I can give no indication of this other than that it depends
to some extent on how the body corporate chooses to operate its affairs. Certain
costs are unavoidable (for example, body corporate
insurances) whilst other
costs depend on how the owners elect to operate their body corporate (eg.
whether or not to engage a professional
body corporate manager). As for the cost
of the appointment made under the terms of this order, there is no cost for the
convening
of the meeting payable to the administrator appointed. The person
appointed is not a professional body corporate manager who has
sought
appointment at a nominated price. In this regard, I note that Brisbay Pty Ltd, a
body corporate manager, states that it acts
on behalf of Kostellar and
Kootsookos. Brisbay is not currently engaged by the body corporate.
Consequently, any assistance Brisbay
provides in the convening of the meeting to
be held is to be at the cost of Kostellar and Kootsookos, and not the body
corporate.
Management and other fees will only become payable by the
body corporate if and when the body corporate determines to engage Brisbay
or
another body corporate manager, by ordinary resolution of the body corporate in
general meeting. In this regard, I note that the
vote of two of three owners
would be sufficient to carry or pass such a resolution.
In the circumstances, I am satisfied that the appointment is necessary to authorise a person to call and hold an annual general meeting, and further, that there is no reason before me why the requested appointment of an administrator should not be made, but subject to the conditions I have imposed in the order. These conditions will ensure that the interests of all owners are protected, and that all owners will be afforded the opportunity to be notified of, and participate in, the general meeting to be convened by the administrator. After this meeting, it will be for the committee elected at the meeting to operate and manage the day to day affairs of the body corporate.
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2006/139.html