![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Queensland Body Corporate and Community Management Commissioner - Adjudicators Orders |
Last Updated: 19 July 2006
REFERENCE: 0738-2005
ORDER OF AN ADJUDICATOR
MADE UNDER
PART 9 OF CHAPTER 6
BODY CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT ACT
1997
|
Number of Scheme:
|
32112
|
|
Name of Scheme:
|
Rivers on the Park
|
|
Address of Scheme:
|
8 Land Street, Toowong Qld 4066
|
TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to an application made under the abovementioned Act by
The Body Corporate for Rivers on the Park.
|
I hereby order that the period in which the Body Corporate for
Rivers on the Park can lodge a request to record a new community management
statement
showing all authorised allocations made in accordance with by-law 40
of the scheme, as specified in section 175(3) of the Body Corporate and
Community Management Act 1997, is extended to 3 months from the date of this
order.
|
STATEMENT OF ADJUDICATOR’S REASONS FOR DECISION - REF
0738-2005
"Rivers on the Park" CTS 32112
Application
Rivers on the Park Community Titles Scheme
is a 121 lot scheme under the Body Corporate and Community Management Act (Act)
and the
Act’s Accommodation Module Regulation (Accommodation Module).
This application is made by the body corporate, seeking an order for the
lodgement of a new community management statement for the
scheme. The reason
provided for this is that the body corporate wishes to lodge a new community
management statement which will
include detailed plans of the exclusive use
allocations for the complex. While an adjudicator’s order is not normally
necessary,
the body corporate advises that due to an oversight, the time has now
passed within which the body corporate is able to lodge this
statement and
therefore an adjudicator’s order is required.
Background
The scheme was established on 9 January 2004, and therefore the base
allocation period under section 174(2) of the Act expired on
9 January 2005.
During the base allocation period the original owner notified the body corporate
of the authorised exclusive use
allocations in accordance with By-law 40 of the
scheme By-laws.
The applicant states that a new Community Management
Statement (the first subsequent statement referred to in section 175(1)) has
been prepared but owing to an oversight, was not lodged with the department of
Natural Resources within 3 months after the end of
the base allocation period.
The three month period referred to above expired on 9 April
2005.
Jurisdiction
Section 276(1) of the Act
provides that an adjudicator may make an order that is just and equitable in the
circumstances (including a declaratory
order) to resolve a dispute, in the
context of a community titles scheme, about-
(a) a claimed or anticipated contravention of the Act or the community management statement; or
(b) the exercise of rights or powers, or the performance of duties, under the Act or the community management statement; or
(c) a claimed or anticipated contractual matter about-
(i) the engagement of a person as a body corporate manager or service contractor for a community titles scheme; or
(ii) the authorisation of a person as a letting agent for a community titles
scheme.
An order may require a person to act, or prohibit a person from
acting, in a way stated in the order (section 276(2)). An adjudicator's
order may contain ancillary and consequential provisions the adjudicator
considers necessary or appropriate (section
284(1)).
Decision
The Act makes provision for
exclusive use by-laws (Act, 170). Exclusive use by-laws typically specifically
identify the area of common
property that relates to each lot. However, in the
first community management statement, exclusive use by-laws often simply provide
a manner for allocating or agreeing on exclusive use areas. Subsequent
community management statements can then specifically identify
the exclusive use
area that has been allocated or agreed for the benefit of each lot.
Under the terms of by-law 40 these areas were to be allocated within a
period of twelve months from the recording of the first community
management
statement for the scheme. There is no suggestion that this was not done.
However, the Act requires that after allocations
are made they must be notified
to the body corporate and recorded under a new community management statement.
In this instance,
the time limit for lodging this new community management
statement has expired (Act, 175(3)). In the circumstances, I consider it
appropriate to grant the order sought.
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2006/1.html