![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Queensland Body Corporate and Community Management Commissioner - Adjudicators Orders |
Last Updated: 5 July 2005
REFERENCE: 0006-2005
ORDER OF AN ADJUDICATOR
MADE UNDER
PART 9 OF CHAPTER 6
BODY CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT ACT
1997
|
Number of Scheme:
|
29655
|
|
Name of Scheme:
|
26 Berry Street
|
|
Address of Scheme:
|
26 Berry Street SPRING HILL QLD 4000
|
TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to an application made under the abovementioned Act by Catherine Mary BAILEY, as a co-owner of Lot 3,
|
I hereby order that –
1. Teys Strata (Brisbane( Pty Ltd, of Level 3, 345 Ann Street, Brisbane Qld 4000 (GPO Box 5256 Brisbane Qld 4001) is appointed Administrator to call, hold and chair a general meeting ("the meeting") of the body corporate within three (3) months of the date of this order for the purpose of – • the consideration of motions included on the agenda of the meeting; and 2. The Administrator shall hold the appointment for the period beginning from the date of this order until the close of the meeting ordered. I further order that within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order the Administrator must give a copy of this order to each person whose name appears on the roll as the owner of a lot in the scheme, or if there is no roll then to each person whose name should appear on the roll, at an address that is most likely to find them. I further order that –
For the purpose of calling, holding and chairing the meeting, the
Administrator shall have all the powers of the chairperson, secretary
and
treasurer of the body corporate, and of the committee, with the exception of the
following powers –
|
STATEMENT OF ADJUDICATOR’S REASONS FOR DECISION - REF
0006-2005
"26 Berry Street" CTS 29655
The applicant, Catherine Bailey of Lot 3, has sought the following order
of an adjudicator under the Body Corporate and Community Management Act
1997 ("the Act") –
"An order to call a general meeting is sought."
JURISDICTION:
This is a dispute
between an owner (the applicant Bailey) and the body corporate (the respondent)
concerning a failure by the body
corporate to call meetings and conduct its
affairs in accordance with the legislation. This is a matter which comes within
the dispute
resolution provisions of the Act (see sections 227, 228 and
276 of the Act) and may be determined by a departmental
adjudicator.
General powers of an Adjudicator in making an
order:
Section 276(1) of the Act provides that an adjudicator may
make an order that is just and equitable in the circumstances to resolve a
dispute, in
the context
of a community titles scheme, about a claimed or
anticipated contravention of the Act or the community management statement.
An
order may require a person to act, or prohibit a person from acting in a way
stated in
the order (see section 276(2) of the
Act).
Specifically, without limiting the power of an adjudicator to make
an order under section 276(1), an adjudicator may order the body
corporate to call a general meeting of its members to deal with stated business
or to change the
date of an annual general meeting (see Item 6 of Schedule 5 to
the Act) or alternatively, the adjudicator may order the appointment
of an
administrator, and authorise the administrator to perform obligations
of the
body corporate, its committee, or a member of
its committee under this Act or
the community management statement.
An order appointing an administrator
may be the only order the adjudicator makes for an application (see section
276(4) of the Act). An adjudicator’s order may contain ancillary or
consequential provisions the adjudicator considers necessary or
appropriate
(see
section 284 of the Act).
APPLICATION:
The applicant
submits that the body corporate has not held a meeting since 19 October 2001 and
funds in the body corporate bank account
amount to only $39.74 –
presumably this would have been the statutory First Annual General Meeting
called by the original owner/developer.
Two of the other three owners
have given their consent to the application by signing copies of the
application; being Ian Poole of
Lot 4 and Mr O’Brien director of
O’Brien Built Pty Ltd of Lot 2. The remaining co-owners of Lot 1, Roland
Neil and Georgina
Catherine King, have been contacted but have not responded.
The legislation requires that the body corporate must properly administer
itself, including the holding of meetings, proper insurance, enforcement of
by-laws, maitenance of the common property and maintaining
required records.
The applicant and consenting owners wish to hold a meeting to put the body
corporate on a proper legal footing.
DETERMINATION:
"26 Berry
Street" was established as a building format plan on 21 September 2001
and comprises four lots. It is regulated under the Body Corporate and
Community Management (Small Schemes Module) Regulation 1997 ("the Small
Schemes Module").
The applicant together with the two consenting
owners represent a majority of owners comprising the body corporate. In the
circumstances,
I am satisfied that an order should be made in terms authorised
by section 38(4) of the Small Schemes Module regulations. Teys Strata
(Brisbane) Pty Ltd has consented to the appointment. I have therefore ordered
that a meeting be held which will allow the body corporate to properly
re-establish itself in order to administer its affairs in
accordance with the
legislation.
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2005/8.html