![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Queensland Body Corporate and Community Management Commissioner - Adjudicators Orders |
Last Updated: 5 July 2005
REFERENCE: 0486-2004
ORDER OF AN ADJUDICATOR
MADE UNDER
PART 9 OF CHAPTER 6
BODY CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT ACT
1997
|
Number of Scheme:
|
10757
|
|
Name of Scheme:
|
Carmen
|
|
Address of Scheme:
|
63 Neerim Drive Mooloolaba Qld 4557
|
TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to an application made under the abovementioned Act by Jocelyn Webster, the Owner of Lot 4
|
I hereby order that:
I further order that for the purposes of the Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997 (Act), the meeting shall be deemed to be an annual general meeting of the Body Corporate. I further order that for the purposes of calling and chairing the meeting, the Administrator shall have all the powers of chairperson, secretary and treasurer of the Body Corporate and of the committee, with the exception of the following powers-
I further order that within 7 days of the date of this order, Isobell Beikoff shall hand to the Administrator all books and records of the body corporate in her possession to enable the Administrator to call and hold the meeting so ordered. I further order that within 14 days of the date of this order, the Administrator shall issue each person who appears on the roll as an owner of a lot included in the scheme with a notice inviting each lot owner to nominate an eligible individual for election to the committee and to submit motions for consideration at the meeting and allowing at least 14 days for nominations and motions to be submitted. I further order that after the time allowed for owners to submit nominations and motions has expired:
I further order that the Administrator’s fees for this appointment payable by the body corporate will be $300.00 plus GST. |
STATEMENT OF ADJUDICATOR’S REASONS FOR DECISION - REF
0486-2004
"Carmen" CTS 10757
APPLICATION
This application is by Jocelyn Webster, the owner
of Lot 4 (applicant) seeking an order that an administrator be appointed.
While the applicant did not initially include the name of a person to be
appointed
as an administrator, she subsequently advised this office that she was
nominating Archers Body Corporate Management (ABCM). By letter dated 29
October 2004, Peter Cassells of ABCM agreed to an appointment for a period of
either 6 or 12 months.
The applicant’s main submissions illustrated
body corporate administration deficiencies such as:
• Motions passed at the annual general meeting held in November 2003 have not been implemented.
• Minutes have not been kept of an extraordinary general meeting held in January 2004.
• There is no sinking fund forecast.
JURISDICTION
"Carmen" Community
Titles Scheme 10757 is a 5 lot scheme under the Body Corporate and Community
Management Act 1997 (Act) and the Body Corporate and Community
Management (Standard Module) Regulation 1997 (Standard
Module).
Section 276(1) of the Act provides that an
adjudicator may make an order that is just and equitable in the circumstances
(including a declaratory
order) to resolve a dispute, in the context of a
community titles scheme, about:
(a) a claimed or anticipated contravention of the Act or the community management statement; or
(b) the exercise of rights or powers, or the performance of duties, under the Act or the community management statement; or
(c) a claimed or anticipated contractual matter about: (i) the engagement of a person as a body corporate manager or service contractor for a community titles scheme; or (ii) the authorisation of a person as a letting agent for a community titles scheme.
An order may require a person to act, or
prohibit a person from acting, in a way stated in the order (section
276(2)). An adjudicator's order may contain ancillary and consequential
provisions the adjudicator considers necessary or appropriate (section
284(1)).
SUBMISSIONS
In accordance with the Act,
submissions were called and a copy of the application was provided to the owner
of each lot (excluding
the applicant). A submission was received from Mr
Preston who stated:
• While he supported the appointment of a body corporate manager, he did not support the appointment of ABCM as he has not been consulted and has not seen quotes from other managers.
• He would support a body corporate decision to engage a manager.
DETERMINATION
The applicant included
with the application a copy of the minutes of the annual general meeting
(AGM) dated 15 November 2003 and a copy of various correspondence between
lot owners. Additional information requested by this office
was supplied by the
applicant and Mrs Beikoff, who currently has possession of the body corporate
books and records. In addition,
the applicant advised that the committee
currently consists of two persons, Mrs Beikoff and Mr Preston, and that the end
of financial
year for the scheme is 30 September.
The body corporate must
hold an AGM within three months after the end of its financial year. The
Standard Module (prior to its amendment
on 1 December 2003) required that the
agenda for an AGM must provide for the:
• Presentation of financial year accounts. • Audit of the accounts. • Approval of budgets of proposed expenditure from the administrative fund and the sinking fund. • Fixing of contributions to be paid by lot owners based on the adopted budgets.
It is evident from the information
provided that the body corporate has not:
• Held an AGM for 2004 in accordance with section 60 of the Standard Module which requires that meeting to be called and held within three months after the end of each of the scheme’s financial years. The body corporate should have held the AGM after 30 September 2004 and before 31 December 2004. • Been properly considering the statutory motions. While accounts may be presented, the minutes indicate that the body corporate does not adopt budgets, and therefore contributions are determined based on other criteria. In addition, there is no indication that the body corporate has, in the least 2 years, considered auditing of its financial statements.
In the circumstances, an
order is necessary to appoint an administrator to enable the body corporate to
hold this meeting and make
decisions required by the legislation. The applicant
has nominated ABCM to be appointed as administrator. While the applicant may
have sought a longer term appointment, I have ordered that the appointment is
limited to convening and holding the AGM for 2004.
Peter Cassels of ABCM has,
by letter dated 22 December 2004, accepted an appointment to hold an AGM for a
fee of $300 plus GST.
I consider this fee to be paid by the body corporate to
be reasonable.
Therefore, I have ordered that ABCM be appointed to
convene a proper AGM of the body corporate. It should be noted that the
appointment
lasts until the close of the meeting ordered. I have also ordered
that Isobell Beikoff hand all the books and records of the body
corporate to
ABCM to enable the proper convening and holding of the AGM.
Lot owners
will be given the opportunity to submit motions to the meeting. Therefore, an
owner wishing to submit a motion or motions
must respond to the notice given by
the Administrator under the terms of this order. The motion or motions must be
submitted in
writing to the Administrator and must be in accordance with the
requirements of the Act and the Standard Module. For instance, when
submitting
a motion proposing the engagement of a body corporate manager, the owner must
include material about the proposed terms
of the engagement which should be in
the form of a copy of the proposed body corporate management
agreement.
Even if owners intend to engage a body corporate manager, they
need to recognise the legislative requirements about the composition
of the
committee. A committee is still required to be chosen if the body corporate
authorises a manager to perform some or all of
the powers of an executive member
of the committee. The committee must consist of a chairperson, secretary and
treasurer and ordinary
members (if any). The number of persons on the committee
must be at least 3 and no more than 5.
If the owners do not want to
choose a committee, then they can authorise a manager to exercise the powers of
the committee and the
executive members of the committee. Sections 37B
to 37F of the Standard Module provide for the engagement of a manager to
carry out these functions.
The applicant has also made reference to the
financial administration of the body corporate. Lot owners need to be aware of
their
obligations with respect to the financial management of the body
corporate, of which they are the members. Section 94 of the Standard
Module provides that the body corporate must prepare an administrative and
sinking fund budget each financial year.
The budgets forecast anticipated
expenditure and form the basis for setting the annual contributions payable by
the owner of each
lot to the administrative and sinking funds. The
administrative fund budget contains estimates for recurring expenditure for each
financial year such as insurance, administrative costs and maintenance expenses.
The sinking fund budget must have regard to anticipated
capital or non-recurrent
expenditure over a period of at least 10 years. The basic purpose of the
sinking fund is to accumulate
funds to meet major expenditure at identified time
intervals. Section 105 of the Standard Module requires the body
corporate to prepare for each financial year a statement of accounts showing the
income
and spending (or receipts and payments) of the body corporate for the
financial year. Amongst other things, the statement of accounts
must include
the corresponding figures for the previous financial year, unless the statement
is for the body corporate’s first
financial year. Section 106
provides that the body corporate must have its statement of accounts for each
financial year audited by an auditor unless the body
corporate resolves by
special resolution not to have the statement audited.
Lot owners should
also note that there are 4 modules under the Act which cater for bodies
corporate with different features or circumstances.
The Standard Module
contains the most regulation. The Body Corporate and Community Management
(Small Schemes Module) Regulation 1997 (Small Schemes Module) is
aimed at schemes of less than 6 lots. This module provides less regulation for
smaller schemes, especially in relation to committees
and general meetings. For
example, the Small Schemes Module allows votes at a general meeting to occur in
a way the body corporate
decides, and can include accepting a vote by telephone
or electronic mail. If the owners would prefer less regulation, they should
investigate and consider the requirements of the Small Schemes Module and decide
whether its provisions would benefit the administration
of this body corporate.
Lot owners should be aware that the minimum requirements for adopting another
regulation module include
voting on an appropriate motion by special resolution
at a general meeting, and if the motion is passed, lodging a new community
management statement with the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and
Energy.
Finally, I would like all owners to be aware that the
Commissioner’s Office provides free information services for people
involved
in Queensland’s community titles schemes. While the Information
Service cannot provide legal advice, it does provide general
information about
the Act and the regulation modules including by responding to telephone
enquiries. The Information Service has
also produced a number of brochures on
body corporate issues. The Information Service can be contacted on 1800 060 119
during business
hours.
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2005/7.html