![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Queensland Body Corporate and Community Management Commissioner - Adjudicators Orders |
Last Updated: 5 July 2005
REFERENCE: 0034-2005
ORDER OF AN ADJUDICATOR
MADE UNDER
PART 9 OF CHAPTER 6
BODY CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT ACT
1997
|
Number of Scheme:
|
20435
|
|
Name of Scheme:
|
View Place
|
|
Address of Scheme:
|
26 Willmington Street WOOLOOWIN QLD 4030
|
TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to an application made under the abovementioned Act by
Mr John Pope, an Owner(s) of lot 2
|
I hereby declare that John Pope, an owner of lot 2
(appointee) is authorised to call, hold and chair a general meeting of
the body corporate provided that the meeting is held within three months
of the
date of this order.
I further declare that the procedures in the Standard Module governing giving notice for and holding an annual general meeting are to be followed as far as practicable. In particular, the notice requesting nominations for committee positions and submission of motions for consideration at the meeting must give owners at least 3 weeks to submit their nominations and motions. However, the appointee is not required to co-ordinate the giving of notices and the holding of the general meeting with the end of financial year date of the body corporate. |
STATEMENT OF ADJUDICATOR’S REASONS FOR DECISION - REF
0034-2005
"View Place" CTS 20435
Application
View Place Community Titles Scheme (View Place) is a 3 lot scheme
under the Body Corporate and Community Management Act (Act) and
the Act’s Standard Module Regulation (Standard Module).
John Pope, an owner of lot 2 (applicant) has brought this
application. It is submitted that the body corporate is not functioning and an
order is sought to the effect that
an annual general meeting be held to get the
body corporate functioning according to legislative requirements.
A copy
of this application has been sent to the owner of the other two lots in the
scheme. One of these owners has provided a submission
supporting the
application and stating that she wants the meeting to go ahead. The other owner
has provided a submission stating
that they agree with John Pope’s
application for the re-establishment of the body corporate on legal grounds but
stating that
she thinks this can only be established with the assistance of a
professional body corporate manager.
Decision
It is apparent that the scheme is not currently operating in accordance with
the legislation. Specifically, the legislation requires
annual meetings at
which budgets will be adopted that contain an estimate of spending from the
administrative fund for the upcoming
financial year and an estimate of spending
from the sinking fund over a ten year period (Standard Module, 94).
Further, annual general meetings must be held within 3 months after the end of
each of the scheme’s financial years (Standard Module, 60).
Given the body corporate has not been functioning in accordance with the
legislation it is appropriate to appoint the applicant to
call and hold a
general meeting of the body corporate. It appears best that this meeting be
held, as far as practicable, according
to the procedures in the legislation for
the holding of an annual general meeting. This will give all owners the
opportunity to
nominate for committee membership or to submit motions for
consideration at the meeting.
I note that one of the owners would prefer
a professional body corporate manager be appointed. However, she has not
provided any
details or likely costs of a preferred body corporate manager. In
the circumstances, I consider it appropriate to make an order
that will give
John Pope the opportunity to call and hold an annual general meeting within
three months. If John Pope requires the
assistance of a professional body
corporate manager then he can seek that assistance. Alternatively, it may be
sufficient to obtain
assistance from the information service provided by this
office and contactable by telephone on 1800 060 119.
Further, if any of
the owners wish to propose that a professional body corporate manager be
appointed then they should approach their
preferred body corporate manager and
submit for the meeting a motion and relevant documentation that would allow
owners to vote on
whether to appoint that body corporate manager.
Order
For these reasons, I make the order above.
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2005/58.html