![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Queensland Body Corporate and Community Management Commissioner - Adjudicators Orders |
Last Updated: 30 September 2005
REFERENCE: 0288-2005
ORDER OF AN ADJUDICATOR
MADE UNDER PART 9 OF CHAPTER 6
BODY CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT ACT 1997
|
Number of Scheme:
|
5042
|
|
Name of Scheme:
|
Ipomoea Court
|
|
Address of Scheme:
|
44 Ocean Street MERMAID BEACH QLD 4218
|
TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to an application made under the abovementioned Act by
the body corporate for Ipomoea Court CTS 5042
|
I hereby order that the application for an order that Peter
Lovelock, "unit 1 owner comply with by-law No.5" is dismissed.
|
STATEMENT OF ADJUDICATOR’S REASONS FOR DECISION - REF 0288-2005
"Ipomoea Court" CTS 5042
APPLICATION
This is an application by the body corporate for Ipomoea Court CTS 5042
(as amended) through its committee (the applicant) for an order that
Peter Lovelock, (Mr Lovelock) owner of Lot 1 in the scheme, complies with
By-law 5 for the scheme, and removes the timber blinds erected on the
east-facing kitchen
window which he has installed without body corporate
approval.
JURISDICTION
"Ipomoea Court" Community Title Scheme 5042 (Ipomoea) is a
scheme under the Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997 (the
Act) and the Body Corporate and Community Management (Standard Module)
Regulation 1997 (Standard Module). There are eight lots in the
scheme created under a Building Unit Plan of subdivision.
Section
276(1) of the Act provides that an adjudicator may make an order that is
just and equitable in the circumstances (including a declaratory
order) to
resolve a dispute, in the context of a community titles scheme, about-
(a) a claimed or anticipated contravention of the Act or the community management statement; or
(b) the exercise of rights or powers, or the performance of duties, under the Act or the community management statement; or
(c) a claimed or anticipated contractual matter about-
(i) the engagement of a person as a body corporate manager or service contractor for a community titles scheme; or
(ii) the authorisation of a person as a letting agent for a community titles
scheme.
An order may require a person to act, or prohibit a person from
acting, in a way stated in the order (section 276(2)). An
adjudicator’s order may contain ancillary and consequential provisions the
adjudicator considers necessary or appropriate
(section 284(1)).
SUBMISSIONS
Submissions were invited from all eight lot owners in accordance with
section 243(2)(b) of the Act.
Submissions were received from Paul
Lomaz of Lot 5; Daniel Stosur of Lot 2; Nathan Reeves, of Lot 8 (who is also
the secretary for
the scheme); Dale Webb, attorney for Mrs Daphne Webb of Lot
4; and Mr Lovelock. I do not propose to summarise the submissions
in the light
of my determination
DETERMINATION
In any dispute concerning by-laws, it is necessary first to study the wording of the by-law which it is alleged has been breached.
The body corporate has copied out "by-law 5" as follows-
By-law
no.5
"No external blinds shall be erected and all curtains and all blinds on the external windows of the building shall be of a uniform off-white backing or such other colour as the Council of the Body Corporate shall from time to time nominate or require an (sic) order to have a standard and orderly appearance for the building."
Mr Lovelock in his
submission has also provided a copy of a document headed "By-Laws of Ipomoea
Court", where the first word, which
may be relevant as I shall later explain,
has been crossed out. That first word may be "Recorded" although it is not
possible to
say with any certainty.
However, a by-law for a scheme can
only be a by-law if it is recorded as such in the Land Titles Registry of the
Department of Natural
Resources and Mines, (the Titles Office). Section
179 of the Act states –
179 Commencement of
by-laws
A by-law comes into force on the day the registrar records the community management statement containing the by-law or a later date stated in the by-law.
Historically, when the Act came into effect in
July 1997, existing schemes such as Ipomoea were deemed to have an
"interim" community management statement in which were included by-laws which
were identical to the by-laws
that, immediately before the commencement of the
Act, were the by-laws in force for the scheme (section 337(2)(g)(i) Act.)
Bodies corporate were then given three years in which to record a new Community
Management Statement (CMS) which could include,
amongst other things, new
by-laws adopted by the scheme. If a scheme did not register its own
particulars within three years of
the assent of the Act, the Registrar recorded
a CMS for the scheme, giving the scheme a Standard Module regulation as the
governing
regulation, and stating as
follows-
"By-Laws
Taken to be those in effect as at 13
July 2000"
The scheme therefore kept whatever by-laws it had prior to
the recording of the standard CMS, which were the by-laws on the "interim"
CMS.
In other words, if a body corporate did not wish to update its by-laws, they
remained as they were in 1997 before the commencement
of the Act. A standard
Community Management Statement for Ipomoea was recorded by the Registrar
on 15th July 2000 in accordance with the current section 339(2) of the
Act.
There are no by-laws recorded on the CMS in the Titles Office for
Ipomeoa. Prior to 1997 there have been no previous dealings where
individual by-laws have been recorded.
In such circumstances, the
by-laws in force in 1997, were those under the former legislation, the
Building Units and Group Titles Act 1980 (BUGTA).
Section 30 of
BUGTA states -
"30 By-laws
(1) Except as provided in this section the by-laws set forth in Schedule 3 shall be the by-laws in force in respect of each plan."
Section 30 goes on to set out how a body corporate
may make, add to or repeal its own by-laws by notification on the prescribed
form
in the
land registry and recording by the Registrar of Titles
Section 30(3) states –
"An amendment of, addition to or repeal of the by-laws has no force or effect until the registrar of titles has, pursuant to a notification in the prescribed form lodged in the land registry by the body corporate, recorded the notification on the registered plan."
The by-laws set out
in Schedule 3 of BUGTA are the only by-laws that can apply to Ipomoea
since there are no other by-laws recorded. The by-laws in Schedule 3 of BUGTA
are set out at the end of this decision, and do not
contain any specific
references to blinds. By-Law 8, concerning appearance of a building in a
building units plan (BUP) such as
Ipomeoa, requires permission in writing
of the committee to " hang any washing, towel, bedding, clothing or other
article or display any sign, advertisement, placard, banner, pamphlet or like
matter on any part of his or her lot in
such a way as to be visible
from outside the building."
Under the "ejusdem generis" rule
of statutory interpretation, which provides that the interpretation to be given
to general matters is constrained or defined
by reference to the specific
matters which precede them, I do not find "any sign, advertisement, placard,
banner, pamphlet or like matter" could refer to timber blinds. In my view,
the by-law aims to address the problem of unsightly advertising material and not
to regulate
a choice of soft furnishings. Nor do I find that "any washing,
towel, bedding, clothing or other article" whilst technically could include
curtains, could be interpreted to require that lot owners indeed remove their
curtains from hanging
in windows, and therefore should not be interpreted as
having reference either to fabric or timber blinds.
The document provided
by Mr Lovelock, the terms of which he has allegedly breached are not by-laws for
the scheme. They may well
be "house rules" or a similar code for administering
the scheme in a proper manner but they cannot be enforced by a lot owner or
the
body corporate, and as such I cannot find that Mr. Lovelock has breached a
by-law or ask him to take any remedial action. I
must dismiss this
application.
The body corporate may, of course, take steps to record that
document as its by-laws in the Titles Office. The adoption, amendment
and
repeal of by-laws requires a new CMS to be lodged which is not a complicated
process, and any land titles registry in Queensland
can advise on the forms and
fees required. In order to lodge a new CMS however, the body corporate ( ie,
not the committee) must
at a general meeting pass a special resolution that a
new CMS is recorded. (section 62(3) Act). The new CMS must be recorded
within 3 months of the general meeting at which the resolution is passed.
(section 65 Act). A special resolution requires that two-thirds of
all those voting for or against (not of all lot owners) be in favour
and not more than 25% of all lot owners ( ie 2 ) be against.
Whilst the
committee may take steps to enforce its by-laws, it cannot at committee level
agree to change or not to change the by-laws.
This is a matter for the body
corporate. The committee may of course propose a motion to a general meeting
with its recommendation
that a certain by-law be amended or deleted. In this
manner, the body corporate can "drive" its by-laws and there is no reason why
a
scheme should try to work with former "by-laws" which may no longer be
applicable to the scheme or which may be against the wishes
of the majority of
lot owners. Any lot owner may propose a motion to a general meeting that a
by-law be included in the CMS or
amended etc. Provided the voting is by special
resolution at a general meeting, this is entirely a matter for the lot owners to
decide
themselves.
____________________________________________________________________
Schedule
3 By–laws
section 30
1 Noise
A proprietor or occupier
of a lot shall not upon the parcel
create any noise likely to interfere with
the peaceful
enjoyment of the proprietor or occupier of another lot or
of
any person lawfully using common property.
2 Vehicles
Save
where a by-law made pursuant to section 30(7)of this
Act authorises a
proprietor or occupier so to do, the proprietor
or occupier of a lot shall
not park or stand any motor or other
vehicle upon common property except with
the consent in
writing of the body corporate.
3 Obstruction
A
proprietor or occupier of a lot shall not obstruct lawful use
of common
property by any person.
4 Damage to lawns etc. on common property
A
proprietor or occupier of a lot shall not--
(a) damage any lawn, garden,
tree, shrub, plant or flower
being part of or situated upon common property;
or
(b) except with the consent in writing of the body corporate,
use for
his or her own purposes as a garden any portion
of the common
property.
5 Damage to common property
(1) A proprietor or
occupier of a lot shall not mark, paint, drive
nails or screws or the like
into, or otherwise damage or deface,
any structure that forms part of the
common property except
with the consent in writing of the body corporate, but
this
by-law does not prevent a proprietor or person authorised by
the
proprietor from installing--
(a) any locking or other safety device for
protection of his
or her lot against intruders; or
(b) any screen or other
device to prevent entry of animals or
insects upon his or her lot.
(2)
Provided that the locking or other safety device or, as the case
may be,
screen or other device is constructed in a competent
manner, is maintained in
a state of good and serviceable repair
by the proprietor and does not detract
from the amenity of the
building.
6 Behaviour of invitees
A
proprietor or occupier of a lot shall take all reasonable steps
to ensure
that his or her invitees do not behave in a manner
likely to interfere with
the peaceful enjoyment of the
proprietor or occupier of another lot or of any
person lawfully
using common property.
7 Depositing rubbish etc. on
common property
A proprietor or occupier of a lot shall not deposit or
throw
upon the common property any rubbish, dirt, dust or other
material
likely to interfere with the peaceful enjoyment of the
proprietor or occupier
of another lot or of any person lawfully
using the common property.
8
Appearance of building
In the case of a building units plan, a proprietor
or occupier of
a lot shall not, except with the consent in writing of the
body
corporate, hang any washing, towel, bedding, clothing or
other
article or display any sign, advertisement, placard,
banner, pamphlet or like
matter on any part of his or her lot in
such a way as to be visible from
outside the building.
9 Storage of flammable liquids etc.
A
proprietor or occupier of a lot shall not, except with the
consent in writing
of the body corporate, use or store upon his
or her lot or upon the common
property any flammable
chemical, liquid or gas or other flammable material,
other
than chemicals, liquids, gases or other material used or
intended to
be used for domestic purposes, or any such
chemical, liquid, gas or other
material in a fuel tank of a motor
vehicle or internal combustion
engine.
10 Garbage disposal
A proprietor or occupier of a lot
shall--
(a) save where the body corporate provides some other
means of
disposal of garbage, maintain within his or her
lot, or on such part of the
common property as may be
authorised by the body corporate, in clean and
dry
condition and adequately covered, a receptacle for
garbage;
(b)
comply with all local government local laws and
ordinances relating to the
disposal of garbage;
(c) ensure that the health, hygiene and comfort of
the
proprietor or occupier of any other lot is not adversely
affected by
his or her disposal of garbage.
11 Keeping of animals
Subject to
section 30(12), a proprietor or occupier of a lot
shall not, without the
approval in writing of the body
corporate, keep any animal upon his or her
lot or the common
property.
The Commissioner’s office offers
a free Information Service on 1800 060 119 and will be able to advise on the
content of by-laws
and how to contact a land titles registry. The service is
available to all members of the public, so that committee members and
lot owners
may obtain information directly. There are also brochures available ( eg a
brochure entitled "By-Laws") from the Information
Service and on the
Commissioner’s website at www.dtftwid.qld.gov.au/Dispute+Resolution/BCCM
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2005/458.html