![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Queensland Body Corporate and Community Management Commissioner - Adjudicators Orders |
Last Updated: 13 July 2007
REFERENCE: 0080-2004A
INTERIM ORDER OF AN
ADJUDICATOR
MADE UNDER PART 9 OF CHAPTER 6
BODY CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT ACT
1997
|
Number of Scheme:
|
18161
|
|
Name of Scheme:
|
Cairns Village Resort
|
|
Address of Scheme:
|
Corner Anderson Road and Bruce Highway CAIRNS QLD 4870
|
TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to an application made under the
abovementioned Act by
the body corporate for Cairns Village Resort
|
I hereby order that the interim order made on 5 March 2004, as
follows -
that, in respect of the exclusive use areas of lot 99, owned by William and Jannine Nason (respondents), and pending a final determination in respect of this dispute:
is extended pending a final determination of the dispute. This is an interim order and will remain in effect for a period of not longer than ten months. It is the responsibility of the applicant to apply to extend this order if no final determination has been made within that period. This order will automatically lapse upon a final order being made or this application being withdrawn. |
STATEMENT OF ADJUDICATOR’S REASONS FOR DECISION - REF
0080-2004A
"Cairns Village Resort" CTS
18161
Pursuant to this application, the body corporate (applicant)
sought interim access to exclusive use areas of lot 99 in the scheme, lot 99
being owned by William and Jannine Nason (respondents). On 5 March 2004
an interim order was granted that gave interim access to certain exclusive use
areas on the terms specified in
the order above.
In a separate
application the body corporate sought to invalidate the community management
statement of the body corporate, which
would have also invalidated the grant of
exclusive use over the areas in
dispute.[1] Pursuant to that
application an order was issued on 25 June 2004 declaring that the grant of
exclusive use was oppressive and unreasonable.
This order required the body
corporate to lodge a new community management statement within 1 year to remove
the grant of exclusive
use. However, presumably the body corporate has not yet
done this and has therefore sought the extension of the interim order on
this
application.
The body corporate is presently entitled to lodge a new
community management statement pursuant to the order of 25 June 2004 that
would
remove the grant of exclusive use over the disputed areas (Act, 62(4)).
I therefore have some questions regarding why the body corporate is seeking an
extension of the interim order rather than proceeding
to lodge a new community
management statement. However, I understand that the parties have been involved
in settlement negotiations
to try to resolve a number of other issues in dispute
between them. Presumably, the body corporate has refrained from lodging the
new
community management statement pending this attempt to reach a negotiated
settlement.
The solicitors for the body corporate have now informed
this office that settlement negotiations have not been successful. The
respondents’
solicitors have said that their client has been observing the
terms of the interim order but consider that the subject matter has
been
resolved by the order of 25 June 2004 and any challenge to the occupation
authorities would need to be the subject of a separate
application. This seems
to be correct to the extent that specific provisions of the legislation deal
with the body corporate authorising
access to areas covered by exclusive
occupation authorities (Accommodation Module, 89(6)). However, I do not
agree that the subject matter of the present application has been resolved until
such time as a new community
management statement removing the grant of
exclusive use is registered.
The interim order is presently due to
expire by 5 September 2004 and I therefore consider it appropriate to extend the
operation of
this interim order (Act, 279). The body corporate is
required to lodge the new community management statement before 25 June 2005. I
will therefore extend the
interim order for a period of ten months from today to
cover that period.
[1] Application 791 of 2003.
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2004/673.html