![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Queensland Body Corporate and Community Management Commissioner - Adjudicators Orders |
Last Updated: 30 September 2005
REFERENCE: 0756-2003
ORDER OF AN ADJUDICATOR
MADE UNDER
PART 9 OF CHAPTER 6
BODY CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY
MANAGEMENT ACT 1997
|
Number of Scheme:
|
25274
|
|
Name of Scheme:
|
22 Gray Street
|
|
Address of Scheme:
|
22 Gray Street, SOUTHPORT QLD 4215
|
TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to an application made under the abovementioned Act by
Leonard Charles Riseley, the co-owner of lot 3
|
I hereby order that -
I further order that within seven (7) days of the date of this order the administrator must give a copy of this order to each person whose name appears on the roll as the owner of a lot in the scheme ("lot owners"). I further order that -
I further order that the administrator shall renew the body corporate building and public liability insurance currently held with CGU Insurance Limited, which is due for renewal on 31 January 2004. I further order that the administrator is hereby authorised to pay the requisite insurance premium from the body corporate funds currently held in an account with the Bank of Queensland. |
STATEMENT OF ADJUDICATOR’S REASONS FOR DECISION - REF
0756-2003
"22 Gray Street" CTS 25274
The applicant, Leonard Charles Riseley, has sought an order of an adjudicator under the Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997 (the Act) as follows:
That an administrator, Mr Dale Armstrong, be appointed to convene a
requisitioned extraordinary general meeting following resignation
of Mrs Irene
Favot of BUGT Management body corporate managers and assist with re-establishing
the effective management of the body
corporate’s affairs on behalf of all
unit owners as soon as possible.
Section 276(1) of the Act
provides that an adjudicator may make an order that is just and equitable in the
circumstances (including a declaratory
order) to resolve a dispute, in the
context of a community titles scheme, about-
(a) a claimed or anticipated contravention of the Act or the community management statement; or
(b) the exercise of rights or powers, or the performance of duties, under the Act or the community management statement; or
(c) a claimed or anticipated contractual matter about-
(i) the engagement of a person as a body corporate manager or service contractor for a community titles scheme; or
(ii) the authorisation of a person as a letting agent for a community titles
scheme.
An order may require a person to act, or prohibit a person from
acting, in a way stated in the order (section 276(2)). An adjudicator's
order may contain ancillary and consequential provisions the adjudicator
considers necessary or appropriate (section 284(1)).
Specifically,
without limiting the power of an adjudicator to make an order under section
276(1), an adjudicator may order the body corporate to call a general
meeting of its members to deal with stated business or to change the
date of an
annual general meeting (Act Schedule 5 section 6). Alternatively, the
adjudicator may order the appointment of an administrator,
and authorise the
administrator to perform obligations
of the body corporate, its committee, or a
member of its committee under this
Act or the community management statement
(Act Schedule
5 section 23).
The administrator has the powers given to
the administrator under the order (section 301(2)). Section
301(4) provides that the order may –
a) withdraw all or particular stated powers from the body corporate (and any delegate of the body corporate) or from stated officers of the body corporate until the administrator has taken the necessary action to secure compliance with the obligations; and b) require officers or delegates of the body corporate to take stated action to help perform the work the administrator is required to perform; and c) fix the administrator’s remuneration.
An order appointing an administrator may be the only order the adjudicator makes for an application (section 276(4)(a)). An adjudicator’s order may contain ancillary or consequential provisions the adjudicator considers necessary or appropriate (section 284(1)).
The applicant stated in his supporting grounds that the former body
corporate manager has resigned, and he has collected the books
and records of
the body corporate from that former manager, and, with the assistance of another
owner, opened a body corporate bank
account with the Bank of Queensland. The
applicant further stated that owners need help to re-establish the effective
management
of the body corporate’s affairs in order to pay outstanding
accounts. By further letter dated 28 January 2004, the applicant
advised that
the body corporate building insurance is due on 31 January 2004.
All
owners were invited to respond to the application. Submissions were received
from three owners, two of whom supported the application.
One of those owners
has since sold his lot, but I do not consider that that diminishes the fact that
he specifically supported the
appointment of an administrator "to solve the
current situation the unit holders find themselves in ...".
The owner
who opposed the application claimed that he has been elected secretary of the
body corporate, and referred to minutes of
a meeting lodged with another
application as evidence to support this assertion. I am aware of another
application that has been
made to this office in which this same owner also
asserts that he is the elected secretary. That application purports to have
been
made by the body corporate, but there is no evidence that there has been a
valid committee resolution authorising the application.
That application is
accompanied by a copy of minutes of a meeting purportedly held on 19 July 2003.
That application remains unresolved
at this time.
I have not been
requested in this application to make a determination in relation to the
validity of the meeting purportedly held
on 19 July 2003, at which two owners
were allegedly elected to committee positions, nor do I intend to do so.
Suffice to say, it
is apparent from the material before me that the
administration of the body corporate is presently in disarray.
The
person nominated by the applicant to be appointed as administrator to call a
meeting has consented in writing to that nomination.
I consider that the
interests of all owners will be best served if an extraordinary general meeting
is held at which, amongst other
things, a committee can be properly elected, and
owners can decide if they wish to have the administration of the body corporate
placed in the hands of a professional body corporate manager or not. No doubt
there will be other matters that owners may wish to
have considered at the same
time. I also note that several of the proposed motions listed on the agenda of
the previously requested
extraordinary general meeting have now been overtaken
by events, such that further consideration of them would be
superfluous.
I have also specifically ordered that the administrator
attend to the renewal of the body corporate building and public liability
insurance which falls due on 31 January 2004.
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2004/57.html