![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Queensland Body Corporate and Community Management Commissioner - Adjudicators Orders |
Last Updated: 30 September 2005
REFERENCE: 0051-2004
ORDER OF AN ADJUDICATOR
MADE UNDER
PART 9 OF CHAPTER 6
BODY CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY
MANAGEMENT ACT 1997
|
Number of Scheme:
|
13785
|
|
Name of Scheme:
|
Vallarta
|
|
Address of Scheme:
|
4 Parnoo Street CHEVRON ISLAND QLD 4217
|
TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to an application made under the abovementioned Act by Luke Daniel Jess Moreta, the owner of lot 1
|
I hereby order that the application by Luke Daniel Jess Moreta, the
owner of lot 1, for an order for approval to leave installed a bedroom window
air conditioner, is dismissed.
I further order that unless Luke Daniel Jess Moreta, the owner of lot 1, obtains the approval of the body corporate within two (2) months of the date of this order by way of special resolution for the air conditioning unit installed to remain, then it must be removed, and the common property reinstated, within such time. |
STATEMENT OF ADJUDICATOR’S REASONS FOR DECISION - REF
0051-2004
"Vallarta" CTS 13785
The applicant, Luke Daniel Jess Moreta, the owner of lot 1, has sought the
following order of an adjudicator under the Body Corporate and Community
Management Act 1997 (the Act) quote –
The outcome I am seeking is for the approval to leave installed a bedroom window air conditioner.
Section 276(1) of the Act
provides that an adjudicator may make an order that is just and equitable in the
circumstances (including a declaratory
order) to resolve a dispute, in the
context of a community titles scheme, about-
(a) a claimed or anticipated contravention of the Act or the community management statement; or
(b) the exercise of rights or powers, or the performance of duties, under the Act or the community management statement; or
(c) a claimed or anticipated contractual matter about-
(i) the engagement of a person as a body corporate manager or service contractor for a community titles scheme; or
(ii) the authorisation of a person as a letting agent for a community titles
scheme.
An order may require a person to act, or prohibit a person from
acting, in a way stated in the order (section 276(2)). An adjudicator's
order may contain ancillary and consequential provisions the adjudicator
considers necessary or appropriate (section 284(1)).
The
scheme
The scheme is a subdivision of 4 lots registered under a
building unit plan (now a building format plan). The regulation module applying
to the scheme is the standard module.
The application and
submissions
This office sought submissions in respect of the
application from the committee and all owners. I do not intend to set out in any
detail the applicant’s grounds, nor the contents of submissions in
response. I am satisfied that all parties are aware of the
position of the other
from the application, submissions and the right of reply processes. I therefore
intend only to refer to those
materials necessary for a determination of the
issues raised.
The applicant seeks a determination that he be authorised
to keep the air conditioning unit he has installed in the bedroom of a lot.
The
air conditioning unit is an order style, window mounted air conditioning unit.
Photographic evidence of the unit suggests that
it is not new, but probably
second hand. The back of the unit protrudes onto common property of the parcel.
The installation of the unit is an improvement to common property for
the benefit of the lot. Section 114 provides as follows –
114
Improvements to common property by lot owner--Act, s 159
(1) The
body corporate may, if asked by the owner of a lot, authorise the owner to make
an improvement to the common property for the
benefit of the owner’s
lot.
(2) The improvement must be authorised by special resolution of
the body corporate unless--
(a) the improvement is a minor improvement;
and
(b) the improvement does not detract from the appearance of any lot
included in, or common property for, the scheme; and
(c) the body corporate
is satisfied that use and enjoyment of the authorised improvement is not likely
to promote a breach of the
owner’s duties as an occupier.
(3) An
authorisation may be given under this section on conditions the body corporate
considers appropriate.
(4) The owner of a lot who is given an
authority under this section42--
(a) must comply with conditions of the
authority; and
(b) must maintain the improvement made under the authority in
good condition, unless excused by the body corporate.
The requirements of
the section for such an improvement are a special resolution of the body
corporate in general meeting. That is,
it will be necessary for the applicant to
submit a motion for inclusion on the agenda of the next general meeting of the
body corporate
seeking approval for the air conditioning unit. If approval is
given by special resolution, then the applicant may retain the unit.
However, if
approval is not given, then it will be necessary for the applicant to remove the
unit as installed and reinstate the
common property. I have ordered that unless
the applicant obtains the relevant approval of the body corporate within two (2)
months
by way of special resolution for the air conditioning unit installed to
remain, then it must be removed, and the common property
reinstated.
Consequently, the order sought by the applicant will be dismissed.
Whilst the applicant has sought an order that the air conditioning as
installed be approved, I have dismissed this application, and
instead ordered
its removal unless approval for the same is obtained within a specified time
period. There are a number of reasons
for refusing to order in terms sought by
the applicant including:
• The applicant’s failure to obtain approval by way of special resolution as required by section 114 of the standard module;
• The fact that other owners have previously followed correct procedures and obtained necessary approvals;
• The age and style of the air conditioning unit installed.
There is no doubt in my view that it is a reasonable
expectation of an owner to be allowed the use of common property for the
purposes
of air conditioning. However, in so authorising the use of common
property for this purpose, the body corporate is able to set or
establish the
conditions under which it will be done. These may reasonably include the type
and style of air conditioning unit. These
days, there appears to be a clear
preference for split system air conditioning units, as opposed to wall mounted
type units, both
for aesthetics and other reasons. Further, the body corporate
is able to include conditions as to the location of the unit on common
property
and the method of installation. In determining any of these conditions, the body
corporate must act reasonably.
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2004/320.html