![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Queensland Body Corporate and Community Management Commissioner - Adjudicators Orders |
Last Updated: 17 May 2005
REFERENCE: 0252-2003
ORDER OF AN ADJUDICATOR
MADE UNDER
PART 9 OF CHAPTER 6
BODY CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY
MANAGEMENT ACT 1997
|
Number of Scheme:
|
16779
|
|
Name of Scheme:
|
Gold Coast Central
|
|
Address of Scheme:
|
Cnr Barney Street & Brighton Parade SOUTHPORT QLD 4215
|
TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to an application made under the abovementioned Act by Lewis Francis Felici as trustee, the owner of lot 21
STATEMENT OF ADJUDICATOR’S REASONS FOR DECISION - REF
0252-2003
"Gold Coast Central" CTS 16779
The applicant, Lewis Francis Felici, has sought an order of an adjudicator under the Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997 (the Act) as follows:
The money spent between May 2002-January 2003 is $99133.45. This money should be put back into the body corporate administrative fund.
Section 276(1) of the Act provides that an adjudicator may make an
order that is just and equitable in the circumstances (including a declaratory
order) to resolve a dispute, in the context of a community titles scheme,
about-
(a) a claimed or anticipated contravention of the Act or the community management statement; or
(b) the exercise of rights or powers, or the performance of duties, under the Act or the community management statement; or
(c) a claimed or anticipated contractual matter about-
(i) the engagement of a person as a body corporate manager or service contractor for a community titles scheme; or
(ii) the authorisation of a person as a letting agent for a community titles
scheme.
An order may require a person to act, or prohibit a person from
acting, in a way stated in the order (section 276(2)). An adjudicator's
order may contain ancillary and consequential provisions the adjudicator
considers necessary or appropriate (section 284(1)).
In the
supporting grounds, the applicant stated that the amount involved was expended
between 1 November 2001 and 31 October 2002.
The applicant further stated that
body corporate approval for security to be employed was not given until the
annual general meeting
held on 10 January 2003, therefore the earlier sum was
spent without body corporate approval.
The body corporate committee and
all owners were invited to respond to the application. Eleven owners responded,
and all but one
of those supported the application.
I have recently made
orders in two other applications relating to this scheme. Those orders required
that an extraordinary general
meeting be held at which various outstanding
matters, such as maintenance and repair of common property, insurance and the
appointment
of an administrator, are to be considered.
In my view, the
subject matter of this application should also be considered by owners at that
meeting. As I stated in the reasons
accompanying the decision in applications
0753-2002 and 0456-2003, this scheme has had a troubled history. It is apparent
that committee
decisions were made under less than optimum conditions, and in
most unusual circumstances, given the body corporate insurer’s
decision to
cancel the insurance cover. It is important that owners are given detailed
reasons for the committee’s decisions
over the past 15 months.
If
the applicant wishes to have this matter further considered, then he should
propose an appropriate motion for inclusion on the
agenda of the ordered
meeting, when invited to do so by the secretary. For the applicant’s
information, I have set out below
the orders made by me on 8 August 2003 in
application 0456-2003:
I hereby order that, within 3
months of the date of this order, the body corporate shall call and hold an
extraordinary general meeting at which
the following matters shall be
considered:
• The appointment of Clare Cauchi of Gold Coast Body Corporate Specialists as administrator of the scheme until such time as the body corporate obtains building, public liability and office bearers’ insurance
• The appointment of an onsite manager
• The consent of the body corporate to a new community management statement amending the existing community management statement in relation to certain exclusive use allocations and special privileges attaching to lot 3
• A programme for the maintenance and repair of common property
• Any other motions proposed by owners for consideration at the meeting provided that such motions are notified to the secretary within 21 days of the date of this order
I further order that
a copy of this order and the accompanying statement of reasons, together with a
notice inviting owners to submit motions for
consideration at the meeting hereby
ordered, shall be forwarded by the secretary to all owners within 7 days of the
date of this
order.
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2003/60.html