![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Queensland Body Corporate and Community Management Commissioner - Adjudicators Orders |
Last Updated: 10 September 2007
REFERENCE: 0778-2002
ORDER OF AN ADJUDICATOR
MADE UNDER
PART 9 OF CHAPTER 6
BODY CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY
MANAGEMENT ACT 1997
|
Number of Scheme:
|
15228
|
|
Name of Scheme:
|
Admiralty Gardens
|
|
Address of Scheme:
|
5 Thornely Close BELLARA QLD 4507
|
TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to an application made under the abovementioned Act by
the Body Corporate for Admiralty Gardens
I hereby declare that each lot
shall pay the proportion of the insurance premium attributable to building and
contents or reinstatement insurance based
on the interest schedule lot
entitlement for the scheme, and for all other components of the insurance
premium, including GST and
stamp duty, the premium payable by each lot is
proportioned according to the contributions schedule lot entitlement for the
scheme.
STATEMENT OF ADJUDICATOR’S REASONS FOR DECISION -
REF 0778-2002
"Admiralty Gardens" CTS 15228
The applicant, the body corporate for Admiralty Gardens, has sought the
following order of an Adjudicator under the Body Corporate and Community
Management Act 1997 (the Act), quote –
Seeking an order (decision) on insurance relating to breakdown and distribution to lot owners ...
Section 276(1) of
the Act provides that an adjudicator may make an order that is just and
equitable in the circumstances (including a declaratory
order) to resolve a
dispute, in the context of a community titles scheme, about-
(a) a claimed or anticipated contravention of the Act or the community management statement; or
(b) the exercise of rights or powers, or the performance of duties, under the Act or the community management statement; or
(c) a claimed or anticipated contractual matter about-
(i) the engagement of a person as a body corporate manager or service contractor for a community titles scheme; or
(ii) the authorisation of a person as a letting agent for a community titles
scheme.
An order may require a person to act, or prohibit a person from
acting, in a way stated in the order (section 276(2)). An adjudicator's
order may contain ancillary and consequential provisions the adjudicator
considers necessary or appropriate (section 284(1)).
The applicant
states –
... Under my current understanding insurance is distributed as per proportion to lot owners interests as provided in the CMS.
The
applicant then attaches a copy of the body corporate’s current insurance
invoice, and requests –
Can the Commissioner’s office provide an accurate direction to which of these individual items may be distributed between contributions and interest for lot owners.
The applicant’s terminology is a
little unclear. The applicant speaks of distribution rather than contribution.
Distribution
implies or suggests a payment or dividend to owners.
Contributions however are the amounts paid by owners to the body
corporate for administration and sinking fund expenses. I assume that what the
applicant is in fact intending
is the proportion of contributions payable by
individual owners to the body corporate for insurance related charges. I will
proceed
on this basis.
There are four lots in the scheme. Both the
contribution and interest schedule lot entitlements are –
Lot 1
12
Lot 2 13
Lot 3 17
Lot 4 34
Total 76
The five components of the body corporate premium are –
Building and contents 709.97
Public liability
84.35
Fidelity guarantee 44.97
Personal accident events
44.97
GST and Stamp duty 171.24
Total 1055.50
The
scheme is registered under a building unit plan of subdivision (now a building
format plan).
130 Premium
(1) The owner of each lot that
is included in the scheme and is covered by reinstatement insurance required to
be taken out by the body
corporate is liable to reimburse the body corporate for
the proportion of the premium for reinstatement insurance that reflects--
(a)
for a lot created under a building or volumetric format plan of subdivision--the
interest schedule lot entitlement of the lot;
and
(b) for a lot created under
a standard format plan of subdivision--the cost of reinstating the buildings on
the lot.
(2) The body corporate may adjust the amount payable by a lot
owner under subsection (1) in a way that fairly reflects--
(a) the extent to
which the fixtures and fittings forming part of the lot are of a higher standard
than the fixtures and fittings
of lots included in the scheme generally;
or
(b) the proportion of the total risks covered by the policy attributable
to activities carried on, or proposed to be carried on, on
the owner’s
lot.
Example of paragraph (b)--
In a community titles scheme, the
buyer of a lot starts a small manufacturing business requiring the use and
storage of flammable
chemicals. The insurance premium for the body corporate
policy is increased by the insurer because of the increased risk of damage
through fire. The lot owner’s reimbursement liability for the insurance
premium will include the amount of the increase.
(3) The reimbursement
for which the owner of a lot is liable may be recovered by the body corporate as
part of the owner’s annual
contribution to the administrative
fund.
Under section 130(1)(a), the premium for reinstatement of the building is proportioned between owners on the basis of the interest schedule lot entitlements. The applicant should also note the provisions of subsection (2) set out above and also sections 131 and 132 of the standard module.
All other forms of body corporate insurance, including public liability insurance which the body corporate is required to maintain under section 136, are proportioned between owners according to the contributions schedule lot entitlements for each lot. (see section 95(5) of the standard module).
This distinction between reinstatement insurance (or building and contents as it is commonly known) is only relevant were the interest and contribution schedule lot entitlements differ. Where the two schedules are the same, as is the case here, then the distinction is not relevant as practically the result will be the same.
So to conclude, each lot should pay the
proportion of the insurance premium attributable to building and contents or
reinstatement
insurance based on the interest schedule lot entitlement, and for
all other parts of the insurance premium, including GST and stamp
duty, the
premium payable by each lot is proportioned according to the contributions
schedule lot entitlement.
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2003/539.html