![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Queensland Body Corporate and Community Management Commissioner - Adjudicators Orders |
Last Updated: 17 May 2005
REFERENCE: 0589-2003
ORDER OF AN ADJUDICATOR
MADE UNDER
PART 9 OF CHAPTER 6
BODY CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY
MANAGEMENT ACT 1997
|
Number of Scheme:
|
30190
|
|
Name of Scheme:
|
Ipswich Unilink Village
|
|
Address of Scheme:
|
191 - 199 Warwick Road, IPSWICH QLD 4305
|
TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to an application made under the abovementioned Act by the body corporate,
1. Stewart Silver King & Burns (Brisbane) Pty Ltd, Level 2 The Precinct, 12 Browning Street, West End Qld 4101 (PO Box 5955, West End Qld 4101), is appointed Administrator to call, hold and chair a general meeting ("the meeting") of "Ipswich Unilink Village" within three (3) months of the date of this order for the purpose of the election of persons to the vacant committee positions of chairperson and ordinary members. I further order that – (1) For the purpose of calling, holding and chairing the meeting, the Administrator shall have all the powers of the chairperson, secretary and treasurer of the body corporate, and of the committee, with the exception of the following powers - • to further delegate any of those powers to another person; or
|
STATEMENT OF ADJUDICATOR’S REASONS FOR DECISION -
REF 0589-2003
"Ipswich Unilink Village" CTS
30190
The applicant body corporate has sought the following order of an
adjudicator under the Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997
("the Act") –
"We wish to convene an Extraordinary General Meeting to conduct an open ballot to appoint the owners who have nominated to stand on the committee."
JURISDICTION:
This is a dispute
between an owner (the applicants Graham) and the body corporate (the
respondent), concerning a failure by the body
corporate to call meetings, keep
records and conduct its affairs in accordance with the legislation. This is a
matter which comes
within the dispute resolution provisions of the Act (see
sections 227, 228 and 276 of the Act).
General powers of an
Adjudicator in making an order:
Section 276(1) of the Act provides that
an adjudicator may make an order that is just and equitable in the circumstances
to resolve a dispute, in
the context
of a community titles scheme, about a
claimed or anticipated contravention of the Act or the community management
statement.
An order may require a person to act, or prohibit a person from
acting in a way stated in
the order (see section 276(2) of the
Act).
Specifically, without limiting the power of an adjudicator to make
an order under section 276(1), an adjudicator may order the body corporate to
call a general meeting of its members to deal with stated business or to change
the
date of an annual general meeting (see Item 6 of Schedule 5 to the Act) or
alternatively, the adjudicator may order the appointment
of an administrator,
and authorise the administrator to perform obligations
of the body corporate,
its committee, or a member of
its committee under this Act or the community
management statement.
An order appointing an administrator may be the
only order the adjudicator makes for an application (see section 276(4) of the
Act). An adjudicator’s order may contain ancillary or consequential
provisions the adjudicator considers necessary or
appropriate
(see section 284
of the Act).
APPLICATION:
"Ipswich Unilink Village" was
established as a building format plan in April 2002, and comprises 16 lots. It
is regulated under the
Bopdy Corporate and Community Management (Standard
Module) Regulation 1997 ("the Standard Module").
The brief facts are
as follows.
The annual general meeting was held on 25 June 2003 at which
James O’Hare, a employee of the Body Corporate Manager, Stewart
Silver
King & Burns, was elected as non-voting secretary and treasurer. There were
no nominees for the positions of chairperson
or ordinary member, either prior to
or from the floor of the meeting. This meant that the body corporate did not
have a properly
formed committee (see section 9 of the Standard
Module).
On 5 August 2003, the secretary forwarded a circular letter to
owners seeking nominations to fill the vacant positions in order to
comply with
the legislation and have a functioning committee. A nomination form was
attached. A number of owners have nominated
or expressed interest in being a
committee member.
The secretary, on behalf of the body corporate, has
made application for an order to allow an extraordinary general meeting to be
held to appoint a committee.
DETERMINATION:
"Ipswich
Unilink Village" was established as a building format plan in April 2002 and
comprises16 lots.
Section 25 of the Standard Module makes provision for
the filling of casual vacancies but does not specify that this process may apply
in the case where the minimum committee membership (3) was not achieved at the
annual general meeting election of committee members
(a proposed amendment to
the regulations will specifically cater for this situation).
Section 23
of Schedule 5 to the Act provides that an Administrator may be appointed by an
adjudicator to perform obligations of the
body corporate under the Act. It
seems to me that, in the absence of any particular provision to remedy the
inadequacy of a committee
elected at an annual general
meeting, the appointment
of an Administrator to convene a general meeting for the purpose is the most
appropriate means of doing
so. However, the size of the committee must be
limited to the minimum number, three members, under the
limiting provisions of
section 22(4) of the Standard Module. That section provides that where the
minimum number is not obtained
by nominations, then at the annual general
meeting nominations must be called from the floor but only sufficient members
must be
appointed to achieve the minium number. While
the present situation
concerns the period after the annual general meeting, the limit
would still
apply. Accordingly, as the non-voting
secretary/treasurer is counted as a
member, and a voting chairperson is necessary,
the body corporate needs to elect
one person as
chairperson and another person as ordinary member. In the
foregoing comments I have
assumed that O’Hare is to remain in office
as
secretary/treasurer (though I notice these positions were left open on the
nomination
form sent to owners) however my order is
general enough to allow for
alternative circumstances.
In the circumstances, I am satisfied that an
order should be made for the appointment of a person to convene a meeting to
choose members
to form a properly formed committee of three persons.
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2003/110.html