![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Queensland Body Corporate and Community Management Commissioner - Adjudicators Orders |
Last Updated: 17 May 2005
REFERENCE: 0435-2003
INTERIM ORDER OF AN
ADJUDICATOR
MADE UNDER PART 9 OF CHAPTER 6
BODY CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT ACT
1997
|
Number of Scheme:
|
9524
|
|
Name of Scheme:
|
Paloma
|
|
Address of Scheme:
|
93 - 97 Albatross Avenue MERMAID BEACH QLD 4170
|
TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to an application made under the abovementioned Act by Janice Marie O’Connor, the owner of lot 3
|
I hereby order that the application by
Janice Marie O’Connor, the owner of lot 3 for an interim order to restrict
the chairperson and committee
members of Paloma from unauthorised spending of
body corporate funds and to conform with the requirements set out in the Body
Corporate and Community Management Act 1997, is dismissed.
|
STATEMENT OF ADJUDICATOR’S REASONS FOR DECISION - REF
0435-2003
"Paloma" CTS 9524
The applicant, Janice Marie O’Connor, the owner of lot 3 has sought an
interim order to restrict the chairperson and committee
members of Paloma from
unauthorised spending of body corporate funds and to conform with the
requirements set out in the Body Corporate and Community Management Act
1997 (the Act).
Section 279(1) of the Act allows an
adjudicator to make an interim order if satisfied, on reasonable grounds, that
an interim order is necessary
because of the nature or urgency of the
circumstances of the application. An adjudicator’s order may contain
ancillary or consequential
provisions the adjudicator considers necessary or
appropriate (section 284(1)).
In any consideration of an
application which seeks the making of an interim order, it is necessary to
determine at the outset whether,
because of the nature or urgency of the
circumstances relating to the application, an interim order is in fact necessary
or appropriate.
The examples included in the Act under section 279(1) are
suggestive of the usual circumstances where an interim order might be made. Both
examples are in the nature of injunctive relief.
Whilst the range of matters
which might be the subject of an interim order is not capable of definition, the
applicant does need
to establish that the circumstances of the application
warrant the making of an interim order.
An interim order will not be
made, or will be refused, in circumstances where the only urgency relates to the
applicant’s desire
to resolve or expedite the matters in dispute, or where
the nature of the circumstances are such that the matter is not capable of
being
dealt with in the context of an interim order. Again, it is not possible to
define these circumstances. However, given that
an interim order may be made ex
parte (ie. without reference to, or submission from the respondent named in the
matter), then as
a guide, where the circumstances or matters in dispute include
matters or allegations not capable of objective consideration, or
ready
determination, or relate to issues of credibility or character, for example,
where an interim order would be inappropriate,
then the request for an interim
order will be dismissed. It is a matter for an adjudicator to determine in
respect of each application.
The order sought by the applicant, thought
described as "interim" is not interim or injunctive in nature. Rather it seeks
to impose
a general prohibition on the committee regarding what the applicant
considers is "unauthorised spending" by it. The nature of the
application is
such that it can not be effectively addressed or dealt with by way of an interim
order. Rather, it requires full investigation,
including submissions from other
parties to the dispute, before any order can be made. Accordingly, this
application for an interim
order is dismissed.
Moreover, it seems to me
that the basis of this application is already the subject of another application
to this office. That application
is application 408 of 2003 made by Helen Kable.
These two applications involve similar considerations.
This matter will
now be investigated in accordance with the usual processes undertaken by this
office. A final order regarding the
application will be made in due
course.
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2003/11.html