![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Queensland Body Corporate and Community Management Commissioner - Adjudicators Orders |
RA MeekREFERENCE: 0500-2001
ORDER OF AN ADJUDICATOR
MADE UNDER
PART 10 OF CHAPTER 6
BODY CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY
MANAGEMENT ACT 1997
| Number of Scheme: | 7889 |
| Name of Scheme: | Helensvale Villas |
| Address of Scheme: | 11- 15 Lindfied Road HELENSVALE QLD 4215 |
TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to an application made under the abovementioned Act by the Body Corporate for Helensvale Villas
RA MeekI hereby
order that, on the question of the body corporate’s liability to
effect rectification of damage to a lot resulting from termite infestation,
that
the body corporate is responsible to effect all necessary repairs to the lot in
question, lot 7, as are necessary to rectify
all damage to property resulting
from the infestation of termites to that lot. n
STATEMENT OF
ADJUDICATOR’S REASONS FOR DECISION - REF
0500-2001
“Helensvale Villas” CTS
7889
The applicant, the Body Corporate for Helensvale Villas, has sought the
following order of an adjudicator under the Body Corporate
and Community
Management Act 1997 (the Act), quote -
That the extent of the Body Corporates liability to effect rectification of damage to a lot resulting from long term infestation of termites, be clarified.
Section 223(1) provides that an adjudicator may make an
order that is just and equitable in the circumstances (including a declaratory
order) to resolve a dispute, in the context of a community titles scheme, about
–
a) a claimed or anticipated contravention of the Act or the community management statement; orb) the exercise of rights or powers, or the performance of duties, under this Act or the community management statement; or
c) a claimed or anticipated contravention of the terms, or the termination of, or the exercise of rights or powers under the terms of, or the performance of duties under the terms of an engagement contract or an authorisation contract.
An order may require a person to act, or prohibit a
person from acting, in a way stated in the order (section 223(2)). An
adjudicator’s
order may contain ancillary or consequential provisions the
adjudicator considers necessary or appropriate (section 230(1)).
In the
supporting grounds, the applicant states that –
The purpose of seeking the order is to establish if the owner is responsible to meet some portion of the costs to rectify extensive damage ... .
This matter is a simple one. There is nothing in the
body corporate’s material that suggests that the owner of lot 7, Rita
Janina
O’Brien, has caused or contributed to the termite infestation of
her lot. The grounds state –
The (“extraordinary building defect”) were under the shower tray and under the bath, where there was a large penetration of the concrete slab (about 30cms across) and the tray and bath simply “sat on bare earth”. The pest contractors are of the opinion that the termite nests near the bath and under the shower tray have been active for an extended period of time and would not be evident in an inspection.
The
scheme has been registered under a building unit plan (now a building format
plan). In a building format plan, the boundary of
a lot with another lot, or
with common property, is the centre of the floor, wall or ceiling located on the
boundary line. The body
corporate is responsible to maintain common property in
good condition (see section 109(1)).
It is clear from the material
provided that the termites have originated from common property; that is, both
from under and around
lots. In particular, a nest has been discovered in the
earth under the applicant’s bathroom. Given that there is no
“floor”,
then the earth would be part of the common property. It is
the duty of the body corporate to maintain common property, and in the
case of
termites to both prevent and eradicate termites, and further, to prevent damage
to lots or common property.
The fact that termites have infested this
lot evidences that the body corporate has failed in duty to properly maintain
the common
property. To this extent, the duty of the body corporate is regarded
as a strict one. Section 227 of the Act provides as follows
–
227 Order to repair damage or pay compensation
(1)
If the adjudicator is satisfied that the applicant for the order has
suffered damage to property because of a contravention of this
Act or the
community management statement, the adjudicator may order the person who the
adjudicator believes, on reasonable grounds,
to be responsible for
the
contravention—
(a) to carry out stated repairs, or have stated repairs
carried out, to the damaged property; or
(b) to pay compensation of an amount
fixed by the adjudicator.
Example—
A waterproofing membrane
in the roof of a building in the scheme leaks and there is damage to wallpaper
and carpets in a lot included
in the scheme. The membrane is part of the common
property and the leak results from a failure on the part of the body corporate
to maintain it in good order and condition, the adjudicator could, on
application of the lot’s owner, order the body corporate
to have the
damage repaired or to pay appropriate compensation.
(2) The order
cannot be made if—
(a) for an order under subsection (1)(a)—the
cost of carrying out the repairs is more than $75 000; or
(b) for an order
made under subsection (1)(b)—the amount of the compensation is more than
$10 000.
In the current application, I cannot make an order for repairs
under this section for a technical reason; namely that the applicant
is not the
owner of the lot. However, it is clear from the terms of the section that, in
particular circumstances, an adjudicator
can order the carrying out of repairs
or the payment of compensation to a person who has suffered damage to property
because of a
contravention of this Act or the community management statement.
Moreover, that order will be made against the person whom the adjudicator
believes on reasonable grounds to be responsible for the contravention.
What I intend to order is that the body corporate is responsible to
effect all necessary repairs to the lot in question, lot 7, as
are necessary to
rectify all damage to property resulting from the infestation of termites to
that lot.
n
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2002/27.html