![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Queensland Body Corporate and Community Management Commissioner - Adjudicators Orders |
P J HanlyREFERENCE: 0624-2000
ORDER OF AN ADJUDICATOR
MADE UNDER
PART 10 OF CHAPTER 6
BODY CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY
MANAGEMENT ACT 1997
| Number of Scheme: | 20279 |
| Name of Scheme: | Abraxas |
| Address of Scheme: | Policemans Spur Road, CONONDALE QLD 4552 |
TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to an application made under the abovementioned Act by
Anthony Neil Cannon and Dianne Maree Cannon, the co-owners of Lot 6
I hereby order that the
application by Anthony Neil Cannon and Dianne Maree Cannon, the co-owners of Lot
6, for an order that the body corporate
install speed bumps as agreed to at the
Annual General Meeting held on 21 February 2000, is
dismissed.
STATEMENT OF ADJUDICATOR’S REASONS FOR
DECISION - REF 0624-2000
“Abraxas” CTS
20279
The applicants, Anthony Neil Cannon and Dianne Maree Cannon, have sought
an order of an adjudicator under the Body Corporate and Community Management
Act 1997 (“the Act”) that the body corporate install speed bumps
as agreed to at the Annual General Meeting held in February
2000.
Section 223(1) of the Act provides that an adjudicator may
make an order that is just and equitable in the circumstances (including a
declaratory
order) to resolve a dispute, in the context of a community titles
scheme, about –
a) a claimed or anticipated contravention of the Act or the community management statement; orb) the exercise of rights or powers, or the performance of duties, under this Act or the community management statement; or
c) a claimed or anticipated contravention of the terms, or the termination of, or the exercise of rights or powers under the terms of, or the performance of duties under the terms of an engagement contract or an authorisation contract.
An order may require a person to act, or prohibit a
person from acting, in a way stated in the order (section 223(2)). An
adjudicator’s order may contain ancillary or consequential provisions the
adjudicator considers necessary or appropriate
(section
230(1)).
In the supporting grounds, the applicants state that the
body corporate has not installed speed bumps as agreed at the annual general
meeting. The applicants have included in the application a copy of the minutes
of the annual general meeting (“AGM”)
dated 21 February 2000. The
minutes indicate the following:
Other Business
1. Ongoing dissatisfaction was expressed very heatedly over the conduct of the tenants of Lot 7 concerning their behaviour regarding the use of the Common Area i.e. the road. Monitoring of cars is constant, as the speed limit is continually being broken, despite several signs having been erected. It was proposed that three speed bumps be placed to rectify the problem. Carried by the meeting. 2. Because of the cost of the speed bumps and other outgoings for the year, the bank account will be in the red from March. It was decided that all lot holders deposit $200.00 each as this year’s contribution to the Sinking Fund.
A copy of the application was
forwarded to the secretary for distribution to all members of the
committee.
The Body Corporate and Community Management (Standard
Module) Regulation 1997 ("the Standard Module") is the applicable regulation
module for this scheme. The regulation module makes provision for elements
of
body corporate administration such as the committee, general meetings, financial
management and insurance. The AGM to which the
applicants have referred must be
called and held in accordance with the Standard Module. The owners present at
the AGM considered
the issue of the speed bumps under “Other
Business”. The secretary/treasurer, Mr Hindle has submitted that this
matter
was raised at the meeting but was not included in the agenda for the
meeting. Section 52(5) of the Standard Module provides:
“A
general meeting may pass a resolution on a motion only if the motion
is—
(a) included as an item of business on the general
meeting’s agenda;
and
(b) stated in the voting papers accompanying the
notice of the meeting.”
It is clear that the matter concerning
the speed bumps was not included on the agenda for the AGN, but was simply
raised at the end
of the meeting in general discussion. Therefore, any decision
arrived at in this fashion cannot be subsequently relied on by an
owner against
the body corporate. Further, this decision does not authorise any specific work
to be performed and is nothing more
than a direction to be taken to rectify the
speeding problem. For this reason, the application has been
dismissed.
However, the body corporate (which consists of each owner of a
lot in the scheme) has an obligation under the Act to control, manage
and
administer the common property reasonably and for the benefit of the lot owners.
If there is a problem with the speed at which
vehicles travel on common
property, then the body corporate has an obligation to make proper decisions to
ensure that the problem
is eliminated or minimised. The installation of speed
bumps on common property is an obvious measure to reduce speed. A decision
concerning such an installation lies with the body corporate at a properly
convened meeting with relevant motions on the agenda and,
if necessary
quotations to complete the work. Further, if the body corporate has not
budgeted for this type of expenditure, then
the body corporate will also have to
consider fixing a special contribution to be levied on each lot owner to cover
the approved
cost.
The body corporate could also consider adding to or
amending its by-laws to make provision for the use and enjoyment of common
property.
Any alterations to the by-laws must be made in accordance with the
Act, and generally requires the adoption of a new Community Management
Statement, which must be lodged with, and recorded by the Registrar of Titles.
At present there is no evidence that the body corporate
has added any by-laws in
accordance with the Act.
If the body corporate or lot owners are
uncertain of the management and administration requirements of the legislation,
then I suggest
that consideration be given to contacting the Information Service
provided by the Commissioner on Freecall 1800 060 119.
1y
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2001/56.html