![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Queensland Body Corporate and Community Management Commissioner - Adjudicators Orders |
CG YOUNGREFERENCE: 0313-2001
ORDER OF AN ADJUDICATOR
MADE UNDER
PART 10 OF CHAPTER 6
BODY CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY
MANAGEMENT ACT 1997
| Number of Scheme: | 15022 |
| Name of Scheme: | Tobermory |
| Address of Scheme: | 216 The Esplanade BURLEIGH HEADS QLD 4220 |
TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to an application made under the abovementioned Act by the
Body Corporate for
Tobermory,
CG
YOUNGI hereby order that, within two (2) months of the date of this order
the body corporate shall engage a suitably qualified person to inspect and
report
on the most effective way to –
1. prevent water entering the garages of Lots 1, 2 and 4 from the deck of Lot 4.
2. drain storm water from the deck of Lot 4 to prevent further damage to the garage doors and their fixtures and fittings and the common property walls.
3. prevent water seeping from the garden beds constructed on the deck of Lot 4 to prevent further damage to the common property walls.
I
further order that within a further two (2) months, the body corporate must
at its cost engage appropriately qualified tradespersons to carry out
the work
recommended in the reports on matters 1 and 2 above, with the work to be
commenced and continued so as to be completed within
a reasonable time but no
later than six (6) months from the date of this order.
I further
order that within a further two (2) months, the owner of Lot 4 must at her
cost engage appropriately qualified tradespersons to carry out
the work
recommended in the reports on 3 above, with the work to be commenced and
continued so as to be completed within a reasonable
time but no later than six
(6) months from the date of this order.
STATEMENT OF
ADJUDICATOR’S REASONS FOR DECISION - REF
0313-2001
“Tobermory” CTS 15022
The applicant, the Body Corporate for Tobermory, has sought the following
order of an adjudicator under the Body Corporate and Community
Management Act
1997 (the Act), quote -
The body corporate committee would like an independent adjudicator to visit the site to determine the cause of the water flow, what can be done to correct/minimise the problem & which party (owner or body corporate) is responsible for having the work performed & meeting the financial costs.
Section 223(1) provides that an adjudicator may
make an order that is just and equitable in the circumstances (including a
declaratory
order) to resolve a dispute, in the context of a community titles
scheme, about –
a) a claimed or anticipated contravention of the Act or the community management statement; orb) the exercise of rights or powers, or the performance of duties, under this Act or the community management statement; or
c) a claimed or anticipated contravention of the terms, or the termination of, or the exercise of rights or powers under the terms of, or the performance of duties under the terms of an engagement contract or an authorisation contract.
An order may require a person to act, or prohibit a
person from acting, in a way stated in the order (section 223(2)). An
adjudicator’s
order may contain ancillary or consequential provisions the
adjudicator considers necessary or appropriate (section 230(1)).
The
order sought is a declaratory one that firstly seeks a determination as to what
is causing water to flow from “private property”
to common property,
secondly, what can be done to remedy the problem, and lastly, who is responsible
to meet the costs of the remedial
work.
“Tobermory”, BUP16
was registered on 20 September 1965 and comprises 6 lots. Under the Act, a BUP
(building units plan)
is now known as a building format plan.
Given that
all 6 lots voted to lodge this application, the owners would be aware of the
circumstances surrounding this application.
Therefore, I do not intend to set
out fully, the history of the building or the current situation regarding the
problem.
An inspection of the parcel was carried out on 11 September
2001. The report indicates that water from a deck attached to lot 4 is
seeping
through a large crack and into the garages of lots 1, 2 and 4 below. Water is
also running from the deck and down the outside
face of the garages, causing
damage to doors etc and staining brickwork. It is also reported that water is
seeping from garden beds
on the deck through to the outside face of the building
causing staining to the brickwork
Section 109 of the Body Corporate
and Community Management (Standard Module) Regulation 1997 (the Standard
Module) deals with the body corporate’s responsibility for maintenance of
common property. More particularly,
section 109(2)(b)(ii) of the Standard
Module specifically deals with the body corporate’s responsibility to
maintain certain
areas of the scheme that are not common property. The section
states-
Duties of body corporate about common property—Act,
s 114
109.(2) To the extent that lots included in the scheme are created under abuilding format plan of subdivision, the body corporate must—
(b) maintain the following elements of
scheme land that are not
common property in a structurally sound
condition—
(ii) roofing or other covering structures providing protection;
The concrete deck above the garages of lots
1, 2 and 4 is shown on the registered plan as part of lot 4. The deck in effect
provides
a roof or covering for the garages below and under the provisions of
the above section, the body corporate is responsible for any
repairs to the deck
to prevent water entering the garages below. Similarly, the body corporate must
ensure that any water runoff
from the deck is properly drained away to prevent
any damage to the common property.
The garden beds located on the deck
are internal to, and therefore part of lot 4. The inspection report tends to
indicate that there
is no waterproofing applied to the garden beds. This, it
would appear is allowing water to seep through the back of the garden beds
to
the outside walls and apparently staining the brickwork.
Section 120(2)
of the Standard Module provides that the owner of a lot must maintain the lot in
good condition. This would also include
an owners obligation to ensure that any
event occurring on the lot does not cause any subsequent damage to the common
property.
The application has requested that an adjudicator determine
what has caused the damage and what can be done to correct it. The problems
apparent here are such that a person qualified in this field (e.g. an engineer
or a qualified builder) will need to be engaged to
fully investigate and report
on the most appropriate method considered necessary to address them.
Section 225(1) provides that an adjudicator may make an interim order if
satisfied, on reasonable grounds, that an interim order is
necessary because of
the nature or urgency of the circumstances to which the application relates. An
adjudicator’s order may
contain ancillary or consequential provisions the
adjudicator considers necessary or appropriate (section 230(1)).
In the
circumstances I am satisfied that an order should be made in the terms
authorised by section 62(4) of the Standard Module.
The meeting shall be deemed
to be the first annual general meeting. As this order is final in its
determination of the matter,
no further order will be made.
I therefore
intend to order that the body corporate engage a suitably qualified person to
carry out the investigation and to provide
a written report on:
1. how to seal the deck or otherwise, to prevent water seeping into the garages, and
2. how to take water away from the deck to prevent it running down the outside face of the building and,
3. how to prevent water from seeping from the garden beds to the outside face of the building.
I intend to order that the body corporate meet
the costs of the work necessary to comply with 1 and 2 above.
I also
intend to order that the owner of lot 4 meet the costs of the work necessary to
comply with 3 above.
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2001/519.html