![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Queensland Body Corporate and Community Management Commissioner - Adjudicators Orders |
C G YOUNGREFERENCE: 0179-2001
ORDER OF AN ADJUDICATOR
MADE UNDER
PART 10 OF CHAPTER 6
BODY CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY
MANAGEMENT ACT 1997
| Number of Scheme: | 12681 |
| Name of Scheme: | La Porte D' Or |
| Address of Scheme: | 3422 Gold Coast Highway SURFERS PARADISE QLD 4217 |
TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to an application made under the abovementioned Act by the Body Corporate,
C G YOUNGI
hereby order that in respect of the air-conditioning systems situated on,
and servicing the lots comprising, each floor of the building –
1. The body corporate is responsible for the maintenance of: the compressor and pump situated in the plant room of each floor; both the chilled-water and return-water circuit pipes situated in each floor foyer and walkway area; and so much of the pipes connected to the common property circuit pipes which service each lot as is situated on common property or within the boundary walls of each lot.
2. Each lot owner is responsible for the maintenance of the Fan Coil Unit or Units, the ducts, vents and thermostat switches situated within their lot, and so much of the service pipes connected to the common property circuit pipes as are contained within the lot up to the inner surface of the boundary walls. 2n
STATEMENT OF ADJUDICATOR’S REASONS
FOR DECISION - REF 0179-2001
“La Porte D' Or”
CTS 12681
This is the final order to an application by the body corporate for La
Porte D'Or which has sought the following order of an adjudicator
under the
Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997 (“the Act”),
quote -
1. The repair and maintenance of those parts of the air conditioning system with each lot owner’s apartment (fan coil units and drip trays) are the responsibility of the respective lot owners; and
2. Lot owners are responsible for any damage caused to other lots by their respective air conditioning units,
The applicant also
sought an interim order in like terms which was dismissed by Interim Order
179-2001 issued on 28 March 2001 on
the grounds that neither the nature of the
application nor the degree of urgency were sufficient to warrant the issue of an
interim
order in the matter.
Section 223(1) of the Act provides that an
adjudicator may make an order that is just and equitable in the circumstances
(including
a declaratory order) to resolve a dispute, in the context of a
community titles scheme, about –
(a) a claimed or anticipated contravention of the Act or the community management statement; or (b) the exercise of rights or powers, or the performance of duties, under this Act or the community management statement; or (c) a claimed or anticipated contravention of the terms, or the termination of, or the exercise of rights or powers under the terms of, or the performance of duties under the terms of an engagement contract or an authorisation contract.
An order
may require a person to act, or prohibit a person from acting, in a way stated
in the order (section 223(2)). An adjudicator’s
order may contain
ancillary or consequential provisions the adjudicator considers necessary or
appropriate (section 230(1)).
Introduction:
To assist in my
understanding of the arrangement of the air-conditioning system in La Porte
D’Or, on Tuesday 24 April 2001 I
visited the scheme and inspected the
system in both the common property area and in two representative units
(“lots”),
in the presence of committee members Vito Georgio
(chairperson) and Yvonne Duniam.
My primary task is to determine the
apportionment of responsibility between the body corporate and the individual
lot owners for the
maintenance of the air-conditioning systems servicing the
lots in the building. The application has been precipitated by both a
large
number of service calls being made to attend air-conditioning problems in lots,
and the partial flooding of a lot (Unit 1001)
causing damage to carpets and
furniture within the lot and water penetration damage to the ceiling of the lot
below. Most service
calls relate to the overflow of condensation water through
ceilings. The building is now 25 years old and the system is experiencing
a
problem in the breakdown of fibreglass insulation wrapped around pipes and fan
coil units, as for example in Unit 1001 where moulting
fibreglass insulation
clogged the condensation outlet.
I will first describe the
air-conditioning system and then apply the relevant provisions of the Act and
the regulations applicable
to the scheme, the Body Corporate and Community
Management (Standard Module) Regulation 1977 (“the Standard
Module”). I will separately deal with the second order sought by the
applicant after determining the air-conditioning
matter.
Description
of Air-conditioning System:
Each floor of the building has its own air
conditioning plant which services the 5 or 6 lots situated on the floor,
consisting of
a compressor to chill water and a pump to circulate the chilled
water through a system of piping. The plant servicing a floor is
actually
situated on the floor above so the pipe carrying the chilled water passes
through the floor slab then travels in a circuit
over the common property foyer
and walkway areas attached to the underside of the slab but hidden by a false
ceiling.
There are two pipe circuits; one carrying the chilled water from
the plant and the other returning used water to the compressor plant
for
re-chilling. The chilled water is channelled into each lot by means of an
individual pipe connected to the chilled water circuit
pipe. Each such pipe
brings chilled water into a lot where it passes through one or more fan coil
units (“FCU’s”)
and then exits by another individual pipe
connected to the used water circuit pipe.
The FCU’s are wholly
situated within the lot (some evidently have up to three FCU’s servicing
multiple rooms) and can
be likened to a car radiator – cool air is
produced by an electric fan blowing over a coiled pipe through which the chilled
water is passed. The cooled air is vented into one or more rooms by the use of
ducting. The pipe bringing the chilled water into
the lot, the FCU (s), the
ducting, and the return pipe for used water, are all situated in, and hidden by,
either a false ceiling
or a drop panel (best described as a partial false
ceiling). There is a removable panel underneath each FCU for inspection and
maintenance
purposes.
Each FCU is insulated by fibreglass and a metal
jacket around the coil system. The unit has a drip-tray slung underneath to
catch
the condensation drips, which are then piped into an internal plumbing
stack (drain pipe) outlet. I have already commented on moulting
fibres falling
into the drip-tray which can eventually clog the outlet. The trapped condensed
water overflows causing water penetration
through the inspection panel beneath.
This has occurred in many instances causing the body corporate to expend
sizeable sums in
service calls.
The fan is connected to the relevant
lot’s power supply, as is the thermostat switch situated on an internal
wall of the lot
which is used by occupiers to regulate the degree of coolness.
That completes a simple description of the air-conditioning system that
services each floor of the building. In summary: the communal
portion of each
floor system comprises the compressor plant, pump, and the dual pipe circuits;
while the portion solely used by each
lot comprises the FCU’s, the pipes
connecting each lot to the circuit pipes, the ducts, vents and thermostat
switches. This
division between communal and individual lot parts of the
system, is physically marked by valves installed at the junction of the
lot
pipes and circuit pipes, which can be closed to isolate a lot from the rest of
the floor system for maintenance purposes.
Application of the
relevant law:
La Porte D”Or was registered as a building units plan
under the previous legislation, the Building Units and Group Titles Act 1980.
Under section 9(5)(a) of that previous legislation, the boundary of a lot is
the centre of the wall, floor and ceiling, and section 7 interpreted
“ceiling” as not including a false ceiling. Under the transitional
provisions of the (new) Act, a building
unit plan becomes a building format
plan. In any case, section 281 of the Land Title Act 1994 continues the
centre point boundaries, and the Schedule 4 Dictionary of the (new) Act also
defines a ceiling as excluding a false
ceiling.
The presence of a false
ceiling, and likewise a “drop panel” covering pipes, ducts and other
like infrastructure items
for part of a room ceiling, is therefore irrelevant in
determining the boundaries of a lot. Accordingly, the FCU’s and
associated
piping, ducting and wiring contained in the void between a false
ceiling or drop panel and the slab ceiling, must be regarded as
being situated
within the lot.
Section 120 of the Standard Module provides
–
ú
Obligations of owners and occupiers—Act, s 122120.(1) An occupier of a lot included in the scheme must keep the parts
of the lot readily observable from another lot or common property in a clean
and tidy condition.
(2) The owner of a lot included in the scheme must maintain the lot in
good condition.
(3) The owner’s obligation under subsection (2) to maintain the lot in
good condition does not apply to a part of the lot the body corporate is
required under this regulation to maintain in good condition.
(4) The owner of a lot included in the scheme must maintain the utility
infrastructure within the boundaries of the lot, and not part of common
property, in good condition and, if it is in need of replacement, must replace
it.
(5) This section applies only to a lot that is not a community titles
scheme.
(my underlining)
Under this provision, owners are responsible for the maintenance of their
lot, including any utility infrastructure, except where
the Standard Module
provides that the body corporate is responsible for “part of the
lot” or where part of the infrastructure
in a lot is “common
property”. These exceptions are set out in section 21 of the
Act.
Section 11 of the Act defines the common property (essentially that
part of a scheme that is not a lot) and its scope is extended
by section 21 in
respect of “utility infrastructure”. “Utility
infrastructure” is defined in Schedule 4
of the Act as including pipes,
ducts, wires, plant and equipment, and which supplies “utility
services” to a lot. “Utility
service” is also defined in that
schedule and includes air-conditioning. Section 21 (1) states
–
ú
Utility infrastructure as common property21.(1) Common property for a community titles scheme includes all
utility infrastructure forming part of scheme land, except utility
infrastructure—
(a) solely related to supplying utility services to a lot; and(b) within the boundaries of the lot (according to the way the
boundaries of the lot are defined in the plan of subdivision under
which the lot is created); and
(c) located other than within a boundary structure for the lot.
(3) In this section –
“boundary structure”, for a lot include in a community titles scheme, means a floor, wall or ceiling in which is located the boundary of the lot with another lot or common property.
(my underlining)
In applying the above provisions to the system, the FCU’s being
situated within the lot are the responsibility of the owner
to maintain and
repair (including any replacement). Also, the pipe connected to the chilled
water circuit pipe bringing the chilled
water to the FCU(s) is the
responsibility of the body corporate from the point of the joining of the pipes
to the inner surface of
the boundary structure wall situated between the lot and
the common property foyer. It is similarly responsible for the exit piping
connecting to the used water circuit pipe from the point where it enters the
boundary structure wall to the joining of the pipes.
Conversely, the owner is
responsible for that portion of those pipes from where they enter and exit the
lot at the boundary wall.
Of course all of the circuit pipes and plant
(compressor and pump) on each floor, being situated on common property, are the
responsibility
of the body corporate.
In the grounds to the application
the applicant suggests that section 109 of the Standard Module applies to the
situation. If so,
this would result in owners being similarly responsible for
the maintenance of the FCU’s, but also for the full length of the
two
pipes connecting to the circuit pipes rather than merely internally to the inner
surface of the lot boundary walls when section
21 applies. I do not agree with
this. Section 109 states –
ú
Duties of body corporate about common property—Act, s 114109.(1) The body corporate must maintain common property in good
condition, including, to the extent that common property is structural in
nature, in a structurally sound condition.
(2) To the extent that lots included in the scheme are created under a
building format plan of subdivision, the body corporate must—
(a) maintain in good condition—
(i) railings, parapets and balustrades on (whether precisely, orfor all practical purposes) the boundary of a lot and common
property; and
(ii) doors, windows and associated fittings situated in a
boundary wall separating a lot from common property; and
(iii) roofing membranes that are not common property but that
provide protection for lots or common property; and
(b) maintain the following elements of scheme land that are notcommon property in a structurally sound condition—
(i) foundation structures;(ii) roofing or other covering structures providing protection;
(iii) essential supporting framework, including load-bearing
walls.
(3) Despite anything in subsections (1) and (2)—
(a) the body corporate is not responsible for maintaining fixtures orfittings installed by the occupier of a lot if they were installed for
the occupier’s own benefit; and
(b) the owner of the lot is responsible for maintaining utility
infrastructure in good order and condition, to the extent that the
utility infrastructure—
(i) relates only to supplying utility services to a particular lot;and
(ii) is 1 of the following types—
• hot-water systems • washing machines • clothes dryers • another device providing a utility service of a domestic
nature to a lot.
Examples for subsection (3)(b)—1. An airconditioning plant is installed on the common property, but relates only
to supplying utility services to a particular lot. The owner of the lot would be
responsible for maintaining the airconditioning equipment.
2. A hot-water system is installed on the common property, but supplies water
only to a particular lot. The owner of the lot would be responsible for maintaining
the hot-water system and the associated pipes and wiring.
(4) To avoid doubt, it is declared that, despite an obligation the body
corporate may have under subsection (2) to maintain a part of a lot in good
condition or in a structurally sound condition, the body corporate is not
prevented from recovering an amount of damages from a person (whether
or not the owner of the lot) whose actions cause or contribute to damage or
deterioration of the part of the lot.
(my underlining)
Both section 21 of the Act and section 109(3)(b) of the Standard Module
concern maintenance responsibility for utility infrastructure.
Section 21 is
the general provision in defining maintenance responsibility while section 109
is a specific provision which applies
only where particular circumstances exist.
Under the rules of statutory interpretation, such a specific provision prevails
over the
general provision to the extent of the inconsistency between the
provisions.
Section 109(3)(b) only applies where the utility
infrastructure is one of the devices listed out in sub-paragraph (3)(b)(ii),
“hot-water systems...”, including “another device
providing a utility service of a domestic nature to a lot”. That an
air-conditioner comes within the scope of the latter “another
device...” is verified by its adoption in the first example of
“Examples for subsection (3)(b)”. However, the sub-section
requires in (i) that the infrastructure device must supply utility services to a
“particular lot.” That is, it only applies where
there is a particular device sited on common property which supplies utility
services to
one lot. That excludes the instant situation where there is a
common air–conditioning plant servicing all of the lots on a
floor. Even
though the two connecting pipes are solely providing and retrieving chilled
water to a lot, that does not bring them
within the scope of section
109.
Finally, none of the infra structure pipes in the lots also service
another lot or lots and therefore are not part of common property.
I do notice
from the plan of the building that some lots do contain common property vertical
ducts between certain floors which
would contain, presumably, some electrical
wiring, water pipes etc. However these are not of relevance
here.
Responsibility for Damage:
The second order sought
by the body corporate is that owners are responsible for damage caused to other
lots by their air-conditioning
units. I gather that this refers to water damage
caused by overflowing drip trays to both the owner’s lot and other lots or
the common property.
I cannot make such a blanket order – each of
those situations where damage has resulted will need to be examined and a
decision
made in regard to the particular circumstances. The question of
insurance also arises which no doubt the owner would pursue
initially.
Conclusion:
For the reasons above, my order is that
the owners are responsible for the FCUs, and all internal piping. This means
that owners
are themselves responsible for maintaining the FCU’s in their
lot including the drip tray and ensuring that the fibre glass
insulation does
not block the drip tray outlet. They will also be responsible for replacement
of the insulation if that is necessary,
and in time, the replacement of the FCU
itself.
In a building where there are absentee owners, this may create a
maintenance problem for those owners. It will be a matter for them
to arrange
maintenance of their air-conditioning equipment in the same manner they arrange
for the maintenance of internal plumbing
and contents generally.
Given
that a failure to maintain the air-conditioning may well void any insurance
claim, and may cause damage to another lot or the
common property (as happened
where the air-conditioner was left running for a long period in an unoccupied
lot), it would be in everyone’s
interest if the body corporate committee
were to bring the problem to the notice of owners generally. Some owners may
wish to replace
the insulation to avoid a likely problem but at the minimum
owners will need to monitor their system for this problem. This is an
area that
the committee may wish to consider what advice it can give in the interests of
owners. Section 119 of the Standard Module
does allow for a body corporate to
provide services to an owner which would otherwise be own responsibility,
providing it is not
imposed on owners but is only supplied to those owners who
want it, and the full cost is met by the participating owner or owners
and is
not a body corporate expense.
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2001/232.html