![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Queensland Body Corporate and Community Management Commissioner - Adjudicators Orders |
P J HANLYREFERENCE: 0042-2001
ORDER OF AN ADJUDICATOR
MADE UNDER
PART 10 OF CHAPTER 6
BODY CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY
MANAGEMENT ACT 1997
| Number of Scheme: | 11564 |
| Name of Scheme: | River Point |
| Address of Scheme: | 77 Brighton Parade, Southport Qld 4215 |
TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to an application made under the abovementioned Act by
Richard Albert Dixon, the co-owner of lot 15
I hereby order that the
application for an order that the co-owner of lot 15, Richard Albert Dixon, be
granted permission to install an air-conditioning
unit either on one of the
ledges outside the lot or in the main bedroom window of the lot, is
dismissed.
STATEMENT OF ADJUDICATOR’S REASONS FOR
DECISION - REF 0042-2001
“River Point” CTS
11564
The applicant, Richard Albert Dixon, the co-owner of lot 15, has sought
the following order of an adjudicator under the Body Corporate and Community
Management Act 1997 (the Act), quote -
I wish to obtain permission to install an air-conditioning unit either on
one of the ledges outside my unit or install a window air-conditioning
unit in
the main bedroom of my unit.
Section 223(1) of the Act
provides that an adjudicator may make an order that is just and equitable in the
circumstances (including a declaratory
order) to resolve a dispute, in the
context of a community titles scheme, about –
a) a claimed or anticipated contravention of the Act or the community management statement; orb) the exercise of rights or powers, or the performance of duties, under this Act or the community management statement; or
c) a claimed or anticipated contravention of the terms, or the termination of, or the exercise of rights or powers under the terms of, or the performance of duties under the terms of an engagement contract or an authorisation contract.
An order may require a person to act, or prohibit a
person from acting, in a way stated in the order (section 223(2)). An
adjudicator’s order may contain ancillary or consequential provisions the
adjudicator considers necessary or appropriate
(section
230(1)).
In the supporting grounds, the applicant states that the
body corporate has given him permission to install an air-conditioning unit
on
the balcony of his lot, but he has received advice from an
“air-conditioning expert” that this would be unsatisfactory
because
the balcony is solid concrete and will trap the hot air expelled from the
compressor. The applicant further states that
the placement of the
air-conditioning unit on his balcony will interfere with his future plans to
enclose the balcony, for which
he says he has body corporate approval. The
applicant seeks an order allowing him to install the air-conditioning unit
either on
a ledge outside his lot or through his main bedroom window.
The
body corporate committee was invited to respond to the application. In his
response the chairperson stated that the proposed
locations for the
applicant’s air-conditioning unit would contravene both by-law 1,
concerning noise, and by-law 8, concerning
the appearance of a lot.
I
note that the committee has taken steps to have two other unauthorised
air-conditioning units removed from the windows of two lots.
I further note
that the committee has authorised the installation of an air-conditioning unit
on the applicant’s balcony.
The applicant claims that he has been told
that this location is unsuitable, but has not provided any confirmation of that
advice.
I consider that the committee is discharging its duty to ensure
that the by-laws applicable to the scheme are enforced. There is
considerable
merit in maintaining a uniform external appearance to the scheme, particularly
in relation to the preservation of the
value of lots. Whilst I concede that the
Queensland climate is such that air-conditioning should be regarded as a
necessity, the
applicant has been given approval to install air-conditioning in
such a position as to also protect the value of the property and
other
owners’ investments. I am not prepared to overturn the committee’s
decision.
The application is dismissed.2n
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2001/179.html