![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Queensland Body Corporate and Community Management Commissioner - Adjudicators Orders |
P J HANLYREFERENCE: 0749-2000
INTERIM ORDER OF AN
ADJUDICATOR
MADE UNDER PART 10 OF CHAPTER 6
BODY CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT ACT
1997
| Number of Scheme: | 20898 |
| Name of Scheme: | Gemview Court |
| Address of Scheme: | 6/410 Chatswood Road SHAILER PARK QLD 4128 |
TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to an application made under the abovementioned Act by
Oliver Black and Patricia May Black, the owners of lot 6
I hereby order that the
application for an interim order that the replacement of pavers authorised by
the body corporate at the extraordinary general
meeting held on 19 December 2000
be placed on hold, is dismissed.
I further order that the body
corporate shall fix a special contribution to be levied on lot owners for the
cost of repair of the pavers, authorised
to proceed at the extraordinary general
meeting held on 19 December 2000.
STATEMENT OF ADJUDICATOR’S REASONS FOR DECISION -
REF 0749-2000
“Gemview Court” CMS
20898
The applicants Oliver Black and Patricia May Black, the owners of lot 6,
have sought the following order of an adjudicator under the
Body Corporate
and Community Management Act 1997 (the Act), that the cost of the
replacement of pavers be paid for by way of a special levy, rather than from
monies held in the sinking
fund.
The applicants have also sought an
interim order of an adjudicator in similar terms.
Section 225(1)
provides that an adjudicator may make an interim order if satisfied, on
reasonable grounds, that an interim order is necessary because
of the nature or
urgency of the circumstances to which the application relates. An
adjudicator’s order may contain ancillary
or consequential provisions the
adjudicator considers necessary or appropriate (section
230(1)).
In the supporting grounds, the applicants state that they
are happy for the work to be carried out, but do not believe that it should
be
paid for from monies already held in the sinking fund, and should instead be
paid for by way of a special levy.
The body corporate manager was invited
to respond to the application. No response was received in the short time
allowed.
The Standard Module regulates this scheme. Section
95(2) provides as follows:
(2) If a liability arises for which no provision, or inadequate provision,
has been made in the budget, the body corporate must, by ordinary
resolution—
(a) fix a special contribution to be levied on the owner of each lot
towards the liability; and
(b) decide whether the contribution is to be paid in a single amount or
in instalments and, if in instalments, the number of instalments;
and
(c) fix the date on or before which payment of the single amount or
each instalment is required.
It would appear from the material provided that the
body corporate has not budgeted for the pavers to be repaired. Accordingly, the
owners should be levied for the cost of such work. I have therefore dismissed
the interim order, but, in addition, I have ordered
that the body corporate
shall levy owners for the cost of the repair of the pavers.
In the
circumstances, it is not intended to invite further submissions regarding this
matter, or to make a further order, since this
decision, though an interim one
as sought by the applicant, is final in its determination of this matter. If
the applicant considers
that an appeal of this decision is warranted, then it
should appeal the interim order.
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2000/680.html