![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Queensland Body Corporate and Community Management Commissioner - Adjudicators Orders |
P J HANLYREFERENCE: 0422-2000
ORDER OF AN ADJUDICATOR
MADE UNDER
PART 10 OF CHAPTER 6
BODY CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY
MANAGEMENT ACT 1997
| Number of Scheme: | 7576 |
| Name of Scheme: | Tarraleah III |
| Address of Scheme: | 119 Sugar Road MAROOCHYDORE QLD 4558 |
TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to an application made under the abovementioned Act by
Patricia Caroline Howarth, the owner of lot 3
I hereby order that the owner
of lot 3 shall properly maintain and keep in a state of good and serviceable
repair the common property allocated to
lot 3 by the exclusive use by-law 36,
including the retaining wall constructed within the boundary of the exclusive
use area of lot
3.
STATEMENT OF ADJUDICATOR’S REASONS FOR
DECISION - REF 0422-2000
“Tarraleah III” CTS
7576
The applicant, Patricia Caroline Howarth, the owner of lot 3, has sought
the following order of an adjudicator under the Body Corporate and Community
Management Act 1997 (the Act), quote –
I am seeking clarification re who is responsible for the repair of the retaining wall.
Section 223(1) of the Act provides that an adjudicator may make an
order that is just and equitable in the circumstances (including a declaratory
order) to resolve a dispute, in the context of a community titles scheme, about
–
a) a claimed or anticipated contravention of the Act or the community management statement; orb) the exercise of rights or powers, or the performance of duties, under this Act or the community management statement; or
c) a claimed or anticipated contravention of the terms, or the termination of, or the exercise of rights or powers under the terms of, or the performance of duties under the terms of an engagement contract or an authorisation contract.
An order may require a person to act, or prohibit a
person from acting, in a way stated in the order (section 223(2)). An
adjudicator’s order may contain ancillary or consequential provisions the
adjudicator considers necessary or appropriate
(section
230(1)).
In the supporting grounds, the applicant states that she has
been advised by the body corporate manager that she is responsible for
the
retaining wall in her exclusive use area. The applicant notes that she is not
able to put locks on the gates and the area is
used as an access area. The
applicant further states that she is looking for a resolution to the
problem.
The body corporate committee was invited to respond to the
application. A submission was received from the body corporate manager,
on
behalf of the body corporate. The body corporate manager notes that the area in
question has been allocated to the applicant
under the exclusive use by-law 36
passed by resolution without dissent on 20 February 1987. The body corporate
manager further notes
that the owner to whom the exclusive use allocation is
made is responsible for the performance of the duty of the body corporate.
The
body corporate manager further states that the only time the applicant’s
exclusive use area was used for access was during
recent construction of a
dividing fence and retaining wall on the southern side of the units. The body
corporate manager further
states that the body corporate gardener does not use
the area for access.
The only by-laws recorded for this scheme are those
recorded by the Registrar of Titles on 17 June 1987. Contained within those
by-laws
is by-law 36 allocating various areas of exclusive use to lot owners. I
note from the photographs provided by the applicant that
the retaining wall is
constructed within the confines of the exclusive use area allocated to lot 3 by
virtue of by-law 36.
Section 38(1)(b)(i) of the (previous)
Building Units and Group Titles Act 1980 (BUGTA) provided as
follows:
38 Duties of body corporate.
(1) A body
corporate shall –
(a) ...(b) properly maintain and keep in a state of good and serviceable repair –
(i) the common property including where practicable the establishment and maintenance of suitable lawns and gardens thereon; and (ii) ...
In
these circumstances, the applicant is responsible for the duties of the body
corporate to properly maintain and keep the retaining
wall in a state of good
and serviceable repair. I have ordered accordingly.2n
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2000/594.html