![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Queensland Body Corporate and Community Management Commissioner - Adjudicators Orders |
P J HANLYREFERENCE: 0574-2000
ORDER OF AN ADJUDICATOR
MADE UNDER
PART 10 OF CHAPTER 6
BODY CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY
MANAGEMENT ACT 1997
| Number of Scheme: | 11184 |
| Name of Scheme: | Jadon Place |
| Address of Scheme: | 31 Hooker Drive BROADBEACH QLD 4218 |
TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to an application made under the abovementioned Act by
Graham Nicholas Frogley, the co-owner of lot.8
I hereby order that, upon
receipt by it of the appropriate photocopying fee payable by the applicant,
Graham Nicholas Frogley, the body corporate
shall thereafter within 7 days,
provide to the applicant, Graham Nicholas Frogley, a copy of the complete body
corporate roll of
owners.
STATEMENT OF ADJUDICATOR’S
REASONS FOR DECISION - REF 0574-2000
“Jadon
Place” CTS 11184
The applicant, Graham Nicholas Frogley, has sought an order of an
adjudicator under the Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997
(the Act) that the body corporate provide him with a copy of the roll of
owners.
Section 223(1) of the Act provides that an adjudicator may
make an order that is just and equitable in the circumstances (including a
declaratory
order) to resolve a dispute, in the context of a community titles
scheme, about –
a) a claimed or anticipated contravention of the Act or the community management statement; orb) the exercise of rights or powers, or the performance of duties, under this Act or the community management statement; or
c) a claimed or anticipated contravention of the terms, or the termination of, or the exercise of rights or powers under the terms of, or the performance of duties under the terms of an engagement contract or an authorisation contract.
An order may require a person to act, or prohibit a
person from acting, in a way stated in the order (section 223(2)). An
adjudicator’s order may contain ancillary or consequential provisions the
adjudicator considers necessary or appropriate
(section
230(1)).
In the supporting grounds, the applicant states that he
sought a copy of the body corporate roll from the secretary on 22 May 2000.
The
applicant further states that at the annual general meeting held on 6 June 2000
the secretary advised him that there are 340
owners, and the computer printout
would be between 12 to 15 pages. The applicant further states that the
secretary has been instructed
by the chairperson not to provide a copy of
the roll to the applicant as his request was “too
controversial”.
I have decided, under the powers delegated to me by
the commissioner, (section 189 of the Act), that there is good reason for
dispensing
with the requirement to give notice of this application to the body
corporate (section 194(5) of the Act). I have spoken with the
secretary, Mr
Nessen, on 12 October 2000. Mr Nessen confirmed that he had been instructed by
the chairperson not to provide a copy
of the roll to the applicant as
“owners do not want it”.
Section 162 of the Act
provides as follows:
ú
Information to be given to interested persons
162.(1) This section provides for the giving of information by the body
corporate for a community titles scheme from the body corporate’s records.
(2) Within 7 days after receiving a written request from an interested
person accompanied by the fee prescribed under the regulation module
applying to the scheme, the body corporate must—
(a) permit the person to inspect the body corporate’s records; or
(b) give the person a copy of a record kept by the body corporate.
(3) The body corporate must, within 7 days after receiving a written
request from an interested person accompanied by the fee prescribed under
the regulation module applying to the scheme, issue a certificate (a “body
corporate information certificate”) in the approved form giving financial
and other information about the lot.
(4) A person who obtains a certificate under subsection (3) may rely on
the certificate against the body corporate as conclusive evidence of matters
stated in the certificate, other than to the extent to which the certificate
contains an error that is reasonably apparent.
(5) In this section—
“interested person” means—
(a) the owner, or a mortgagee, of a lot included in the scheme; or
(b) the buyer of a lot included in the scheme; or
(c) another person who satisfies the body corporate of a proper
interest in the information sought; or
(d) the agent of a person mentioned in paragraph (a), (b) or
(c).
Section 151 of the Body Corporate and Community
Management (Standard Module) Regulation 1997 (Standard Module) provides as
follows:
Fee for information given to interested persons—Act, s 162
151.(1) For section 162(2) of the Act—
(a) the prescribed fee for inspection of the body corporate’s records
is—
(i) if the person inspecting the records is a lot owner—$10; or
(ii) if the person inspecting the records is not a lot owner—$20;
and
(b) the prescribed fee for obtaining a copy of a record kept by the
body corporate is 50c for each page supplied.
(2) For section 162(3) of the Act, the prescribed fee to accompany a
request for a body corporate information certificate under the subsection is
$40, plus a priority fee of $15 if the certificate is required within 24 hours,
plus a fee of $10 if the certificate is to be faxed.
(3) The priority fee mentioned in subsection (2) must be refunded if the
certificate is not supplied within 24 hours.
The applicant has made his request for the roll in writing, and has
included the prescribed fee of $10.00. The applicant has also
acknowledged that
he has to pay the further sum of $0.50 per page. The Act makes it perfectly
clear that the body corporate has
no discretion as to whether it provides the
information sought. It is certainly not a matter for the owners to refuse the
request
because they “do not want it”, or for the chairperson to
direct the secretary that the information is not to be provided
because it is
“too controversial”.
I have ordered that the body corporate
shall provide a copy of the roll to the applicant within 7 days after he has
paid to the body
corporate the appropriate sum payable for the photocopying
charges.1n
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2000/519.html