![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Queensland Body Corporate and Community Management Commissioner - Adjudicators Orders |
P G DanielsREFERENCE: 0009-2000
ORDER OF AN ADJUDICATOR
MADE UNDER
PART 10 OF CHAPTER 6
BODY CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY
MANAGEMENT ACT 1997
| Number of Scheme: | 9138 |
| Name of Scheme: | Riverglen Lodge |
| Address of Scheme: | 266 Stan Hill Drive CHEVRON ISLAND QLD 4217 |
TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to an application made under the abovementioned Act by
Dr Janice Leona Hills the owner of lots 3 and 4,
P G
DanielsI hereby order that the application for the following orders:
1. An agreement from Mrs Westmore to allow me to continue running the Body Corporate which is the cheapest and most efficient way. I am happy to consult and inform on matters, as I have always done. Currently Hookers divide expenses between us and this has been done in differing and incorrect proportions.
2. An order made on Mrs Westmore to pay moneys owed to the Body Corporate in outstanding fees i.e. $600 for the 1997-98 year.
3. An undertaking from Mrs Westmore to reply to correspondence from me regarding the management of the Body Corporate affairs (e.g. the suggestion that we both needed to increase our per unit contribution, major maintenance needed on the property etc.)
4. An agreement to some recompense for the duties I undertake. $250 per annum.
5. An agreement to immediate clearing of guttering etc as required. Inspection and new quote required.
is
dismissed.1n
STATEMENT
OF ADJUDICATOR’S REASONS FOR DECISION - REF
0009-2000
“Riverglen Lodge” CTS
9138
The applicant, Dr Janice Leona Hills, has sought the following orders of
an adjudicator under the Body Corporate and Community Management
Act 1997 (the
Act):
1. An agreement from Mrs Westmore to allow me to continue running the Body Corporate which is the cheapest and most efficient way. I am happy to consult and inform on matters, as I have always done. Currently Hookers divide expenses between us and this has been done in differing and incorrect proportions.
2. An order made on Mrs Westmore to pay moneys owed to the Body Corporate in outstanding fees i.e. $600 for the 1997-98 year.
3. An undertaking from Mrs Westmore to reply to correspondence from me regarding the management of the Body Corporate affairs (e.g. the suggestion that we both needed to increase our per unit contribution, major maintenance needed on the property etc.)
4. An agreement to some recompense for the duties I undertake. $250 per annum.
5. An agreement to immediate clearing of guttering etc as required. Inspection and new quote required.
Section 223(1)
provides that an adjudicator may make an order that is just and equitable in the
circumstances (including a declaratory
order) to resolve a dispute, in the
context of a community titles scheme, about –
a) a claimed or anticipated contravention of the Act or the community management statement; orb) the exercise of rights or powers, or the performance of duties, under this Act or the community management statement; or
c) a claimed or anticipated contravention of the terms, or the termination of, or the exercise of rights or powers under the terms of, or the performance of duties under the terms of an engagement contract or an authorisation contract.
An order may require a person to act, or prohibit a
person from acting, in a way stated in the order (section 223(2)). An
adjudicator’s
order may contain ancillary or consequential provisions the
adjudicator considers necessary or appropriate (section 230(1)).
I will
deal with orders 1 and 4 together as they are related and the remainder of the
orders separately.
Orders 1 and 2
It seems the applicant wants to be appointed as the Body Corporate
Manager for the scheme and be paid $250 per annum for her work.
I am
unable to make such an order. Sections 78 and 87 of the Body Corporate and
Community Management (Standard Module) Regulation 1997 (the Regulation)
provide how a Body Corporate Manager may be appointed. These sections provide
as follows:
ú
Form of engagement78.(1) The engagement of a person as a body corporate manager or
service contractor is void if the engagement does not comply with the
requirements stated in subsection (2).
(2) The engagement must—
(a) be in writing; and
(b) state the term of the engagement (including when the term begins
and when it ends); and
(c) state the functions the body corporate manager or service
contractor is required or authorised to carry out; and
(d) state the basis on which payment for the body corporate
manager’s or service contractor’s services is to be worked out.
Examples of paragraph (d)—1. A body corporate manager’s payment could be calculated on the basis of an
amount per lot.
2. A body corporate manager’s payment could include charges calculated on the
basis of a stated amount per telephone inquiry or a stated amount for attendance fees
for additional committee or general meetings.
(3) The engagement must not be in the form of a by-law.
ú
Authority to make engagement or give authorisation87.(1) The body corporate may engage a person as a body corporate
manager or service contractor, or authorise a person as a letting agent, only
if—
(a) the engagement or authorisation is approved by ordinary
resolution of the body corporate;17 and
(b) the terms of the engagement or authorisation are included in the
material forwarded to members of the body corporate for the
general meeting that considers the motion to approve the
engagement or authorisation.
(2) If subsection (1) is not complied with, the engagement or
authorisation is void.
(3) A body corporate may agree to the amendment of an engagement or
authorisation mentioned in subsection (1) only if the amendment is
approved by ordinary resolution of the body corporate.
(4) If subsection (3) is not complied with, the amendment of the
engagement or authorisation is void.
17 If the cost of the engagement is more than the relevant limit for major spendingfor the scheme, quotations may be required under section 104 (Quotes for major
spending).
I also refer the applicant to
section 80 of the Regulation which provides as
follows:
ú
Term of engagement of body corporate manager80.(1) The term of the engagement of a person as a body corporate
manager (after allowing for any rights or options of extension or renewal)
must not be longer than 3 years.
(2) If the term purports to be longer than 3 years, it is taken to be 3 years.
As will be apparent from the above, the
engagement of a Body Corporate Manager must be approved by ordinary resolution
at a general
meeting. The engagement must also comply with formal requirements
of section 78 and 80.
Order 2 – Outstanding
fees
An adjudicator does not have jurisdiction to order that an owner
pay outstanding levies. An application will need to be brought in
an
appropriate Court or Tribunal.
Order 3 –
Correspondence
It is, of course, highly desirable for owners in a
Body Corporate to communicate effectively in respect of matters pertaining to
the
Body Corporate. This will tend to ensure the Body Corporate operates for
the mutual benefit of all owners.
However, there is no legal obligation
for an owner to respond to correspondence. I therefore cannot make an order as
requested by
the applicant.
Order 5 –
Guttering
External guttering is part of the common property. It must
be maintained by the Body Corporate pursuant to section 109(1) of the
Regulation
which provides as follows:
ú
Duties of body corporate about common property—Act, s 114109.(1) The body corporate must maintain common property in good
condition, including, to the extent that common property is structural in
nature, in a structurally sound condition.
Normally, a Committee makes decisions about the maintenance of
common property within the limits of its spending. The limits are
provided by
section 103 of the Regulation as the number of lots times $100. In this Body
Corporate comprising of five lots, a Committee
could resolve to spend up to
$500. Where the amount proposed to be expended is greater than $500, the Body
Corporate in general
meeting must approve the expenditure.
I am
informed by the applicant that there is no functioning Committee for this Body
Corporate. Consequently, there is no elected
Secretary who can call a Committee
meeting or a general meeting of the Body Corporate.
It seems to me that
the applicant needs to apply for an order to call and hold a general meeting of
the Body Corporate at which the
Body Corporate can determine whether to pass a
resolution in respect of maintaining the guttering, whether to engage the
applicant
as a Body Corporate Manager and the election of a Committee. If
possible, the applicant should obtain the consent of Ms Westmore
in respect of
the proposed meeting. If consent cannot be obtained, then the application can
still be made but an order will not
be made until Ms Westmore has been invited
to make a submission in respect of the matter.
I am providing with these
reasons copies of brochures produced by this office titled, “The body
Corporate – An Introduction”,
“General Meetings”, and
“Maintenance Issues”. These brochures contain useful information
about the operation
of a Body Corporate. Parties should also be aware that this
office operates an information line that assist persons with enquiries
about
Body Corporate matters. The number is 1800 060 119.
Submissions were not
sought from Ms Westmore in respect of this application as I have determined that
I do not have power to make
the orders sought.
I dismiss the
application.
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2000/31.html